Case law

Golden v. State Bar

213 Cal. 237 · California Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1931

(Herron v. State Bar, 212 Cal. 196 [ 298 Pac. 474 ].) Ten members of the board participated in the hearing. Eight of the ten made the findings and recommendation for disbarment. … matter in the order to show cause (see San Francisco Bar Assn. v.

People v. Town of Berkeley

102 Cal. 298 · California Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1894

(McKinney v. County Commrs., 26 Fla. 267 .) In Fox v. … In Ruggles v. Board of Trustees of the City of Woodland , 88 Cal. 430 , application was made for a writ of mandate *307 to compel the trustees to call and provide for the holding of an election of city officers.

Magruder v. City of Redwood

203 Cal. 665 · California Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1928

Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 477 [38 A. L. R. 1479, 234 Pac. 381 ]; Zahn v. Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 497 [ 234 Pac. 388 ]). … (Miller v. Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 477, 490 [38 A. L. R. 1479, 234 Pac. 381, 385 ].)

Moreno v. Cairns

20 Cal. 2d 531 · California Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1942

(People v. Marsh, 30 Cal. App. 424 [159 Pac. 191]; State ex rel. Young v. Ladeen, 104 Minn. 252 [ 116 N. W. 486 , 16 L. R. A. (NS) 1058].) … (Kramer v. Board of Police Commissioners, 39 Cal. App. 396 [ 179 Pac. 216 ].)

In Re Peterson

14 Cal. 2d 82 · California Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1939

(United States v. Wilson, 7 Pet. 150 [ 8 L. Ed. 640 ] , and see cases cited in annotation, 52 A. L. R. 835.) The same conclusion has been reached in California. … W. 213 ]; State v. Goddard, 69 Or. 73 [ 133 Pac. 90 , 138 Pac. 243 , Ann. Cas. 1916A, 146].)

In Re Marriage of Bouquet

16 Cal. 3d 583 · California Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1976

Co. (1962). 58 Cal.2d 142 , 149 [ 23 Cal.Rptr. 592 , 373 P.2d 640 ]; DiGenova v. State Board of Education (1962) 57 Cal.2d 167, 176 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 369 , 367 P.2d 865 ]), this presumption does not defy rebuttal. … (See In re Marriage of Brown (1976) 15 Cal.3d 838 , 842 [ 126 Cal.Rptr. 633 , 544 P.2d 561 ].)

Atkinson v. Lorbeer

111 Cal. 419 · California Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1896

(See Whipley v. McKune, supra.) … (Tebbe v. Smith, 108 Cal. 101 ; 49 Am. St. Rep. 64 .)

People v. Chism

58 Cal. 4th 1266 · California Supreme Court · May 5, 2014

(People v. Brown (2003) 31 Cal.4th 518, 573, fn. 24 [ 3 Cal.Rptr.3d 145 , 73 P.3d 1137 ]; see People v. … (People v. Brown, supra, 33 Cal.4th at p. 398 ; see People v.

People v. Bennett

17 Cal. 4th 373 · California Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1998

Larson replaced Busher on the corporation’s board of directors with two members of her own family. … Justice Brown would resolve this case under the “inevitable discovery” doctrine (see Nix v.

Alkow v. State Bar

38 Cal. 2d 257 · California Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1952

(Fall v. State Bar, 25 Cal.2d 149, 159 [ 153 P.2d 1 ].) However, the burden is on petitioner to show wherein the decision of the board is erroneous or unlawful. (Aydelotte v. … State Bar, 209 Cal. 737, 740 [ 290 P. 41 ]; Ring v. State Bar, 218 Cal. 747, 751 [ 24 P.2d 821 ]; Light v. State Bar, 14 Cal.2d 328, 336 [ 94 P.2d 35 ]; Propp v.

Felt v. Waughop

193 Cal. 498 · California Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1924

Brown, who has likewise complied with all of said requirements. … This conclusion finds some support in the case of State v. Marks, 30 La. Ann. 97 , cited and quoted from in the recent case of People v. La Barre, ante, p. 388 [ 224 Pac. 750 ].

Humiston v. Shaffer

145 Cal. 195 · California Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1904

In Dougherty v. … It was applied in Agard v.

City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court

8 Cal. 3d 723 · California Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1973

Board of Police Commissioners (1951) 107 Cal.App.2d 816 [ 238 P.2d 62 ]; and Temple v. Horrall (1949) 92 Cal.App.2d 177 [ 206 P.2d 909 ].) … Board of Police Commissioners, supra, 107 Cal.App.2d 816 ; Temple v. Horrall, supra, 92 Cal.App.2d 177 .) The exception is Stoker v.

Williams v. Bergin

108 Cal. 166 · California Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1895

(Cruger v. Hudson River R. R. Co., 12 N. Y. 201 ; Scammon v. … In City of Lowell v.

Kreling v. Superior Court

18 Cal. 2d 884 · California Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1941

In the action of People v. … In People v. Lim, S.

Remsberg v. Hackney Manufacturing Co.

174 Cal. 799 · California Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1917

Code, sec. 1764; Sutro v. Rhodes, 92 Cal. 117, 123 , [ 28 Pac. 98 ]; Browning v. McNear, 145 Cal. 272, 280 , [ 78 Pac. 722 ].) … W. 3 ]; Ehrsam v. Brown, 76 Kan. 206 , [15 L. R. A. (N. S.) 877, 91 Pac. 179 ].)

Cline v. Lewis

175 Cal. 315 · California Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1917

(Smith, v. Mathews, 155 Cal. 752, 757 , [ 103 Pac. 199, 202 ].) … (People v.

Balen v. Peralta Junior College District

11 Cal. 3d 821 · California Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1974

(See, e.g., Holbrook v. Board of Education (1951) 37 Cal.2d 316 [ 231 P.2d 853 ]; Rutley v. Belmont Elementary Sch. Dist. (1973) 31 Cal.App.3d 702 [ 107 Cal.Rptr. 671 ]; Curtis v. … (DiGenova v. State Board of Education (1962) 57 Cal.2d 167, 176 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 369 , 367 P.2d 865 ].)

John Hoagland v. City of Sacramento

52 Cal. 142 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1877

Lim. chap. 8, and The People v. Hurlburt, 24 Mich. 44 ; State v. Noyes, 10 Fost. (N. H.) 292; Bow v. Allenstown, 34 N. H. 351; Caldwell v. The Justices, 4 Jones’ Eq. 323; Webster v. Harrington, 32 Conn. 131 ; Com. v. … If from any cause a vacancy shall occur in the Board, it shall be filled by the remaining members of the Board.. “ Sec. 3.

In Re Byrnes

32 Cal. 2d 843 · California Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1948

offenses that were affirmed in the first action (People v. … [affirmed on appeal] in the first action” (People v.