Case law

Los Angeles County v. San José Land & Water Co.

96 Cal. 93 · California Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1892

In such suit, no informality in the proceedings of the board shall vitiate said suit, but the said order of the board, directing the district attorney to bring suit, shall be conclusive proof of the regularity thereof; and … (Bamrell v. B. S. San Joaquin County), p. 155, is not in point here.

Best v. State Bar

57 Cal. 2d 633 · California Supreme Court · May 15, 1962

Also, the burden is upon one seeking a review of a recommendation of the Board of Governors to show that its findings are not supported by the evidence or that its recommendation is erroneous or unlawful. (Rock v. … Mayer v. State Bar, 2 Cal.2d 71, 75 [3] [ 39 P.2d 206 ].) The penalty recommended by the Board of Governors—disbarment—is not excessive.

Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Wright

213 Cal. 335 · California Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1931

(Los Angeles County Flood Control Dist. v. Hamilton, 177 Cal. 119 [ 169 Pac. 1028 ].) On March 26, 1924, the board directed J. W. … (Peery v. City of Los Angeles, supra; Inglewood v. County of Los Angeles, 207 Cal. 697 [ 280 Pac. 360 ].)

Gurnsey v. Northern California Power Co.

160 Cal. 699 · California Supreme Court · Sep 8, 1911

Co. v. Allen, 113 Ind. 581 , [ 15 N. E. 446 ]; Reichert v. Railway, 51 Ark. 491 , 11 S. W. 696 , [5 L. R. A. 183]; Hanlin v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co., 61 Wis. 515 , [ 21 N. W. 623 ]; Kittell v. … Co. v. Southern Pacific Co., 135 Cal. 202 , [ 67 Pac. 773 ]; Southern Cal. Ry. Co. v. Slauson, 138 Cal. 344 , 94 Am. St. Rep. 58 , 71 Pac. 352 ]; Crescent Canal Co. v. Montgomery, 143 Cal. 252 , [65 L. R.

People ex rel. Mariposa County v. Counts

89 Cal. 15 · California Supreme Court · May 4, 1891

In People v. Dunn, 80 Cal. 211 , 13 Am. St. … The subscriptions and the bonds authorized by this election were held valid by the supreme court of the United States. ( County of Chicot v. Lewis, 103 U. S. 164 .) In McMahon v.

People ex rel. Alexander v. Swift

31 Cal. 26 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1866

The relator acted under the direction or on the suggestion of one, or perhaps two, of the three Trustees, but he was not employed by the Board as such. … (McCracken v. San Fran cisco, 16 Cal. 592 ; Zottman v. San Francisco, 20 Cal. 96 .)

Michel v. Smith

188 Cal. 199 · California Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1922

(West v. Baxendale, 9 Com. B. 141; Sutton v. Johnstone, 1 Term Rep. 507, 545, per E'yre, Baron.) … In the case of Wall v.

Brewer v. Simpson

53 Cal. 2d 567 · California Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1960

(See Brown v. Superior Court (1949), 34 Cal.2d 559 [ 212 P.2d 878 ].) On July 18, 1950, Abigail and Ross compromised the claims of the Brown relatives for $27,000. … (Brown v.

Salazar v. Eastin

9 Cal. 4th 836 · California Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1995

(San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of Supervisors (1992) 2 Cal.4th 571, 577 [ 7 Cal.Rptr.2d 245 , 828 P.2d 147 ]; London & S. F. Bank v. Parrott (1899) 125 Cal. 472, 481 [ 58 P. 164 ].) … (San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 2 Cal.4th at p. 577; Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 49 Cal.3d 432, 443 [ 261 Cal.Rptr. 574 , 111 P.2d 610 ].)

People v. Reynolds

28 Cal. 107 · California Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1865

shown in the records of the proceedings of the Board, which are set forth in the answer. … (Ferris v. Coover, 10 Cal. 633 .)

Holabird v. Railroad Commission

171 Cal. 691 · California Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1916

(Wilson v. Board of Supervisors of Sacramento County, 3 Cal. 386 ; People v. County Judge, 40 Cal. 479 ; Aberding v. Macham, 40 Cal. 656 ; Lamb v. Schottler, 54 Cal. 320 ; Sayers v. … Superior Court, 84 Cal. 642 , [ 24 Pac. 296 ]; Gauld v. Board of Supervisors, 122 Cal. 18 , [ 54 Pac. 272 ].) In Wilson v.

Maggart v. State Bar

7 Cal. 2d 495 · California Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1936

(McGuire v. McGuire, 129 Cal. App. 644 [ 19 Pac. (2d) 7 ].) … (Herrscher v. State Bar of California, 4 Cal. (2d) 399 [ 49 Pac. (2d) 832 ].)

Ornelas v. Randolph

4 Cal. 4th 1095 · California Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1993

(Moore v. California State Board of Accountancy (1992) 2 Cal.4th 999, 1011-1012 [ 9 Cal.Rptr.2d 358 , 831 P.2d 798 ].) … (Stats. 1980, ch. 408, § 1, p. 797; Hubbard v. Brown (1990) 50 Cal.3d 189 [ 266 Cal.Rptr. 491 , 785 P.2d 1183 ]; Darr v. Lone Star Industries, Inc. (1979) 94 Cal.App.3d 895 [ 157 Cal.Rptr. 90 ]; O’Shea v. Claude C.

Miller v. Dailey

136 Cal. 212 · California Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1902

Boyne v. Ryan, 100 Cal. 265 ; State v. Orange Training School for Nurses, 42 Atl. Rep. 846 ; Keller v. Hewitt, 109 Cal. 146 , are cited. … It was held in Keller v.

In Re Bushman

1 Cal. 3d 767 · California Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1970

(People v. Ah Woo (1865) 28 Cal. 205, 212 ; People v. O'Brien (1900) 130 Cal. 1, 3-4 [ 62 P. 297 ].) … (People v. McClennegen (1925) 195 Cal. 445, 452 [ 234 P. 91 ].)

Little v. Auto Stiegler, Inc.

130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 892 · California Supreme Court · Feb 27, 2003

Auto Stiegler cites Brown v. Wheat First Securities, Inc. (D.C. … As the Brown court summarized it, Cole acknowledged “that the Supreme Court in Gilmer v.

Weaver v. Reddy

135 Cal. 430 · California Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1902

The board of health here made defendant is the board created by the general state law, which at that time had sole control of the alms-house. … Lawlor v.

Sarver v. County of Los Angeles

156 Cal. 187 · California Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1909

Co. v. Comrs. etc., 68 Fed. 171 .] … That such patented devices may be considered, and, indeed, called for by the board of supervisors, is well settled. (Nicholson Pavement Co. v. Painter, 35 Cal. 697 ; Dunne v. Altschul, 57 Cal. 474 .)

Allied Architects' Ass'n of Los Angeles v. Payne

192 Cal. 431 · California Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1923

(Veterans' Welfare Board v. Jordan, supra.) … As was said in Veterans' Welfare Board v.

Denman v. Broderick

111 Cal. 96 · California Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1896

The board of supervisors of each county is ex officio the board of election commissioners in and for the county, and the common council, or other governing body of a city, is ex officio the board of election commissioners … (Desmond v. Dunn, 55 Cal. 242 ; Earle v. Board of Education, supra.) In Desmond v.