Case law

People v. King

5 Cal. 4th 59 · California Supreme Court · May 17, 1993

(People v. Harris (1989) 47 Cal.3d 1047, 1103 [ 255 Cal.Rptr. 352 , 767 P.2d 619 ]; see also People v. Cardenas (1982) 31 Cal.3d 897, 913-914 [ 184 Cal.Rptr. 165 , 647 P.2d 569 ]; People v. … Abandonment of the “separate but equal” doctrine in Brown v. Board of Education (1954) 347 U.S. 483 [ 98 L.Ed. 873 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 38 A.L.R.2d 1180 ] is a prime example.

People v. Hallner

43 Cal. 2d 715 · California Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1954

(Avant v. Ouachita Parish School Board, 215 La. 990 [ 41 So.2d 854 ].) … (United States v. Brown, 333 U.S. 18, 25 [ 68 S.Ct. 376 , 92 L.Ed. 442 ]; see also Gooch v. United States, 297 U.S. 124, 128 [ 56 S.Ct. 395 , 80 L.Ed. 522 ] ; Kordel v.

Garvin v. Chambers

195 Cal. 212 · California Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1924

(Thrasher v. Board of Medical Examiners, 44 Cal. App. 26 [185 Pac. 1006]; Bryant v. Board of Supervisors, 32 Cal. App. 495 [ 163 Pac. 341 ]; Stumpf v. Board of Supervisors, 131 Cal. 364 [ 82 Am. St. … (People v. Board, 39 N. Y. 506 .) In the case of Carey v. Plainfield, 53 N. J.

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. County of Stanislaus

16 Cal. 4th 1143 · California Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1997

BROWN, J., Dissenting. … ."]; Brown v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc. (E.D.Va. 1994) 868 F.

Suckow v. Alderson

182 Cal. 247 · California Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1920

Board of Supervisors, 16 Cal. 210; Imperial W. Co. v. Board of Supervisors, 162 Cal. 18 , [ 120 Pac. 780 ] ; 11 Cor. Jur. 122); to declare the law and define the rights of the parties under it (Frasher v. … (Imperial Water Co. v. Board of Supervisors, supra, and cases there cited.)

Kidder v. Stevens

60 Cal. 414 · California Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1882

Brown the executor thereof. … (So held in Salmon v. Symonds, 24 Cal. 264 .)

Miller v. Glass

44 Cal. 2d 359 · California Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1955

(Collins v. Owens, supra, p. 718 ; Kaufman v. Brown, 93 Cal.App.2d 508, 511-512 [ 209 P.2d 156 ].) … (See Collins v. Owens, 77 Cal.App.2d 713 [ 176 P.2d 372 ]; Kaufman v. Brown, supra, 93 Cal.App.2d 508 ; Oppenheimer v. City of Los Angeles, supra, 104 Cal.App.2d 545 .)

In Re Martinez

52 Cal. 2d 808 · California Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1959

Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of Rudolph Brown Martinez, an inmate of the California State Prison at Folsom. … Co. v. Superior Court, 150 Cal. 153, 156 [ 88 P. 718 ]; Board of Commissioners v. Younger, 29 Cal. 147, 150 [87 Am.Dec. 164].)

Shelton v. City of Los Angeles

206 Cal. 544 · California Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1929

A. 755, 28 Pac. 272, 675 ]; Robertson v. Board of Library Trustees, 136 Cal. 403 [ 69 Pac. 88 ].) … Rep. 586 , 33 Atl. 256 ] ; Gunnison v. Board of Education, 176 N. T. 11 [ 68 N. E. 106 ]; Winston v. City of Spokane, 12 Wash. 524 [ 41 Pac. 888 ]; Uhler v.

State of California v. Superior Court

12 Cal. 3d 237 · California Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1974

(Selby Realty Co. v. City of San Buenaventura, supra, 10 Cal.3d 110, 127 ; Burns v. City Council (1973) 31 Cal.App.3d 999, 1004-1005 [ 107 Cal.Rptr. 787 ]; Brown v. … The leading authority is Miller v. Board of Public Works (1925) 195 Cal. 477 [ 234 P. 381 , 38 A.L.R. 1479 ].

Windt v. Covert

152 Cal. 350 · California Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1907

(Campbell v. Freeman, 99 Cal. 546, 548 , [ 34 Pac. 113 ]; Woodard v. Hennegan, 128 Cal. 293 , [ 60 Pac. 769 ]; Banta v. Wise, 135 Cal. 277 , [ 67 Pac. 129 ].) … In Foster v. Furlong, 8 N. Dak. 282, [ 78 N.

Bradley v. Voorsanger

143 Cal. 214 · California Supreme Court · May 10, 1904

Plaintiff, a taxpayer, seeks -to enjoin the defendants the board of election commissioners of the city and county of San Francisco, and defendant the registrar of voters, from expending any money, making or drawing any demands … (San Diego School Dist. v. Supervisors, 97 Cal. *216 438; Foster v. Smith, 115 Cal. 611 ; Weaver v. Reddy, 135 Cal. 430 .) As was said in Matter of Manning, 139 N. Y. 446 (cited in Foster v.

Morton v. Broderick

118 Cal. 474 · California Supreme Court · Oct 6, 1897

(Braidy v. Theritt, 17 Kan. 468 ; Hamlin v. Kassafer, 15 Or. 456 ; 3 Am. St. Rep. 176 ; State v. Draper, supra; State v. Johnson, supra; Lawrence v. Hanley, supra; State v. Atlantic City, supra.) … (Truman v. Board, 110 Cal. 128 .)

HFH, LTD. v. Superior Court

15 Cal. 3d 508 · California Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1975

Kenneth Brown, City Attorney, Ebben & Brown and Thomas F. Winfield III for Real Parties in Interest. Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, Robert H. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Nicholas C. Yost and E. … (Carter v. Harper [1923] 182 Wis. 148 [, 153]....)" ( Miller v. Board of Public Works, supra , 195 Cal. 477, 488 .)

People v. Martin

42 Cal. 3d 437 · California Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1986

in People v. … People v. Herrera, supra, 127 Cal.App.3d 590 , People v. Mitchell, supra, 152 Cal.App.3d 433 , and People v.

Chambers v. Satterlee

40 Cal. 497 · California Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1871

Since the decision in Taylor v. … So, in the case of Nolan v.

City & County of San Francisco v. Superior Court

53 Cal. 2d 236 · California Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1959

Clair, judge thereof, from further proceedings in an action entitled Hinman v. Board of Permit Appeals, No. 489702. … The status of the San Francisco Board of Permit Appeals has been established. In Lindell Co. v.

People v. Millum

42 Cal. 2d 524 · California Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1954

(Brown v. Mississippi, supra, 297 U.S. at p. 286 .) … (Lee v. Mississippi, supra, 332 U.S. 742; Brown v. Mississippi, supra, 297 U.S. 278 ; People v. Rodriguez, supra, 58 Cal.App.2d 415 .)

People v. Gleason

122 Cal. 370 · California Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1898

(P eople v. Hickman, 113 Cal. 80 ; People v. Mayes, 113 Cal. 618 .) They did not, however, make any attempt to attack his credibility, and as a witness he stood before the jury in the same light as any other witness. … (People v. Devine, 95 Cal. 227 ; Comptoir D’Escompte v. Dresbach, 78 Cal. 15 ; In re Calkins, 112 Cal. 296 .)

Abbott v. McNutt

218 Cal. 225 · California Supreme Court · May 27, 1933

It was so held by this court in the cases of People v. Provines, 34 Cal. 521 , and Staude v. Election Commrs., 61 Cal. 313, 322, 323 . … (State v. Kennon, 7 Ohio St. 547 , 559; State v. Stanley, 66 N. C. 56 , 60 [ 8 Am. Rep. 488 ].)