Case law

Long v. Neville

36 Cal. 455 · California Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1868

(Marshall v. Hosmer, 4 Mass. 63 ; Bond v. Ward, 7 Mass. 125 ; Marsh v. Gold, 2 Pick. 290 ; Chamberlain v. Beller, 18 N. Y. 117 .) … (Curtis v. Patterson, 8 Cow. 67 .) In Marsh v. Gold , Mr.

People v. Randy G.

110 Cal. Rptr. 2d 516 · California Supreme Court · Aug 13, 2001

California fulfills its obligations by requiring each school board to establish rules and regulations to govern student conduct and discipline (Ed. … (Brown v. Board of Education (1954) 347 U.S. 483, 493 [ 74 S.Ct. 686, 691 , 98 L.Ed. 873 , 38 A.L.R.2d 1180 ].) “Some modicum of discipline and order is essential if the educational function is to be performed.”

Koshland v. Spring

116 Cal. 689 · California Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1897

The intent of the owners to dedicate was fairly apparent, whether or not Brown was in strictness their agent. (People v. Beaudry, 91 Cal. 213 ; Griffiths v. Galindo, 86 Cal. 192 .) 3. … Language is used in San Leandro v.

People v. Forbes

22 Cal. 135 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1863

(King v. Wilkes, 4 Burr, 2575; Commonwealth v. Leaths, 1 Virg. Cases, 151; State v. Smith, 5 Day, 175 ; Russel v. Commonwealth, 7 Serg. & Rawle, 489 ; Brown v. Commonwealth, 4 Rawle, 259 .) In the case of Brown v. … If a judg *139 ment is valid, as in the case of Brown v.

People v. Thomas

California Supreme Court · Jan 26, 2023

“As the United State Supreme Court recognized in Brown v. … (People v. Brown (2003) 31 Cal.4th 518, 570; People v.

People v. Weston

169 Cal. 393 · California Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1915

As to the witness Brown the showing was not quite as satisfactory, as the evidence, disclosed that the deputy sheriff seeking the witnesses, although informed that Brown had gone to “Scotia,” had failed to follow up that … It is thoroughly settled, as said in People v.

Taylor v. Spear

196 Cal. 709 · California Supreme Court · Aug 20, 1925

(Zottman v. City and County of San Francisco, 20 Cal. 96 [ 81 Am. Dec. 96 ] ; San Diego W. Co. v. City of San Diego, 59 Cal. 517 ; Sutro v. Pettit, 74 Cal. 332, 337 [ 5 Am. St. … Kent, 11 Ohio St. 553 ; Wiley v. Alleghany County Commrs., 51 Md. 404 ; St. Louis v. Weher, 44 Mo. 550 ; Knoxville v. Bird, 12 Lea (Tenn.), 121 [ 47 Am.

Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of La Habra

25 Cal. 4th 809 · California Supreme Court · Jun 4, 2001

(Abbott v. City of Los Angeles (1958) 50 Cal.2d 438, 462-464 [ 326 P.2d 484 ]; Dillon v. Board of Pension Commrs. (1941) 18 Cal.2d 427, 429-430 [ 116 P.2d 37 , 136 A.L.R. 800 ].) … (Agnew v. State Bd. of Equalization (1999) 21 Cal.4th 310, 320 [ 87 Cal.Rptr.2d 423 , 981 P.2d 52 ]; see, e.g., Brown v.

Kemble v. McPhaill

128 Cal. 444 · California Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1900

As said in Robinson v. Southern Pac. Co., 105 Cal. 545 : “We see nothing here demanding the construction claimed. It is not plainly manifest that the legislature so intended. It is not manifest at all. … As held in Mitchell v.

People v. Hendricks

44 Cal. 3d 635 · California Supreme Court · Feb 29, 1988

In People v. Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512, 538-544 [ 230 Cal.Rptr. 834 , 726 P.2d 516 ], vacated on other grounds sub nom. California v. … (P. 276, quoting People v. Brown, supra, 40 Cal.3d 512, 541 .) Myers appears to be factually distinguishable.

People v. Williams

184 Cal. 590 · California Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1920

Brown, went to the Hall of Justice and procured a warrant for the arrest of defendant. Later she and Mrs. Brown started for the apartment of deceased, taking a street-car for the comer of Church and Seventeenth Streets. … As we said in People v.

People Ex Rel. State Bd. of Harbor Comm'rs v. Kerber

152 Cal. 731 · California Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1908

(Shively v. Bowlby, 152 U. S. 1 , [14 Sup. Ct. 548]; Farish v. Coon, 40 Cal. 57 ; People v. Morrill, 26 Cal. 337 ; Ward v. Mulford, 32 Cal. 365 .) … (Hoadley v. San Francisco, 50 Cal. 275 ; People v. Pope, 53 Cal. 437 ; Visalia v. Jacobs, 65 Cal. 434 , [ 52 Am. Rep. 303 , 4 Pac. 433 ]; San Leandro v. Le Breton, 72 Cal. 170 , [ 13 Pac. 405 ] ; Yolo Co. v.

Esberg v. Badaracco

202 Cal. 110 · California Supreme Court · Sep 12, 1927

Badaracco, ante, p. 18 [ 258 Pac. 937 ], Griffin v. Boyle, ante, p. 95 [ 259 Pac. 729 ], and Jackson v. … (Kennedy v. Miller, 97 Cal. 429 [ 32 Pac. 558 ] ; Hancock v. Board of Education, 140 Cal. 554, 561 [ 74 Pac. 44 ]; Los Angeles School District v. Long-den, 148 Cal. 380, 383 [ 83 Pac. 246 ] ; Board of Education v.

Jones v. Title Guaranty Etc. Co.

178 Cal. 375 · California Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1918

(Stonesifer v. Kilburn, 94 Cal. 33 , [ 29 Pac. 332 ]; Banta v. Siller, 121 Cal. 414 , [ 53 Pac. 935 ].) … Such a venture does not constitute a partnership (Coward v.

Pohle v. Christian

21 Cal. 2d 83 · California Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1942

No further action was taken with reference to the matter until August 6, 1938, at which time the position and classification of Property Auditor was abolished by the State Personnel Board. … (Wienke v. Smith, 179 Cal. 220 [ 176 P. 42 ] ; Wood v. Jotham Bixby Co., 29 Cal.App.2d 294 [ 84 P.2d 204 ]; Kadow v. City of Los Angeles, 31 Cal.App.2d 324 [ 87 P.2d 906 ]; 25 Cal.Jur. 931.)

Styne v. Stevens

109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 14 · California Supreme Court · Jul 12, 2001

Brown (Cal.Lab.Com., June 2, 1994) TAC No. 66-92 [same]; but see Moreno v. … Brown (1970) 13 Cal.App.3d 513, 520-521 [ 89 Cal.Rptr. 651 ]; but see Sea World Corp. v. Superior Court (1973) 34 Cal.App.3d 494, 496-503 [ 110 Cal.Rptr. 232 ].)

Calhoun v. Superior Court

46 Cal. 2d 18 · California Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1955

Board of Equalization. … Brown.

Ramsdell v. Fuller

28 Cal. 37 · California Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1865

Brown to the defendant, Jane E. Fuller, who was then the wife of Silas Fuller. The purchase money was paid out of funds belonging to the separate estate of Mrs. Fuller. … There is nothing, other than the record of the deed from Brown to Jane E.

Kiefer v. Laventhal

110 Cal. 667 · California Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1896

The facts pleaded are that Brown and Beaslin entered into an agreement (set forth in full in the complaint) by which Brown sold to Beaslin, for the sum of sixty dollars to him paid, certain personal property. … (Lower v. Winters, 7 Cow. 263 .)

Borel v. Rollins

30 Cal. 408 · California Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1866

In *414 Jackson v. … The judgment of the Supreme Court in this case was affirmed by the Court of Errors, in which Chancellor Kent delivered the opinion of the Court. ( 16 John. 323 -325; see, also, Baker v. Lorillard, 4 Coms. 257.)