Case law

Taylor v. Spear

196 Cal. 709 · California Supreme Court · Aug 20, 1925

(Zottman v. City and County of San Francisco, 20 Cal. 96 [ 81 Am. Dec. 96 ] ; San Diego W. Co. v. City of San Diego, 59 Cal. 517 ; Sutro v. Pettit, 74 Cal. 332, 337 [ 5 Am. St. … Kent, 11 Ohio St. 553 ; Wiley v. Alleghany County Commrs., 51 Md. 404 ; St. Louis v. Weher, 44 Mo. 550 ; Knoxville v. Bird, 12 Lea (Tenn.), 121 [ 47 Am.

Filarsky v. Superior Court

121 Cal. Rptr. 2d 844 · California Supreme Court · Jul 15, 2002

Brown (1979) 441 U.S. 281, 290-294 [ 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1711-1714 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 ].) … Amici curiae rely upon the high court’s decision in Renegotiation Board v.

People v. Marshall

69 Cal. 2d 51 · California Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1968

In the present case the brown paper bag itself was not contraband. Only by prying into its hidden interior (see Bie *59 licki v. Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal .2d 602, 605 [ 21 Cal. … The fact that the container was only a brown paper bag instead of a packing box, purse, handbag, briefcase, hatbox, snuffbox, trunk, desk, or chest of drawers (see People v.

Burks v. Poppy Construction Co.

57 Cal. 2d 463 · California Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1962

Housing Authority, 120 Cal.App.2d 1, 23 [ 260 P.2d 668 ] ; Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 495 [ 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 , 38 A.L.R.2d 1180 ] ; Sharp v. … Board of Medical Examiners, ante, pp. 228, 233 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 501 , 368 P.2d 101 ].)

People v. Moore

51 Cal. 4th 386 · California Supreme Court · Jan 31, 2011

At 2:15 p.m., a neighbor noticed two or three boards were missing from the fence. … to warn Carnahan about the prowlers and the missing boards, and the man he had seen in Carnahan’s backyard.

Alameda MacAdamizing Co. v. Pringle

130 Cal. 226 · California Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1900

(Brown v. Jenks, 98 Cal. 12 ; Burnett v. Llewelyn, 32 Pac. Rep. 702 .) … We are unable to distinguish this case from the rule laid down in Brown v. Jenks, supra. *229 It is claimed that a different rule has been adopted in other states.

United States v. State

25 Cal. 2d 697 · California Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1944

In the case of Hamilton v. Brown, 161 US. 256 [16 S. … Smith v. Board of Commissioners, 132 Kan. 233 [ 294 P. 915 ] (certiorari denied, 283 U.S. 855 [ 51 S.Ct. 648 , 75 L.Ed. 1462 ]).)

In Re Reynolds

25 Cal. 3d 131 · California Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1979

He notes that Burnside v. Byars, supra, 363 F.2d 744 involved the organizational button of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, as did Blackwell v. … Issaquena County Board of Education (5th Cir.1966) 363 F.2d 749 .

People v. Wells

33 Cal. 2d 330 · California Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1949

Brown then came from the room and walked along the hall. Defendant seized a heavy crockery cuspidor and threw it at Brown. … (People v. Chin Mook Sow (1877), 51 Cal. 597, 600 ; People v. McKeller (1878), 53 Cal. 65 ; People v. Bell (1878), 53 Cal. 119 ; People v. Dye (1888), 75 Cal. 108, 111-112 [ 16 P. 537 ]; Davis v.

London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

181 Cal. 460 · California Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1919

In Brown v. … (Olson v. Superior Court, 175 Cal. 250 , [1 A. L. R. 1589, 165 Pac. 706 ].) The following passage from Brown v.

People v. Simmons

28 Cal. 2d 699 · California Supreme Court · Aug 16, 1946

Defendant grabbed Brown’s hand, whereupon Brown seized defendant around the waist in an effort to throw him out. However, Brown was then hit above the eye and was dazed. He thinks the blow was by Webb with a gun. … Defendant next ordered Brown to open the safe in the storeroom. When Brown said he did not know the combination, he was hit again with the tire iron.

Koshland v. Spring

116 Cal. 689 · California Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1897

The intent of the owners to dedicate was fairly apparent, whether or not Brown was in strictness their agent. (People v. Beaudry, 91 Cal. 213 ; Griffiths v. Galindo, 86 Cal. 192 .) 3. … Language is used in San Leandro v.

Gunn v. Bank of California

99 Cal. 349 · California Supreme Court · Aug 22, 1893

Brown with this endorsement: “I herewith approve above sale. “The Bank of California. “.Thomas Brown.” … This proposition is very clearly stated in the eases of Middleton v. Findla, 25 Cal. 76 ; Gonzales v. Broad, 57 Cal. 224 ; Duffy v. Hobson, 40 Cal. 244 ; 6 Am. Rep. 617 ; Phelan v. Gardner, 43 Cal. 311 ; Phelps v.

San Jose Teachers Assn. v. Superior Court

38 Cal. 3d 839 · California Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1985

Allen (1963) 373 U.S. 113 [ 10 L.Ed.2d 235 , 83 S.Ct. 1158 ] (Allen); Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, supra, 431 U.S. 209 (Abood); and Ellis v. Brotherhood of Railway etc. … (Dean v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. (9th Cir. 1983) 708 F.2d 486, 487 , cert. den. 464 U.S. 995 [ 78 L.Ed.2d 685 , 104 S.Ct. 490 ]; see also Browne v. Milwaukee Bd. of Sch.

People v. Williams

184 Cal. 590 · California Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1920

Brown, went to the Hall of Justice and procured a warrant for the arrest of defendant. Later she and Mrs. Brown started for the apartment of deceased, taking a street-car for the comer of Church and Seventeenth Streets. … As we said in People v.

Vega Aircraft v. Industrial Accident Commission

27 Cal. 2d 529 · California Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1946

Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1924), 193 Cal. 413, 421 [ 224 P. 754 ]; Associated Indem. Corp. v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1941), 18 Cal.2d 40, 44 [ 112 P.2d 615 ]; Smith v. Industrial Acc. … Petitioner relies upon Taylor v. Industrial Acc.

In Re Pfahler

150 Cal. 71 · California Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1906

(Panhallow v. Doane’s Admr., 3 Dall. 93 , [Fed. Cas. No. 10,925]; Brown v. State, 5 Colo. 499 .) … (Board of Education v. Board of Trustees, 129 Cal. 599 , [ 62 Pac. 173 ].)

Scott v. Times-Mirror Co.

181 Cal. 345 · California Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1919

Exhibit 6, which appeared in the editorial column, is an attack on the plaintiff as a member of the board of education, in opposition to his candidacy for re-election to the board. … H. 289; Williams v. Hicks Printing Co., 159 Wis. 90 , [ 150 N. W. 183 ]; Downs v. Cassidy, 47 Mont. 471 , [Ann. Cas. 1915B, 1155, 133 Pac. 106 ]; Smith v. Brown, 97 S. C. 239, [ 81 S. E. 633 ]; Vial v.

Jones v. Title Guaranty Etc. Co.

178 Cal. 375 · California Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1918

(Stonesifer v. Kilburn, 94 Cal. 33 , [ 29 Pac. 332 ]; Banta v. Siller, 121 Cal. 414 , [ 53 Pac. 935 ].) … Such a venture does not constitute a partnership (Coward v.

Paduveris v. Paris

213 Cal. 169 · California Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1931

(Brown v. Brown, 170 Cal. 1 [ 147 Pac. 1168 ]; Brown v. Brown, 170 Cal. 8 [ 147 Pac. 1171 ]; Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Welch, 202 Cal. 312 [ 260 Pac. 545 ].) … In Brown v. Brown, 170 Cal. 1 [ 147 Pac. 1168 ], a default decree of divorce silent as to community property was held to constitute an adjudication that there was no community property.