Case law

In Re Bailleaux

47 Cal. 2d 258 · California Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1956

Brown, Attorney General, and Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent. SHENK, J. By this petition for the writ of habeas corpus, Paul R. Bailleaux seeks his release from Folsom prison. … In November, 1943, the board suspended the petitioner's parole pending investigation of the parole officer's charges and ordered that he be retaken and returned to custody to abide the further order of the board.

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of Carpenters

25 Cal. 3d 317 · California Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1979

(Miller v. Board of Public Works (1925) 195 Cal. 477, 490 [ 234 P. 381 , 38 A.L.R. 1479 ]; Associated Home Builders etc., Inc. v. … Sears relies on Labor Board v.

Wulfjen v. Dolton

24 Cal. 2d 878 · California Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1944

Proc., § 581; Brown v. Sterling Furniture Co., 175 Cal. 563 [ 166 P. 322 ]; McColgan v. Jones, Hubbard & Donnell, Inc., 11 Cal.2d 243 [ 78 P.2d 1010 ]; Lewis v. … (Blake v. Blake, supra.)

Metcalf v. County of San Joaquin

72 Cal. Rptr. 3d 382 · California Supreme Court · Feb 21, 2008

(Williams v. Horvath (1976) 16 Cal.3d 834, 838 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 453 , 548 P.2d 1125 ].)” (Brown v. Poway Unified School Dist. (1993) 4 Cal.4th 820, 829 [ 15 Cal.Rptr.2d 679 , 843 P.2d 624 ] (Brown).) … (See Lugtu v.

In Re Minnis

7 Cal. 3d 639 · California Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1972

Any official or board vested with discretion is under an obligation to consider all relevant factors (cf. People v. … (See Bailey v. State (1930) 23 Ala.App. 369 [ 125 So. 693 ]; O’Day v. People (1946) 114 Colo. 373 [ 166 P.2d 789, 790-791 ]; People v.

Hufford v. Dye

162 Cal. 147 · California Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1912

(Smith v. Hawkins, 110 Cal. 122, 127 , [ 42 Pac. 453 ].) … A. 667, 45 Pac. 160 ]; Smith v. Corbit, 116 Cal. 587 , [ 48 Pac. 725 ]) in principle there is no reason why it should not be made applicable as between claimants by appropriation.

Covarrubias v. Bd. of Supervisors of Santa Barbara Cty.

52 Cal. 622 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1878

People v. Williams

16 Cal. 4th 635 · California Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1997

(See People v. Brown (1993) 6 Cal.4th 322, 335 [ 24 Cal.Rptr.2d 710 , 862 P.2d 710 ].) … (People v. Brown, supra, 6 Cal.4th at p. 335, italics omitted.)

Wilson v. City of Los Angeles

54 Cal. 2d 61 · California Supreme Court · May 4, 1960

(See Board of Education v. Mass, supra, 47 Cal.2d 494; Steinmetz v. California State Board of Education, 44 Cal.2d 816 [ 285 P.2d 617 ]; Pockman v. Leonard, supra, 39 Cal.2d 276 ; Christal v. Police Commission, 33 Cal. … App.2d 564 [ 92 P.2d 416 ] ; see also Garner v. Los Angeles Board of Pullic Works, 341 U.S. 716 [ 71 S.Ct. 909 , 95 L.Ed. 1317 ] ; Gerende v.

Montgomery v. Meyerstein

195 Cal. 37 · California Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1924

(Montgomery v. … Lumber Co. v. Ocean Beach Hotel Co., 94 Cal. 217 [ 28 Am. St.

In Re Pacific Coast Bldg.-Loan Assn.

15 Cal. 2d 134 · California Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1940

And quoting from People v. … The case of Greva v.

Wheat v. Bank of California

119 Cal. 4 · California Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1897

It is now claimed by Seale and his attorney that Brown so agreed to do. … There appears to be some evidence in the record appertaining to an injunction issued in an action entitled Bisbee v. Richter, but we attach no importance to it.

Knox & Requa v. Marshall

19 Cal. 617 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1862

By the agreement between Brown and Barnes for working the farm on shares, they became tenants in common of the grain and hay until a division was made. (Bernal v. Hovious, 17 Cal. 545 .) … In the recent case of Bickerstaff v.

People v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty.

228 Cal. Rptr. 3d 394 · California Supreme Court · Feb 1, 2018

(E.g., People v. Conley, supra, 63 Cal.4th at p. 656; People v. Brown (2012) 54 Cal.4th 314, 324.) … (People v. Brown, supra, 54 Cal.4th 314 (Brown).)

Ex Parte Clarke

126 Cal. 235 · California Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1899

As was said by Lord Camden in the celebrated case of Entick v. Carrington, 19 How. St. … In Hoyt v. American Exchange Bank, 8 How.

Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. County of Alameda

12 Cal. 3d 772 · California Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1974

(See Braniff Airways v. Nebraska Board (1954) supra, 347 U.S. at p. 593, fn. 4 [ 98 L.Ed. at p. 973 ].) … I, § 10, cl. 2; Brown v. Marvland (1827) 25 U.S. (12 Wheat.) 419 [ 6 L.Ed. 678 ].) This contention is likewise without merit.

Gorman v. Gorman

134 Cal. 378 · California Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1901

(Eslinger v. Eslinger, 47 Cal. 62 ; Brown v. Brown,. 60 Cal. 579 .) … We find the cases of Eslinger v. Eslinger, 47 Cal. 62 , and Brown v.

In Re Atiles

33 Cal. 3d 805 · California Supreme Court · May 16, 1983

In People v. … In People v.

Bradshaw v. California Employment Stabilization Commission

46 Cal. 2d 608 · California Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1956

In Ackerson v. Western Union Tel. … . ___ [ 114 A.2d 359 ]; see Keystone Mining Co. v. Unemployment Comp. Board of Review, 167 Pa.Super. 256 [ 75 A.2d 3 ].

People v. Ansell

108 Cal. Rptr. 2d 145 · California Supreme Court · Jun 14, 2001

V, § 8, subd. (a); see Brown, The Quality of Mercy (1993) 40 UCLA L.Rev. 327, 328-332.) … Board of Architectural Examiners, supra, 17 Cal.4th 763, 784-787 , and cases cited; Rubio v. Superior Court, supra, 24 Cal.3d 93, 101 ; People v. King, supra, 22 Cal.3d 12, 21 .)