Case law

McCarroll v. Los Angeles County District Council of Carpenters

49 Cal. 2d 45 · California Supreme Court · Sep 13, 1957

Workers v. National Labor Relations Board, 341 U.S. 694, 698-706 [ 71 S.Ct. 954 , 95 L.Ed. 1299 ]; National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Bldg. & Constr. … Some light is thrown on this question by Brown v.

Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los Angeles

2 Cal. 3d 285 · California Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1970

(See Adkins v. Brett (1920) 184 Cal. 252, 258-259 [ 193 P. 251 ]; Brown v. Affonso (1959) 185 Cal.App.2d 235, 239 [ 8 Cal.Rptr. 156 ].) … Levy Brothers (1941) 18 Cal.2d 798, 809-810 [ 117 P.2d 841 ] (evidence offered generally; motion to strike based on incorrect grounds); Brown v.

People v. Rigney

55 Cal. 2d 236 · California Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1961

A trial judge may examine witnesses to elicit or clarify testimony (People v. Corrigan, 48 Cal.2d 551, 555 [ 310 P.2d 953 ]; People v. Ottey, 5 Cal.2d 714, 721 [ 56 P.2d 193 ]; People v. … (People v. Campbell, 162 Cal.App.2d 776, 787 [ 329 P.2d 82 ]; People v. Lancellotti, 147 Cal.App.2d 723, 731 [ 305 P.2d 926 ]; People v. Huff, 134 Cal.App.2d 182, 187-188 [ 285 P.2d 17 ]; People v.

Kugler v. Yocum

69 Cal. 2d 371 · California Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1968

(Dominguez Land Corp. v. Daugherty (1925) 196 Cal. 468, 484 [ 238 P. 703 ] ; see also State Board of Dry Cleaners v. … Brown (1943) 317 U.S. 341, 352 [ 87 L.Ed. 315, 326 , 62 S.Ct. 307 ]; Floresta, Inc. v. City Council (1961) 190 Cal.App.2d 599 , 610 fn. 4 [ 12 Cal.Rptr. 182 ] and cases cited therein.)

Williams v. Field Transportation Co.

28 Cal. 2d 696 · California Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1946

(Ballard v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, ante p. 357 [ 170 P.2d 465 ].) … (Brooks v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 27 Cal.2d 305 [163 P.2d 689]; Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Ry.

Shipley v. Larrimore

1 Cal. Unrep. 297 · California Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1866

The defendant was not a member of the board, and consequently the rules and customs mentioned had no application to him. The plaintiff has cited and relies on the case of Whitehouse v. Moore, 13 Abb. Pr. (N. … Y.), 230, 231; Wheeler v. Newbould, 16 N. Y. 392 ; Brown v. Ward, 3 Duer (N. Y.), 660; Lewis v. Graham, 4 Abb. Pr. (N. Y.) 106.

In Re Dannenberg

23 Cal. Rptr. 3d 417 · California Supreme Court · Jan 24, 2005

(See People v. … People v.

Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

103 Cal. Rptr. 2d 672 · California Supreme Court · Feb 1, 2001

J., Baxter, J., Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred. … (Minn. 1990) 457 N.W.2d 175, 182-183 ; Brown Group, Inc. v. George F. Brown & Sons (Mo.Ct.App. 1997) 963 S.W.2d 285, 287-288 ; Ryan v. Royal Ins.

McDonald v. Superior Court

43 Cal. 2d 621 · California Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1954

Sell, 252 N.Y. 400, 403 [ 169 N.E. 624 ] ; State v. District Court, 112 Mont. 253 [ 114 P.2d 1047, 1051 ]; Brown v. … (Horton v. Benson, (Tex.Civ.App.) 266 S.W. 213, 217 ; Stroud v. Board of Water Commrs., 90 Conn. 412 [ 97 A. 336, 337 ]; Commonwealth v. Henry, 229 Mass. 19 [ 118 N.E. 224, 225 , L.R.A. 1918B 827 ] ; Chiarello v.

In Re Mark L.

34 Cal. 3d 171 · California Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1983

In People v. … Similar results were reached in People v. Oaxaca, supra, 39 Cal.App.3d 153, 161-166 (conviction and sentence on negotiated plea) and People v. Surety Ins.

Williams & Fickett v. Cnty. of Fresno

218 Cal. Rptr. 3d 362 · California Supreme Court · Jun 5, 2017

(See Olson v. … Henne v.

Bates v. Gregory

3 Cal. Unrep. 170 · California Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1889

Brown, 65 Cal. 583 , 4 Pac. 25, 625 , 26 Pac. 281 . … City of Sacramento, 10 Saw. 33 , 19 Fed. 580 ; Meyer v. Porter, 65 Cal. 67 , 2 Pac. 884 ; and Meyer v. Brown, supra.

Jacobs v. Bd. of Supervisors of S.F.

100 Cal. 121 · California Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1893

McDougall v. Bell, 4 Cal. 177 ; and it has been applied here in many subsequent cases. … And the same declaration was made by this court in Spring Valley Water Works v. San Francisco, 82 Cal. 286 , 16 Am. St.

Horton v. Jack

126 Cal. 521 · California Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1899

(Benson v. Shotwell, 103 Cal. 163 .)” … (Liptrot v. Holmes, 1 Ga. 381 , quoted in the opinion on the first appeal.) The answer in this case did not deny that the property belonged to the estate of plaintiff’s intestate, James A.

Westbrook v. Mihaly

2 Cal. 3d 765 · California Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1970

(See, e.g., Brown v. Board of Education (1954) 347 U.S. 483, 492 [ 98 L.Ed. 873, 879 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 38 A.L.R.2d 1180 ].) … Board of Supervisors (1965) 63 Cal.2d 343 [ 46 Cal.Rptr. 617 , 405 P.2d 857 ] and Silver v. Brown (1965) 63 Cal.2d 270 [ 46 Cal.Rptr. 308 , 405 P.2d 132 ]. See Williams v.

Haight v. Vallet

89 Cal. 245 · California Supreme Court · May 27, 1891

In Brown v. … (People v. Valencia, 43 Cal. 552 ; McCreery v. Everding, 44 Cal. 246 ; Chidester v. Con. P. D. Co., 53 Cal. 57 ; Bank of Stockton v. Bliven, 53 Cal. 708 ; People v. Wong, 54 Cal. 154 ; Aguirre v.

English v. Bd. of Supervisors of Sacramento

19 Cal. 172 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1861

Bertch v. Social Welfare Department

45 Cal. 2d 524 · California Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1955

Petitioners rely upon Laisne v. California State Board of Optometry, 19 Cal.2d 831 [ 123 P.2d 457 ], and Drummey v. … argues that the question of "need" is one of fact for the board and cites Newbold v.

Hollywood Turf Club v. Daugherty

36 Cal. 2d 352 · California Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1950

It was held valid (Matter of Brown, 156 Cal. 632 [ 105 P. 739 ]), and has been amended from time to time and exists today in a more elaborate form. … (Stats. 1933, p. 2046; Southern California Jockey Club v. California Horse Racing Board, ante, p. 167 [ 223 P.2d 1 ].)

Houghton v. Superior Court

187 Cal. 661 · California Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1922

In the case of Brown v. Campbell, 100 Cal. 635 , [ 38 Am. St. … Brown, supra, should control. The supreme court, in Department One, in passing upon this claim (Brown v.