Case law

Guru Nanak Sikh Society of Yuba City v. County of Sutter

326 F. Supp. 2d 1140 · District Court, E.D. California · Nov 19, 2003

Plaintiff brings suit against the County of Sutter and its Board of Supervisors, as well as Casey Kroon, Dennis Nelson, Larry Mun-ger and Dan Silva, each sued in their official capacities as members of the Sutter County Board … On May 21, 2002, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on the appeal.

(PC)Robles

District Court, E.D. California · Jan 6, 2026

State Water Resource Control Board as Defendant 19 Under the Eleventh Amendment, the State of California and its agencies, which includes 20 the State Water Resource Control Board are immune from federal … .”); Dittman v. California, 191 F.3d 1020, 1025–26 (9th Cir. 1999) (the State of 24 California has not waived its Eleventh Amendment immunity for federal claims under section 25 1983); Brown v.

San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United States Department of the Interior

624 F. Supp. 2d 1197 · District Court, E.D. California · May 14, 2009

Wilderness Soc’y v. Dombeck, 168 F.3d 367 , 377 (9th Cir.1999) (citing Nat’l Wildlife Fed’n v. Burford, 871 F.2d 849 , 855 (9th Cir.1989)). … V.

Gorton v. Todd

793 F. Supp. 2d 1171 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 29, 2011

Moreover, the court is informed by its experience presiding over Coleman v. Brown, 2:90-cv-520-LKK-JFM (E.D.Cal.), and the Three Judge Court convened in Coleman and Plata v. Brown, C01-1351 (N.D.Cal.). … Brown v. Plata, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 1910 , 179 L.Ed.2d 969 (2011).

Raheem Jones, et al. v. City of Sacramento Board of Supervisors, et al.

District Court, E.D. California · Dec 8, 2025

See Orand v. United 24 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). … See Robbins v.

Association of Irritated Residents v. C & R Vanderham Dairy

435 F. Supp. 2d 1078 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 16, 2006

Moreover, a decision that Vanderham does not need to obtain a permit falls outside the scope of hearing board review. … Porter v. Board of Trs. of Manahattan Beach Unified Sch. Dist., 307 F.3d 1064, 1070 (9th Cir.2002); Tomas v. Rubin, 926 F.2d 906, 911 (9th Cir.1991); Morrison-Knudsen Co. v.

Puckett v. County of Sacramento

District Court, E.D. California · Sep 25, 2024

Board of County Comm’rs. of 11 12 Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997). … S.E.C. v.

California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. All Star Auto Wrecking, Inc.

860 F. Supp. 2d 1144 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 16, 2012

Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 , 94 S.Ct. 1683 , 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974), overruled on other grounds by Davis v. Scherer, 468 U.S. 183 , 104 S.Ct. 3012 , 82 L.Ed.2d 139 (1984); Cruz v. … In Ecological Rights Foundation v.

Ryan Tatara v. Sacramento County Jail, et al.

District Court, E.D. California · Aug 4, 2026

See 2 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). Rather, the plaintiff must set forth 3 specific facts as to each individual defendant’s causal role in the alleged constitutional 4 deprivation. … See Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 11 397, 403 (1997). Thus, municipal liability must rest on the actions of the municipality, and not of 12 the actions of its employees or officers. See id.

Raheem Jones, et al. v. City of Sacramento Board of Supervisors, et al.

District Court, E.D. California · Oct 1, 2025

Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 27 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988). … See 2 | Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002); Fed. R. Civ.

Defazio v. Hollister, Inc.

636 F. Supp. 2d 1045 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 29, 2009

In light of these circumstances, a factfinder could reasonably infer that the Hollister Board’s limited annual monitoring of HolliShare trustees was insufficient. See Leigh v. … V 13.)

Marshall v. Heringer Ranches, Inc.

466 F. Supp. 285 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 23, 1979

Marshall v. Silver Creek Packing Co., supra. … Browning, Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Plaintiff appeared by Norman S.

Raheem Jones, et al. v. City of Sacramento Board of Supervisors, et al.

District Court, E.D. California · Oct 31, 2025

Bautista v. … See Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53-54 5 (9th Cir. 1995) (dismissal for noncompliance with local rule); Ferdik v.

Delano Farms Co. v. California Table Grape Commission

546 F. Supp. 2d 859 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 31, 2008

California Milk Advisory Board, 185 F.3d 969 (9th Cir.1999), and Cal Almond Inc. v. U.S. … The Commission also cites Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of University of Virginia, 515 U.S. 819 , 115 S.Ct. 2510 , 132 L.Ed.2d 700 (1995) and Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v.

Gilmore v. Union Pacific Railroad

857 F. Supp. 2d 985 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 8, 2012

In Stevenson v. … This is a special board of adjustment, which resolves disputes that are otherwise referred to the National Railroad Adjustment Board. Employees Protective Ass’n v.

Frontier Enterprises, Inc. v. Amador Stage Lines, Inc.

624 F. Supp. 137 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 2, 1985

The decision of the review (appellate) board indicates that Frontier raised at least some of these contentions in its appeal from the decision of the joint board (trial tribunal). … After the review board affirmed the joint board’s decision, Frontier filed a petition for review with the Ninth Circuit, but the parties later stipulated to a voluntary dismissal of that petition.

Keene v. Meese

619 F. Supp. 1111 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 29, 1985

Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95 , 92 S.Ct. 2286, 2290 , 33 L.Ed.2d 212 (1972), “limit,” Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Service Commission, 447 U.S. 530, 535 , 100 S.Ct. 2326, 2332 , 65 L.Ed.2d 319 (1980), Brown v. … West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 642 , 63 S.Ct. 1178, 1187 , 87 L.Ed. 1628 (1943). See also, Wallace v.

(PS) Reedy v. State of California

District Court, E.D. California · Aug 18, 2021

Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1, 15 (1890); Sofamor Danek Group, Inc. v. Brown, 124 6 F.3d 1179, 1183 (9th Cir. 1997). This immunity extends to state officers who act on behalf of the 7 state. … See Id. at 159-60; Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v. 15 Brown, 674 F.3d 1128, 1134 (9th Cir. 2012). Such a connection to overcome Eleventh 16 Amendment immunity “must be fairly direct[.]”

George v. Sullivan

721 F. Supp. 2d 938 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 15, 2010

Sufficient evidence supports the board action.” Answer Exhibit 2. … People v. Miller, 18 Cal.3d 873, 886 , 135 Cal.Rptr. 654 , 558 P.2d 552 (1977); People v. Beamon, 8 Cal.3d 625, 640 , 105 Cal.Rptr. 681 , 504 P.2d 905 (1973); see also People v.

McINTOSH v. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA UNIVERSAL ENTERPRISES COMPANY

670 F. Supp. 2d 1069 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 30, 2009

Brown (“Mr. … Brown/Legacy.