Case law

United States v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc.

987 F. Supp. 1277 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 28, 1997

Dist. v. Dorothy B. … In United States v.

Board of Trustees of IBEW Local 100 Pension Trust Fund v. Trinity Construction Enterprises, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California · Feb 7, 2025

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BOARD … Hallett v. 28 Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 751 (9th Cir. 2002).

Cisneros

District Court, E.D. California · Nov 7, 2025

Brown, the hearing official, 17 threatened Plaintiff with C-Status and loss of property if Plaintiff did not plead guilty to the RVR. 18 Defendants C. Brown, T. Dunn, M. Valdez, and D. … Gov’t Code § 900.6. 1 Brown v. Ransweiler, 171 Cal. App. 4th 516, 526 (2009). Where the defendant is a peace officer, 2 the plaintiff must also prove that the use of force was unreasonable. Ransweiler, 171 Cal.

Central Valley Chrysler-Jeep v. Witherspoon

456 F. Supp. 2d 1160 · District Court, E.D. California · Sep 25, 2006

Ass’n v. … Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 350-51 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943). This is because the Sherman Act does not evince Congress’s intent to “nullify a state’s control over its officers and agents.”

Guerrero v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.

231 F. Supp. 3d 797 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 3, 2017

ECF No. 13 at 18, 23 (citing Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. C 08-5221 SI, 2013 WL 1701581 , at *5 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2013); Gonzalez v. Fallanghina, No. 16-cv-01832-MEJ, 2016 WL 3951655 , at *6 (N.D. Cal. … In Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores, No. C. 08-5221 SI, 2013 WL 1701581 at *7 (N.D. Cal.

Turner v. Hickman

342 F. Supp. 2d 887 · District Court, E.D. California · Sep 30, 2004

V. … U.S. v.

Greenlow v. California Department of Benefit Payments

413 F. Supp. 420 · District Court, E.D. California · Jan 16, 1976

E. g., Francisco Enterprises Inc. v. Kirby, 482 F.2d 481 (9th Cir. 1973). The SPB has such a status. See e. g., Shepard v. State Personnel Board, 48 Cal.2d 41 , 307 P.2d 4 (1957); Boren v. … State Personnel Board, 37 Cal.2d 634 , 234 P.2d 981 (1951).

Palla v. L M Sports, Inc.

388 F. Supp. 3d 1191 · District Court, E.D. California · May 17, 2019

Churchill v. F/V Fjord , 5 F.3d 374 , 376 (9th Cir. 1993). … Holzhauer v.

United States v. Sealey

630 F. Supp. 801 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 6, 1986

In Bomher v. … In Cooper v.

Keker v. Procunier

398 F. Supp. 756 · District Court, E.D. California · Aug 8, 1975

Spokane County, 393 F.2d 330 (9th Cir. 1968); Brown v. … Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 , 43 S.Ct. 625 , 67 L.Ed. 1042 (1923); Greene v. McElroy, 360 U.S. 474 , 79 S.Ct. 1400 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1959); Board of Regents v.

(PC) Tri v. Gutierrez

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 6, 2025

See Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 931 n.7 (9th Cir. 2004). … by the disciplinary board) 4 | (emphasis in original).

Poole v. Rourke

779 F. Supp. 1546 · District Court, E.D. California · Dec 23, 1991

None of the instructions to the Board are in the record. Perhaps most significant, it cannot be determined whether the Board received any instructions regarding probation and rehabilitation. … Brown, 497 F.Supp. 173, 178 (D.Md.1980).

United States v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc.

987 F. Supp. 1233 · District Court, E.D. California · Sep 30, 1997

W.D.Mich.1994) (“all liabilities” “reflected or reserved against on the December 31, 1979 balance sheet” or “disclosed in the Disclosure Letter” or “existing on the Closing Date” does not include later CERCLA liability); Browning-Ferris … Indus. of Ill., Inc. v.

Board of Trustees of IBEW Local 100 Pension Trust Fund v. Trinity Construction Enterprises, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California · Sep 10, 2024

TRAINING TRUST FUND; [PROPOSED] STIPULATED BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF NECA/IBEW PROTECTIVE ORDER 12 FAMILY MEDICAL CARE TRUST FUND; BOARD OF … v. Trinity Construction Enterprises, Inc., Case No. 8 21:23−CV−01048−ADA−BAM.

Fontana v. ALPINE COUNTY

750 F. Supp. 2d 1148 · District Court, E.D. California · Sep 30, 2010

In Pitts v. … In Streit v.

Cheryl D. Dresdner, et al. v. Sacramento County Jail, et al.

District Court, E.D. California · Mar 10, 2026

For example, parole board officials enjoy absolute immunity from suit “when 16 processing parole applications.” Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1302 (9th Cir.), cert. 17 denied, 454 U.S. 1102 (1981); Brown v. … Ivey v. 4 Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982).

Tuttle v. Combined Insurance

222 F.R.D. 424 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 17, 2004

See Shepherd v. American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. 62 F.3d 1469, 1477 (D.C.Cir.1995); Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir.1989). … Hutton & Co. v. Brown, 305 F.Supp. 371 (S.D.Tex.1969) in support of their argument that an attorney/client relationship existed. E.F. Hutton does not support their argument. The facts in E.F.

Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of Bakersfield

634 F. Supp. 656 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 31, 1986

In accordance with legislative authorization found in section 38742 of the California Government Code, defendant adopted ordinances creating a water board and giving the Board certain powers and duties. … In Scott v.

(PC) Calderon v. Bonta

District Court, E.D. California · Mar 25, 2024

Parole Board Members 6 “[P]arole board members are entitled to absolute immunity [from damages] for parole 7 board decisions.” Brown v. Cal. … However, “circuit courts have long held that parole boards may not exclude an inmate 9 from consideration for parole based on race,” Thompson v.

Beentjes v. Placer County Air Pollution Control District

254 F. Supp. 2d 1159 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 27, 2003

In People v. … ); Kenny v.