Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscaed

9,021 results

1.13s

  • (HC) Brown v. North Kern State Prison Warden

    District Court, E.D. California · Sep 8, 2020

    Brown v. Ahern, 676 F.3d 899, 903 (9th Cir. 2012) (internal quotation marks 24 omitted) (quoting Carden v. Montana, 626 F.2d 82, 84 (9th Cir. 1980)). … People v. Brown, No. 8 E074151 (Cal. Ct. App. filed Nov. 21, 2019).2 Petitioner has not made any showing of 9 extraordinary circumstances that would render abstention inappropriate.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PS)Tanksley v. Sacramento Room & Board

    District Court, E.D. California · Mar 25, 2021

    Dougherty v. … 1 The complaint does not allege whether “Sacramento Room and Board” is a municipal or private 26 defendant.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (HC) Zinman v. California Board of Parole Hearings

    District Court, E.D. California · Jul 21, 2025

    See Valdez v. Montgomery, 918 F.3d 687, 693 (9th Cir. 2019); 25 Boyd v. Thompson, 147 F.3d 1124, 1127 (9th Cir. 1998). … See 1 O’Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838, 845 (1999); Duncan v. Henry, 513 U.S. 364, 365 (1995). 2 The burden of proving exhaustion rests with the petitioner. Darr v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (HC) Brown v. North Kern State Prison Warden

    District Court, E.D. California · Oct 21, 2020

    v. … basis”); Bernhardt v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Maestas v. Office Department Appeals Corrections Board

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 5, 2025

    ORDER RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL 14 OFFICE DEPARTMENT APPEALS WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF’S CORRECTION BOARD, FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE 15 … See 14 Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014); Martinez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (HC) Brown v. North Kern State Prison Warden

    District Court, E.D. California · Oct 7, 2020

    BROWN, No. 1:20-cv-01043-NONE-EPG-HC 12 Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, DISMISSING 13 v. … Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (quoting Barefoot v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Quair v. Board of Supervisors

    District Court, E.D. California · May 18, 2020

    Doe I v. … Board of Supervisors 4 Plaintiff names the “Board of Supervisors” as a defendant. 5 A local government unit may not be held responsible for the acts of its employees under

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wonderful Nurseries LLC v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

    District Court, E.D. California · Jul 1, 2025

    ORDER CONSOLIDATING RELATED CASES 14 AGRICULTURAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, et al., … Indus., Inc v. U.S. Dist. Court for Cent. Dist. Of Cal., 503 23 F.2d 384, 389 (9th Cir. 1974))).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • MacY v. Dalton

    853 F. Supp. 350 · District Court, E.D. California · May 12, 1994

    This is not a situation, as plaintiffs argue, in which they merely failed to comply with the intricacies of administrative procedure, see Brown v. … Stache, 852 F.2d at 1234; Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d at 14-15 . When a plaintiff fails to adhere to administrative claim requirements this purpose is undermined.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Cuadra v. George Brown Sports Club-Palm, Inc.

    District Court, E.D. California · May 11, 2020

    ) JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER Plaintiff, ) FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 12 ) v. … P. 41(a)(1); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 5 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. 6 | ITIS SO ORDERED.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (HC) Zinman v. California Board of Parole Hearings

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 25, 2025

    Rule 4 of the 2 Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; see also Hendricks v. … See 11 O’Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838, 845 (1999); Duncan v. Henry, 513 U.S. 364, 365 (1995). 12 The burden of proving exhaustion rests with the petitioner. Darr v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PS) Sharma v. SITOA Board Members

    District Court, E.D. California · Feb 5, 2020

    Baker v. … See Noll v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bonner v. Medical Board of California

    District Court, E.D. California · Nov 30, 2020

    No. 2:17-cv-00445-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. 14 Medical Board of California, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Attorney Allen Hassan … United States v. 6 Carter, 560 F.3d 1107, 1113 (9th Cir. 2009).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Maestas v. Office Department Appeals Corrections Board

    District Court, E.D. California · Jul 2, 2025

    Id. at 2–4 (applying Malone v. U.S. Postal Serv., 833 F.2d 128, 133 (9th Cir. 1987) 1 (failure to comply with a court order)); see also Henderson v. … See, e.g., Anderson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Western Growers Association v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

    District Court, E.D. California · Jul 1, 2025

    18 (2) The board has not proceeded in the manner required by law … Ass’n v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wonderful Nurseries LLC v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

    District Court, E.D. California · Jul 1, 2025

    18 (2) The board has not proceeded in the manner required by law … Ass’n v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown

    District Court, E.D. California · Dec 15, 2025

    Bruns v. NCUA, 122 F.3d 1251, 1257 (9th Cir. 1997); see also 12 California ex. rel. Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc., 375 F.3d 831, 838 (9th Cir. 2004). … Caterpillar, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Allison

    District Court, E.D. California · Nov 21, 2025

    See Brown v. Young, No. 1:25-cv-1306 SAB (PC). The case 21 was then transferred to the Sacramento Division. See Brown v. … Young, No. 1:25-cv-1306 SAB (PC) and Brown v. 26 Young, No. 2:25-cv-2864 SCR. Fed. R.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PS) Peoples v. Navy Board Annex

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 16, 2020

    (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an 18 action challenging a decision by the Department of the Navy’s Board for Correction of Naval 19 Records denying Plaintiff’s application to upgrade his … See Orand v. United 4 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 5 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified Sch.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PS) Peoples v. Navy Board Annex

    District Court, E.D. California · Apr 21, 2020

    Jachetta v. United States, 653 F.3d 898, 908 (9th Cir. 20111). The Navy Board Annex is 23 a federal agency, not a state actor that may be sued under § 1983. … Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 2 | v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.