Opinion

Cuadra v. George Brown Sports Club-Palm, Inc.

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
May 11, 2020
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.4%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

10 ) Case No. 1:17-CV-01063 DAD EPG

MARIO CUADRA, )

11 ) JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER

Plaintiff, ) FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

12 )

v. ) (ECF No. 136)

13 )

GEORGE BROWN SPORTS CLUB- )

14 PALM, INC.; GEORGE BROWN SPORTS )

CLUB, INC; JOHNSTON )

15 CONTRACTING, INC.; and DOES 1 )

THROUGH 100, )

16 )

Defendants. )

17 )

)

18 )

)

19 )

)

20 AND RELATED THIRD-PARTY )

ACTIONS. )

21

22 The parties to this action, acting through counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

23 Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) hereby stipulate, in consideration of a negotiated settlement executed

24 by them, to the Dismissal With Prejudice of this action, including all claims and counterclaims

25 stated herein against all parties, with each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs.

26 //

27 //

28 //

1 Dated: May 8, 2020 By: /S/ Steven S. Dias

STEVEN S. DIAS

2 Attorney for Plaintiff, Mario Cuadra

3

4

Dated: May 8, 2020 By: /S/ Anthony N. DeMaria

5 ANTHONY N. DeMARIA

Attorney for Defendants, Third Party

6 Plaintiff, Cross-Claim Plaintiff, GEORGE

BROWN SPORTS CLUB PALM LLC,

7 et al.

8

9

Dated: May 8, 2020 By: /S/ T. Patrick Long

10 T. PATRICK LONG or

WARREN B. CAMPBELL

11

Attorney for Defendant/Cross

12 Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff,

JOHNSTON CONTRACTING, INC.

13

14

Dated: May 8, 2020 By: /S/ Kathleen C. Miller

15

PATRICK K. O’BRIEN or

16 KATHLEEN C. MILLER or

BATKHAND ZOLJARGAL

17 Attorney for Third Party

Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff/

18

KENNETH GLEN CLARK dba CLARK

19 INSTALLATION.

20

Dated: May 8, 2020 By: /S/ Alice Chen Smith

21 ALICE CHEN SMITH

Attorney for Third Party Plaintiff/ Third

22

Party Defendant Defendant/Cross

23 Defendant, WCM, INC. dba TEC SPEC,

INC.

24

25

26

27

28

4:68 UV VEAL SOM PO ee OY VI

1 ORDER

2 The parties have filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice (ECF No.

3 136). In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed.

4 R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).

5 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case.

6 | ITIS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _ May 8, 2020 [Jee ey ——

8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.