Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,306 results
1.14s
Fite v. Shamrock Foods Company
District Court, E.D. California · Nov 29, 2021
If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 6 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) … This provision is not intended to modify 21 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 22
Cited 0 timesUnknownShasta Resources Council v. United States Department of the Interior
629 F. Supp. 2d 1045 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 7, 2009
The FLPMA and the Redding Resource Management Plan The FLPMA defines BLM’s land management authority and “establishes systems for information gathering and land use planning.” Or. … This result would clearly conflict with BLM’s perception of the public interest.
Cited 5 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 2, 2019
Because the court finds plaintiff has failed to state 17 a claim under section 8547.13, it need not address the question of judicial immunity. 18 B. … Constitution did not establish federal due 16 process claim); cf. Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 30, 2019
moved for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, ` 2 arguing that the move was not objectively dangerous, that the defendants were not subjectively 3 indifferent to any danger, that Smith cannot establish … causation, and that defendants Torres and 4 Hoggard are entitled to qualified immunity.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Apr 6, 2021
13 with final authority to establish that policy.” … established constitutional right to receive visits, in particular 8 contact visits.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Dec 12, 2023
Title II of the 8 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) provides that “no qualified individual with a disability 9 shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of 10 … Mere negligence on the part of the 3 prison official is not sufficient to establish liability.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Apr 8, 2024
Thus, Plaintiff's complaint does not establish 5 diversity jurisdiction. 6 2. … Thus, Plaintiff's complaint does not establish federal question jurisdiction. 22 IV.
Cited 0 timesUnknown(PC) Mancuso v. Sacramento County Jail
District Court, E.D. California · Jul 8, 2025
complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner raised claims that are legally 8 “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek 9 monetary relief from a defendant who is immune … Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1060 (9th Cir. 2004) (negligence 22 constituting medical malpractice is not sufficient to establish an Eighth Amendment violation). 23 V.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 26, 2019
moved for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, 21 arguing that the move was not objectively dangerous, that the defendants were not subjectively 22 indifferent to any danger, that Smith cannot establish … causation, and that defendants Torres and 23 Hoggard are entitled to qualified immunity.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGarcia v. Los Banos Unified School District
418 F. Supp. 2d 1194 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 17, 2006
The law is established. … Supervisors and coworkers who do not qualify as employers are not individually liable for violations of Title VII. Miller v. Maxwell’s International Inc., 991 F.2d 583, 587 (9th Cir.1993).
Cited 16 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. California · Dec 14, 2021
(Id. at 4.) 3 It is well-established that inmates have a right to file grievances against correctional 4 officers. See Watison v. … Plaintiff’s allegations establish that defendants Brown and 6 Tsui took an adverse action against him in response to the protected conduct of attempting to file 7 a grievance.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Mar 7, 2023
If only a portion 15 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 16 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 17 in the margins … Then, before producing 27 the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the “CONFIDENTIAL” 1 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 2 identify the protected
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jun 11, 2025
performing this screening function, the court must dismiss any claim that “(1) is frivolous, 7 malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (2) seeks monetary relief 8 from a defendant who is immune … A 14 showing of merely negligent medical care is not enough to establish a constitutional violation. 15 Frost v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Oct 30, 2019
“Clearly Established Federal Law” 12 The phrase “clearly established Federal law” in § 2254(d)(1) refers to the “governing 13 legal principle or principles” previously articulated by the Supreme … Only Supreme Court precedent may constitute “clearly established 15 Federal law,” but courts may look to circuit law “to ascertain whether . . . the particular point in 16 issue is clearly established by Supreme Court
Cited 0 timesUnknownSanchez v. County of Sacramento
District Court, E.D. California · Jun 4, 2021
The party seeking to compel discovery has the initial burden to establish that its 22 request is proper under Rule 26(b)(1). … The work product doctrine is not a privilege, but a qualified 23 immunity used to protect documents that have been prepared by a party or his representative in 24 anticipation of litigation from disclosure during discovery
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jan 15, 2025
In order to establish a claim 14 for disability discrimination under FEHA, a plaintiff must allege and show that: (1) plaintiff 15 suffers from a disability; (2) plaintiff is otherwise qualified to do his job; and (3) … In order to 13 establish a claim for failure to accommodate under FEHA, a plaintiff must allege and 14 show that: (1) plaintiff has a disability; (2) plaintiff is qualified to perform the essential 15 functions of the
Cited 0 timesUnknown(PS) Dowglas v. Metro Goldwyn - Mayer
District Court, E.D. California · Oct 16, 2023
IFP statute requires federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally 23 “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks 24 monetary relief from a defendant who is immune … The exact nature of what happened to plaintiff 21 is unclear from the complaint, which does not contain any clearly identifiable facts explaining 22 how plaintiff’s rights were violated.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Sep 30, 2019
the case at any time if it determines the 22 allegation of poverty is untrue, or if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on 23 which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune … Should plaintiff choose to file an amended complaint, the 10 amended complaint shall clearly set forth the allegations against each defendant and shall specify 11 a basis for this court’s subject matter jurisdiction.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Dec 1, 2025
In 2 reviewing a complaint under this standard, the court accepts as true the factual 3 allegations contained in the complaint, unless they are clearly baseless or fanciful, and 4 construes those allegations in the … Congregation Pidyon Shevuyim, N.A., 639 F.3d 21 916, 922 (9th Cir. 2011) (citation omitted). 22 Here, Plaintiff has not alleged sufficient facts to establish significant state 23 involvement
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Nov 6, 2020
19 However, while defendants are immune from suit for damages, because Tripp sought only injunctive and declaratory relief, 20 defendants were not entitled to immunity. … Moreover, it does not appear that defendant Chappell was qualified to render 4 this diagnosis.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna