Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,021 results
1.61s
District Court, E.D. California · Apr 3, 2026
Petitioner has appealed 21 the decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals, which has not yet resolved the appeal. … In Jennings v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Feb 2, 2026
The Government then filed a notice of 24 automatic stay with the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). (Pet. at 2.) … See 19 Melendres v. Arpaio, 695 F.3d 990, 1002 (9th Cir. 2012); Baird v. Bonta, 81 F.4th 1036, 20 1042 (9th Cir. 2023); Pinchi v. Noem, 792 F. Supp. 3d 1025, 1037 (N.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 27, 2026
(quoting Brown 23 v. Berryhill, No. 17-cv-02834-JCS, 2018 WL 4700348, at *17 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 29, 2018))). 24 Beyond the first listed reason for rejecting Dr. … Dec. 3, 2021) (“the ALJ must build an accurate and logical bridge from the evidence 2 to their conclusions”); see also Brown-Hunter v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Dec 5, 2023
Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133, 141 (2005) (citing Williams, 529 U.S. at 405- 8 406). 9 In Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 101 (2011), the U.S. … Moses 16 v. Payne, 555 F.3d 742, 758-59 (9th Cir. 2009); see also Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown311 F. Supp. 197 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 27, 1970
However, as the court in Durand v. … See Bell v. Redwine. 98 Cal.App. 784 , 277 P. 1050 (1929) ; 34 Cal.Jur.2d, Mortgages and Trust Deeds § 724 (1957). . See Spaulding v. Howard, 121 Cal. 194 , 53 P. 563 (1898). . Bell v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jun 9, 2026
Thompson v. … 17 Brown, No. 1:23-cv-01068-JLT-SAB.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Sep 3, 2021
See Mazurek v. … Improvement v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 7, 2023
Am., Inc. v. U.S. Dist. Court for 28 the Cent. Dist. of Cal., 24 F.3d 1545, 1555-56 (9th Cir. 1994), overruled on other 1 | grounds by California Dept. of Water Resources v. … See Brady v. Brown, 51 F.3d 810, 815-16 (9th Cir. 4 | 1995) (“The operative facts for both the RICO and the state law claims are the same 5 || actions described ...
Cited 0 timesUnknown(SS) Hernandez Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. California · Apr 11, 2023
Celaya v. Halter, 332 F.3d 1177, 1183 (9th Cir. 2003) (quoting Brown 20 v. … Mayes v. Massanari, 276 F.3d 453, 459–60 (9th Cir. 2001); Bayliss v. Barnhart, 427 25 F.3d 1211, 1217 (9th Cir. 2005) (citing 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1512(e), 416.912(e)); see also Brown v. 26 Berryhill (Brown), 697 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · May 12, 2025
Information is 23 relevant if it is “reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence,” Surfvivor 24 Media, Inc. v. … Survivor Prods., 406 F.3d 625, 635 (9th Cir. 2005) (quoting Brown Bag Software 25 v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1465, 1470 (9th Cir. 1992)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownLindsey Shaw v. City of Portola, et al.
District Court, E.D. California · Nov 20, 2025
See Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 12 397, 403 (1997). Thus, municipal liability must rest on the actions of the municipality, and not of 13 the actions of its employees or officers. See id. … Harbury, 536 U.S. at 414-18; 17 Urmancheev, 2019 WL 1904818, at *2; Kabede v. Brown, No. 2:16-cv-1765 DB (P), 2017 WL 18 714300, at *6 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2017). 19 Cal. Civ.
Cited 0 timesUnknownH.W.J. Designs for Agribusiness, Inc. v. Rethceif Enterprises, LLC
District Court, E.D. California · Oct 25, 2019
(Doc. 145) 12 RETHCEIF ENTERPRISES, LLC A/K/A RETHCEIF PACKAGING, AND L.P. 13 BROWN COMPANY, INC. … Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corp., 658 F.3d 1150, 1162 5 (9th Cir. 2011); see also Nixon v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Feb 19, 2025
Id. at 494 n.5; U.S. 7 S.E.C. v. Hyatt, 621 F.3d 687, 693 (7th Cir. 2010). … Forsythe v. Brown, 26 281 F.R.D. 577, 587 (D. Nev. 2012) report and recommendation adopted, No. 3:10-CV-00716- 27 RCJ, 2012 WL 1833393 (D. Nev. May 18, 2012).
Cited 0 timesUnknown314 F. Supp. 171 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 15, 1970
itself appears to support plaintiff’s position, the Supreme Court has always recognized the power of a state under the Amendment to prohibit or regulate the distribution and sale of liquor within its borders. 3 In State Board … In Ziffrin Inc. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jun 30, 2025
El-Shaddai v. Zamora, 833 F.3d 1036, 1044 (9th Cir. 2016) 6 (quoting Thompson v. Drug Enf't Admin., 492 F.3d 428, 438 (D.C. … Jones v. L.A. Cent. Plaza LLC, 74 F.4th 1053, 1059 (9th Cir. 2023).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · May 12, 2025
Information is 23 relevant if it is “reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence,” Surfvivor 24 Media, Inc. v. … Survivor Prods., 406 F.3d 625, 635 (9th Cir. 2005) (quoting Brown Bag Software 25 v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1465, 1470 (9th Cir. 1992)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownTerrence Brewer v. California State Bar, et al.
District Court, E.D. California · Mar 11, 2026
16 17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this action against the State Bar of California, its Board … The State Bar’s Board of Trustees and 13 Committee of Bar Examiners enjoy the same immunity. Lupert v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJafet Perez Rodriguez v. California City Processing Center
District Court, E.D. California · May 28, 2026
Leonardo v. … (quoting SEC v. G.C.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jun 25, 2025
Martinez v. 1 Roberts, 804 F.2d 570, 571 (9th Cir. 1986); Chua Han Mow v. United States, 730 F.2d 1308, 2 1313 (9th Cir. 1984); Ruviwat v. Smith, 701 F.2d 844, 845 (9th Cir. 1983). … Brown v. Rison, 895 F.2d 533, 535 (9th Cir. 5 1990). Thus, “because exhaustion is not required by statute, it is not jurisdictional.” Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jun 8, 2026
That decision was affirmed by the Board of Immigration 9 Appeals (BIA) in a decision rendered September 29, 2025. … Ambriz v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna