Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscaed

9,021 results

3.25s

  • Anthony Rogers, et al. v. Mountain Valley Unified School District, et al.

    District Court, E.D. California · Nov 7, 2025

    Franklin v. … Turner v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ayala v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services

    216 F. Supp. 3d 1073 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 19, 2016

    Robertson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 749 F.2d 530, 533-34 (9th Cir. 1984). … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • (HC) Coats v. Barr

    District Court, E.D. California · Feb 18, 2021

    Brown v. Rison, 895 F.2d 533, 535 (9th Cir. 1990). Thus, “because exhaustion 3 is not required by statute, it is not jurisdictional.” Id. … Martinez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Kendrid v. Yahiya

    District Court, E.D. California · Apr 14, 2025

    Palmer v. … In the motion for appointment of counsel, 13 || plaintiff failed to address whether he may be deposed at the board and care facility where he now 14 | lives.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Leroy Ralph Whitfield v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, E.D. California · Sep 18, 2025

    Moisa v. … Brown-Hunter v. 13 Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 493 (9th Cir. 2015) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). 14 “The fact that a claimant’s testimony is not fully corroborated by the objective medical 15 findings

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Baltierra v. Warden - North Kern State Prison

    District Court, E.D. California · Apr 18, 2023

    See 26 Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 354 (1996) (explaining Bounds v. … See Brown v. Reif, 2019 WL 989874, at *2 (E.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (HC) Banks v. Sherman

    District Court, E.D. California · May 4, 2021

    (Id. at 3) (citing Langford v. Day, 110 F.3d 1380, 1389 (9th Cir. 1996)). … Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (quoting Barefoot v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Nasir v. Lee

    District Court, E.D. California · Mar 16, 2020

    See 7 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 8 The Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause protects prisoners from being deprived 9 of liberty without due process of law. … Madrid, 5 889 F.Supp. at 1273–74; see also Cato v. Rushen, 824 F.2d 703, 705 (1987) (evidence relied upon 6 by a prison disciplinary board must have “some indicia of reliability”).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (HC) Hubbard v. United States

    District Court, E.D. California · Jul 25, 2023

    Burton v. Stewart, 549 U.S. 147, 152 (2007); Cooper v. … See, e.g., Hubbard v. People of the State of California, No. 19 1:20-cv-00226-DAD-JLT (dismissed as successive); Hubbard v. Brown, et al., No. 1:18-cv- 20 00181-LJO-SKO (same); Hubbard v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (HC) James v. Sacramento County Sheriff

    District Court, E.D. California · Mar 6, 2024

    (citing Younger, 401 U.S. 44- 12 45); Nichols v. Brown, 945 F. Supp. 2d 1079, 1096 (C.D. Cal. 2013) (The state must be permitted 13 to enforce its laws). … Brown v. Ahern, 676 10 F.3d 899, 901 (9th Cir. 2012) (citing Carden, 626 F.2d at 84).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PS) Bryan v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

    District Court, E.D. California · Jan 24, 2023

    On October 27, 2021, the TRPA legal committee considered the 4 appeal and voted to recommend denial of the appeal to the Governing Board. AR II at 337. Later 5 the same day, the Board denied the appeal. … Plaintiff argued to TRPA’s 8 Governing Board that the USACE Letter was “valid authorization,” but the Governing Board, 9 after briefing from TRPA staff and the Legal Committee, determined that the USACE Letter did 10

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (SS) Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 5, 2025

    Barnhart, 278 F.3d 947, 958 10 (9th Cir. 2002).3 11 Citing Brown-Hunter v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 493 (quoting Reddick v. Chater, 157 F.3d 715, 722 (9th 17 Cir.1998)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Shiloh v. County of Kern

    District Court, E.D. California · Oct 29, 2020

    Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 18 268 (9th Cir. 1982). … Brown v. City of Tucson, 336 F.3d 1181, 1186 (9th Cir. 28 2003). A "protected activity" is any activity through which a plaintiff pursues his rights under the 1 ADA. Pardi v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Morning Star Packing Co. v. SK Foods, L.P.

    754 F. Supp. 2d 1230 · District Court, E.D. California · Nov 17, 2010

    See DeSoto v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 957 F.2d 655, 658 (9th Cir.1992); Balistreri v. … Brown v. Safeway, Inc., 615 F.3d 1171, 1178 (9th Cir.2010).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • (DP) McWhorter v. Davis

    District Court, E.D. California · Oct 7, 2020

    Aug. 13, 2020) and Brown v. Davis, No. 1:19-cv- 01796-DAD, 2020 WL 5069654 (E.D. Cal. … See Cowan v. Davis, No. 1:19- 18 CV-00745-DAD, 2020 WL 4698968, at **5-6 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2020); Brown v. Davis, No. 19 1:19-CV-01796-DAD, 2020 WL 5069654, at ** 7-8 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2020).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Albarran

    District Court, E.D. California · Jul 24, 2026

    It appears that Respondents may be invoking DHS’ right to 3 automatically stay an IJ’s bond decision pending review by the Board of Immigration Appeals 4 (“BIA”). … release (on bond or otherwise) shall be stayed upon DHS's filing of a notice of intent 7 to appeal the custody redetermination”). 8 The Court finds the following excerpt from Herrera v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (HC) Alvarez v. Macomber

    District Court, E.D. California · Aug 8, 2023

    He notes that he is a 3 member of the class action suit in Brown v. Plata, 563 U.S. 493 (2011). Such claims are not 4 cognizable in a federal habeas action. … Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (quoting 6 | Barefoot v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Debeaubien v. State of CA

    District Court, E.D. California · Apr 26, 2021

    Sali v. … Quadrozzi v. City of New York, 127 F.R.D. 63, 73 (S.D. N.Y. 1989); see also Liew 9 v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Soliz

    District Court, E.D. California · Feb 7, 2025

    No. 1 at ¶¶ 7–9.) 8 Defendants Solizes and the California Franchise Tax Board have answered the complaint 9 (Doc. … Cripps v. Life Ins. Co. of 10 N. Am., 980 F.2d 1261, 1267 (9th Cir. 1992) (citing Danning v. Lavine, 572 F.2d 1386, 1388 (9th 11 Cir. 1978)); accord DIRECTV, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Zephyr v. Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc.

    873 F. Supp. 2d 1223 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 5, 2012

    Lee v. City of L.A., 250 F.3d 668, 689 (9th Cir.2001). … See Nat’l Ass’n of Optometrists & Opticians LensCrafters, Inc. v. Brown, 567 F.3d 521, 523 (9th Cir.2009). .

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.