Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,306 results
1.31s
Richards v. City of Citrus Heights
District Court, E.D. California · Oct 6, 2022
If only a portion 9 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 10 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 19 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 20 appropriate markings in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknownBrock v. Amazon.com Services LLC
District Court, E.D. California · Apr 22, 2024
Except as otherwise provided in this Order 1 Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so 2 designated before the material is disclosed or produced. 3 … If only a portion 7 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 8 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 9
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Nov 28, 2023
In reviewing a complaint under this standard, the 11 court will (1) accept as true all of the factual allegations contained in the complaint, unless they 12 are clearly baseless or fanciful, (2) construe those allegations … Accordingly, Title 18 of the United States Code does not establish any private right 10 of action and cannot support a civil lawsuit. See Aldabe v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownStanley E. Redick III v. Lowes Home Centers, LLC
District Court, E.D. California · Aug 5, 2021
Stahl, 254 F.3d 845 (9th Cir. 11 2001) (dismissal required of in forma pauperis proceedings which seek monetary relief from immune 12 defendants); Cato v. … Therefore, the one-year statute of limitations ran on November 7 10, 2019, and Plaintiff did not file the original action until January 5, 2021, which is clearly untimely. 8 2.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Feb 10, 2023
a ... policymaker possessed 25 with final authority to establish that policy.” … “An authorized deprivation is one carried out pursuant to established 25 state procedures, regulations, or statutes.” Id. (citing Logan v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Mar 25, 2022
If only a portion 24 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 25 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 6 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 7 appropriate markings in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Sep 3, 2025
complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner raised claims that are legally 8 “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek 9 monetary relief from a defendant who is immune … The court may, therefore, dismiss a claim as frivolous when it is based on an 13 indisputably meritless legal theory or where the factual contentions are clearly baseless. Neitzke, 14 490 U.S. at 327.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jul 15, 2025
As noted above, “[w]here the plaintiff contends that an 10 employer failed to accommodate by reassigning him or her to another position, ‘the plaintiff 11 proves he or she is a qualified individual by establishing that … In its reply, KAG West, citing Estrada’s initial 9 application to work at KAG West, asserts that Estrada’s work experience at IKEA does not 10 establish that Estrada was qualified to be a commercial vehicle dispatcher
Cited 0 timesUnknown99 F. Supp. 3d 1223 · District Court, E.D. California · Sep 9, 2015
The Court is confident that the California Legislature acted with the best of intentions in establishing the ACP. … To the contrary, the eases on which Defendants rely are clearly distinguishable. For example, in Schlesinger v. Ballard, 419 U.S. 498 , 95 S.Ct. 572 , 42 L.Ed.2d 610 (1975), and Rostker v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 28, 2020
P. 10 26(b)(2)(C). 11 “The party seeking to compel discovery has the burden of establishing that its request 12 satisfies the relevancy requirements of … qualify under CDCR’s Hepatitis C 17 Guidelines.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Oct 29, 2019
“Clearly Established Federal Law” 27 The phrase “clearly established Federal law” in § 2254(d)(1) refers to the “governing 28 legal principle or principles” previously articulated by the … Only Supreme Court precedent may constitute “clearly established 2 Federal law,” but courts may look to circuit law “to ascertain whether…the particular point in 3 issue is clearly established by Supreme Court precedent
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Apr 16, 2024
The court may, therefore, dismiss a claim as frivolous where it is based on an 12 indisputably meritless legal theory or where the factual contentions are clearly baseless. Neitzke, 13 490 U.S. at 327. … By establishing the existence of a serious medical need, a prisoner satisfies the 24 objective requirement for proving an Eighth Amendment violation. Farmer v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · May 23, 2023
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 14 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 15 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of 25 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 26 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 27
Cited 0 timesUnknownAsya Weston, et al. v. WIP 800 J Lofts, et al.
District Court, E.D. California · Sep 26, 2025
If you wish to file an amended complaint you must clearly explain what happened, 4 why the court has jurisdiction over your complaint, and what remedy you are seeking. 5 VI. … Plaintiffs 12 have established good cause. The Court therefore GRANTS plaintiffs permission to file 13 electronically under Local Rule 133(b)(2). (ECF No. 12.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Apr 22, 2024
However, a determination that a plaintiff qualifies financially for in forma 1 pauperis status does not complete the inquiry required by the statute. … Under this standard, a court must dismiss a 18 complaint as frivolous where it is based on an indisputably meritless legal theory or where the 19 factual contentions are clearly baseless.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 4, 2023
Clearly baseless factual 17 allegations include those “that are ‘fanciful,’ ‘fantastic,’ and ‘delusional.’ ” Denton, 504 U.S. at 18 32–33 (quoting Neitzke, 490 U.S. at 325, 32–28). … Regardless of whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice, a dismissal for failure to state a claim qualifies as a 28 strike under § 1915(g). Lomax, 140 S.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jan 27, 2020
If only a portion or portions of the material on 20 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 21 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the 3 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 4 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 5 margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Feb 18, 2022
If only a portion 16 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 17 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 18 … If only a portion or 26 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 27 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 28
Cited 0 timesUnknownGuerra v. Madera Police Department
District Court, E.D. California · Oct 21, 2024
The Court must dismiss a case that is frivolous or malicious, fails to 4 state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-iii … The amended complaint should be clearly and boldly 18 titled “First Amended Complaint,” refer to the appropriate case number, and be an original signed 19 under penalty of perjury.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jan 20, 2023
Ct. 1843 (2017), this Court cannot 11 create an individual damages remedy in this new context;” 2) The complaint fails to state a 12 claim; and 3) Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. … (ECF No. 62). 8 Plaintiff argues that his complaint does not fail to state a claim (id. at 7-9 & 19-20) and 9 appears to argue that Defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity (id. at 9-10 & 21). 10
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna