Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscaed

9,021 results

2.94s

  • Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land Management

    306 F. Supp. 2d 929 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 13, 2004

    Coalition of Ojai v. Brown, 72 F.3d 1411 , 1418 (9th Cir.1995). None of the facts cited by the plaintiffs show the agencies’ decision to be arbitrary and capricious. 5 G. … Sawmills, Inc. v. U.S.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Calvert v. Huckins

    875 F. Supp. 674 · District Court, E.D. California · Jan 13, 1995

    Throughout the years, officers and directors of CXP and Centex have maintained a substantial presence on Western’s Board of Directors. Wan-land Supplemental Deck, Exhs. A, B, C. … Inc. v.

    Cited 68 timesPublished
  • Warden

    District Court, E.D. California · May 29, 2026

    is permitted to seek review of such order by the 21 Board of Immigration Appeals.” 8 U.S.C.A. § 1101(47)(B). … Zadvydas v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Bland v. The People of the State of California

    District Court, E.D. California · May 8, 2020

    (dismissed May 2, 2019, for failure to state a claim); 26 (2) Bland v. Brown, Case No. 1:18-cv-01358-AWI-JDP (E.D. Cal.) … Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 21 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • General Security Services Corp. v. County of Fresno

    815 F. Supp. 2d 1123 · District Court, E.D. California · Sep 2, 2011

    Reinke informed GSS that, before instituting a lawsuit against the County, GSS was required to file a claim with the County’s governing board. … Spinks v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • (PS) Lull v. County of Sacramento

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 22, 2020

    Phillips ex rel. 22 Estates of Byrd v. … (quotations omitted). 21 Here, there is no dispute that Frost is an elected member of the Sacramento County Board 22 of Supervisors.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Roberson v. T.

    District Court, E.D. California · Sep 9, 2022

    Hammler v. Haas, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49377, *3-4, 2019 WL 118880444 (E.D. Cal., 14 Mar. 22, 2019). See also Mitchell v. Haviland, 2015 U.S. … Brown v. Gilmore, 533 U.S. 1301, 1303, 122 S.Ct. 1, 150 L.Ed.2d 782 (2001) (citations 23 and internal quotation marks omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Leonard Yuseph Balza Coronel v. Warden, California City Detention Center

    District Court, E.D. California · Jul 2, 2026

    Barrientos Vasquez v. Warden, No. 1:26- 5 cv-03190-DAD-CKD (HC), 2026 WL 1693818, at *2 (E.D. Cal. … ); 8 Gomez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (HC) Bouie v. Gastelo

    District Court, E.D. California · Feb 10, 2020

    See Bouie v. … Martinez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (HC) Casteel v. Von Sluepth

    District Court, E.D. California · Sep 23, 2020

    Clark v. Washington, 366 F.2d 678, 681 7 (9th Cir. 1966). See also Davis v. … Brown v. Ahern, 676 F.3d 899, 903 (9th Cir. 2012) (internal quotation marks 21 omitted) (quoting Carden v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PS) Davis v. CA Public Employee Retirement System

    District Court, E.D. California · Sep 15, 2021

    But the Eleventh Amendment bars suits seeking money damages from 11 states.1 See Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. … See Hess v. Port Auth.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Pallares

    District Court, E.D. California · Dec 15, 2025

    Brown, 640 F.3d 1063, 1070 (9th Cir. 2011) (court accepts as true all material allegations in the 1 complaint, as well as any reasonable inferences to be drawn from them). See also Starr v. … Starr v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PS) Conerly v. Kaiser Permanente

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 7, 2021

    Brown v. California Dept. of Corrections, 554 F.3d 747, 752 (9th Cir. 2 2009) (quoting Dittman v. … “The administrative agency authorized to adjudicate unfair labor 13 practice charges under the MMBA is the California Public Employment Relations Board 14 (PERB).” (Id.)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ayan Abdul Wakil v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility, et al.

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 10, 2026

    Diouf v. … While that is correct, Respondents 7 incorrectly argue that the Supreme Court in Zadvydas v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Urmancheev v. Ndoh

    District Court, E.D. California · Mar 11, 2021

    See 27 Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 354 (1996) (explaining Bounds v. … See Brown v. Reif, 2019 18 WL 989874, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2019) (denying appointment of counsel where the plaintiff’s 19 filing demonstrate ability to properly litigate case despite mental illness).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Noem

    District Court, E.D. California · Dec 11, 2025

    In Zadvydas v. … Carvajal, 69 F.4th 1059 (9th Cir. 2023); Badea v. 21 Cox, 931 F.2d 573 (9th Cir. 1991), Brown v. Blanckensee, 857 F. App’x 289 (9th Cir. 2021), and 22 Alcala v. Rios, 434 F. App’x 668 (9th Cir. 2011).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Debeaubien v. State of CA

    District Court, E.D. California · Oct 18, 2021

    .”); E.E.O.C. v. California Psychiatric 5 Transitions, 258 F.R.D. 391, 394-95 (E.D. … Shields v. Amerigas Propane, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-0754 KJM 19 EFB, 2015 WL 5436772, at *5 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 15, 2015).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Natural Resources Defense Council v. Norton

    236 F. Supp. 3d 1198 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 23, 2017

    Control Board Decision 1641] may be in conflict in the coming season and requesting the Board’s assistance in determining appropriate contingency measures and exercising their authorities *1235 to put these measures in place … Council v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • (PC) Petillo v. Galliger

    District Court, E.D. California · Jul 20, 2022

    (Doc. 83 at 15-16 (citing e.g., Collins v. Goord, 438 F. 28 Supp. 2d 399, 411, n.13 (S.D.N.Y. 2006); Brownell v. … Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Parker, Jr. v. Crown Equipment Corporation

    District Court, E.D. California · May 16, 2022

    P. 37(d)(1)(A)(i) (“The 17 court where the action is pending may, on motion, order sanctions if a party . . . fails, after being 18 served with proper notice, to appear for that person’s deposition[.]”); Rushing v. … Board of Sup’rs 19 of the University of Louisiana System (Southeastern Louisiana University), Civil Action No. 06- 20 623-RET-SCR, 2008 WL 4330186, at *2 n13 (M.D. La.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.