Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,021 results
3.21s
District Court, E.D. California · Aug 16, 2021
See Sprague v. Brown, 2:17-cv-00938-KJM-GGH (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2017); Sprague 24 v. Phillips, 2018 WL 1470566 (E.D. Cal. March 26, 2018); Sprague v. … Corp. v. 25 Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007); see Ashcroft v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDemetrio A. Quintero II v. Merced Unified School District
District Court, E.D. California · Oct 27, 2021
Doe I v. … Wilkerson v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jun 1, 2023
Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133, 141 (2005) (citing Williams, 529 U.S. at 405- 17 406). 18 In Harrington v. … Cato v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAssociation of Irritated Residents v. Fred Schakel Dairy
634 F. Supp. 2d 1081 · District Court, E.D. California · Jul 22, 2008
Board. of Trustees of the Univ. of Ill., 219 F.3d 674, 676 (7th Cir.2000). … Porter v. Board of Trustees of Manhattan Beach, 307 F.3d 1064, 1070 (9th Cir.2002); see also Hoeft v.
Cited 30 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 10, 2026
Doerr 17 v. … See, e.g., Luna v. Cambra, 20 306 F.3d 954 (9th Cir. 2002); Brown v. Myers, 137 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir. 1998). 21 C.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRena Triano v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. California · Mar 4, 2026
[in 20 August 2018 she] went paddle boarding and ice skating.” AT 42, citing AT 813. … AT 38; see Glanden v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAnthony Rogers, et al. v. Mountain Valley Unified School District, et al.
District Court, E.D. California · May 19, 2026
(cleaned up) (quoting Breier v. Northern California Bowling 10 | Proprietors’ Ass’n, 316 F.2d 787, 789-90 (9th Cir. 1963)). … Defendants Mountain Valley Unified School District and Mountain Valley Unified 17 | School District Board of Education’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 41) is GRANTED without 18 | leave to amend; 19 3.
Cited 0 timesUnknown(SS) Eugenia K. Mcgovran v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. California · Mar 24, 2021
v. … Brown–Hunter 3 also is distinguishable because, as discussed below, the Court is able to “reasonably discern” the 4 ALJ’s path. See, e.g., Green v. Saul, No. 1:19-cv-00058-BAM, 2020 WL 1227895, at *10 (E.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknown(HC) Singh v. Warden, Mesa Verde ICE Processing Center
District Court, E.D. California · Nov 26, 2024
See Doe v. Garland, 109 F.4th 1188. … See City of Mesquite v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 17, 2026
Breach of Implied Warranty 18 Defendants argue, and plaintiff appears to concede, that his implied warranty claim is 19 foreclosed under Brown v. … See Maloney v. Am. Pharm. Co., 207 Cal. App. 3d 282, 287 21 (Ct. App. 1988) (“Brown further establishes that ‘a cause of action for breach of warranty does 22 not lie against a prescription drug manufacturer.’”).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Nov 22, 2019
, defendant Martinez allowed Pantoja to board the bus without searching him or wanding 7 him for metal. … Jeffers v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 26, 2020
See Chrysler Corp. v. 4 Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 316 (1979). … Hamby v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJoel Scates v. Warden of the Mesa Verde Detention Facility
District Court, E.D. California · Jun 25, 2026
See Singh v. Garland, 117 F.4th 1145, 1149 (9th Cir. 7 2024); Arredondo v. Lynch, 824 F.3d 801, 803 (9th Cir. 2016); Monjaraz-Munoz v. I.N.S., 327 8 F.3d 892, 893 (9th Cir. 2003). … See 22 Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHoward Herships v. The City of Rancho Cordova, et al.
District Court, E.D. California · Jan 6, 2026
See Steel Co. v. … See Buchanan v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown(PC) Sullivan v. Adult Correctional Health Care
District Court, E.D. California · Sep 29, 2022
Vance v. … Farmer v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jul 14, 2026
Brown, 2013 WL 6491529, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2013). 1 Program (“HCPOP”) unit so that plaintiff can be housed at CMF or Stockton because plaintiff 2 was no longer assigned the EOP level of care. … V. CONCLUSION 12 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 13 1. Plaintiff's motion to amend (ECF No. 50) is DENIED without prejudice. 14 2.
Cited 0 timesUnknown951 F. Supp. 172 · District Court, E.D. California · Dec 12, 1996
Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club, 463 U.S. 680, 685 , 103 S.Ct. 3274, 3277 , 77 L.Ed.2d 938 (1983); see also Lauritzen v. … School Board, 416 U.S. 696 , 94 S.Ct. 2006 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974).
Cited 3 timesPublishedWare v. Golden 1 Credit Union, Inc.
375 F. Supp. 3d 1145 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 25, 2019
Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v. … Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior Univ. , 489 U.S. 468 , 478-79, 109 S.Ct. 1248 , 103 L.Ed.2d 488 (1989). *1150 Ware acknowledges that post- Volt courts have both incorporated and declined to incorporate the
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 3, 2021
In particular, the findings and recommendations concluded that 25 petitioner does not challenge his conviction; rather, petitioner “challenges the decision of the 26 California Board of Parole Hearings (“Board”) finding … him unsuitable for parole,” a claim which 27 is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Swarthout v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna