Case law

(PS) Rhee v. Alvarez

District Court, E.D. California · Nov 15, 2022

RHEE, No. 2:18-CV-0105-DAD-DMC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. … State 9 Defendants primarily argued that the Court should decline to exercise jurisdiction under Younger 10 v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). See ECF No. 12-1.

(SS) Donna Murphy v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California · Aug 21, 2019

See Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 493 11 (quoting Reddick v. … Brown v. Heckler, 713 F.2d 441, 443 (9th Cir. 1983). 9 Accord Tonapetyan, 242 F.3d at 1150; Smolen, 80 F.3d at 1288.

(PC) Lewis v. Quinto

District Court, E.D. California · Mar 4, 2025

This action proceeds against 19 Defendants Alan Guinto,1 Bobby Gilbert, and Shannon Brown (collectively, “Defendants”) for 20 violations of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights. 21 I. … See, e.g., Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (dismissal for 22 failure to comply with a court order to amend a complaint); Malone v. U.S.

(SS) Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California · Aug 13, 2025

Under Brown-Hunter v. … See Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 493.

Robinson v. Cnty. of Shasta

384 F. Supp. 3d 1137 · District Court, E.D. California · May 1, 2019

See Brown v. Grinder , No. 213CV01007 KJM KJN, 2019 WL 280296 , at *12 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2019) (describing integral participation theory) (citations omitted). … v.

(PC) Peterson v. Leekie

District Court, E.D. California · Sep 26, 2023

See Brown 17 v. Flores, No. 18-cv-01578 LHK, 2018 WL 9838120, at *2-*3 “(N.D. Cal. Oct. 2018); Jacobs v. 18 CDCR, No. 1:20-cv-00547-BAM (PC), 2021 WL 1264636, at *11 (E.D. Cal. … See Osolinski v. Kane, 92 F.3d 4 934, 938 (9th Cir. 1996); Mancinas v. Brown, 2018 WL 1109673, at *2 (E.D. Cal.

Hall

District Court, E.D. California · May 26, 2026

See Andrews v. … Brown, 757 F.3d 834, 840 (9th Cir. 2014) (“We have held that absolute immunity 4 || extend[s] to parole officials for the imposition of parole conditions because that task is integrally 5 | related to an official’s decision

Carlos Enrique Tojxitumul v. Warden of the Mesa Verde Detention Facility, et al.

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 22, 2026

See (Case No. 1:26-cv-01060- 28 JLT-CDB, Doc. 17). 1 Board of Immigration Appeals (Board), this Court will provide a memorandum to facilitate review of Respondent … See 4 | F.T.C. v.

(PC) Montgomery v. Culum

District Court, E.D. California · Jul 11, 2023

See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 25 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See 26 Robbins v. … While orders in Coleman 5 || illuminate the requirements of the Eighth Amendment as applied to seriously mentally ill inmates, 6 || see generally Coleman v. Brown, 28 F. Supp. 3d 1068 (E.D.

City of Lincoln v. County of Placer

District Court, E.D. California · Jan 23, 2023

ASARCO, LLC v. 1 Celanese Chemical Co., 792 F.3d 1203, 1208 (9th Cir. 2015) (citing California ex. rel. Cal. Dep’t. of 2 Toxic Substances Control v. Neville Chem. … BROWN JEFFREY T.

Sigona

District Court, E.D. California · Mar 6, 2026

Sonoma County Ass’n of Retired Emps. v. Sonoma 18 County, 708 F.3d 1109, 1117 (9th Cir. 2013) (quoting Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 19 (1962)). … Brown v. 20 Stored Value Cards, Inc., 953 F.3d 567, 574 (9th Cir. 2020). “Generally, this determination 21 should be performed with all inferences in favor of granting the motion.” Griggs v.

(PC) Stuckey v. Nestle Corporation

District Court, E.D. California · Aug 25, 2021

Pickett v. Brown, No. C- 11-0445-TEH, 2011 WL 3954553, at *1 (N.D. Cal. 2011) (citations omitted); see also Gann v. 1 Valley State Prison, No. 1:19-cv-01797-GSA, 2020 WL 70077, at *2 (E.D. … “A litigant appearing in propria persona has no authority to represent anyone other than 3 himself,” Russell v.

RAISIN BARGAINING ASSOCIATION v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co.

715 F. Supp. 2d 1079 · District Court, E.D. California · May 25, 2010

Plaintiffs Glen Goto and Monte Schütz are and were, at all times relevant to this action, members of the Board of Directors of RBA. (Complaint at 2). … Sanchez v.

Graphic Communications Conference-International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 404M v. Bakersfield Californian

541 F. Supp. 2d 1117 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 14, 2008

Seuss Enterprises, L.P. v. Penguin Books USA Inc., 109 F.3d 1394 , 1397 n. 1 (9th Cir.1997), quoting Big Country Foods, Inc. v. Board of Educ., 868 F.2d 1085 , 1088 (9th Cir.1989). III. … Co. v.

City of Lincoln v. United States of America

District Court, E.D. California · Aug 31, 2020

Anderson v. … (U.A.W.) v.

(PC) Lewis v. Quinto

District Court, E.D. California · Jan 3, 2024

, Correctional Officers (“COs”) at 23 North Kern State Prison, and claim for failure to protect against COs Brown and Hernandez. 24 (Docs. 15, 19, 20.) … See, e.g., Faultry v. Saechao, 2020 WL 2561596, at *2 (E.D.

BRYAN WILLIAMS v. SIERRA DONOR SERVICES, et al.

District Court, E.D. California · Nov 25, 2025

Casola v. … See Kuba v. 1–A Agric.

(HC)Stephen v. Matterson

District Court, E.D. California · Dec 20, 2023

See Fegan v. Arnold (1:16-cv-1142-SKO-HC); Fegan v. 20 Frauenheim (1:14-cv-01022-AWI-SMS HC); Fegan v. Brazelton (1:14-cv-00967-JLT HC); 21 Fegan v. Warden (1:11-cv-01863-LJO-JLT HC); Fegan v. … Jarvis v. Nelson, 440 19 F.2d 13, 14 (9th Cir. 1971). 20 III. COGNIZABLE GROUNDS FOR RELIEF 21 Citing Brown v.

Booth v. United States

District Court, E.D. California · Aug 30, 2022

He is also board 22 | certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.” /d. at 3. The United States does not 23 | oppose this motion. … Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149, 163-64 (1990); Coal. of Clergy, 1 | Lawyers, & Professors v. Bush, 310 F.3d 1153, 1161 (9th Cir. 2002).

(PC) Kidwell v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 27, 2022

Jimenez accused Plaintiff of 18 speaking “illegally through JPay” with Brown and that Plaintiff was there because he had 19 helped other inmates with their appeals and legal work, including helping Brown with “602 20 … The information Plaintiff and 17 Brown shared “in kite form and verbal[ly]” was about Brown’s appeals, concerning the 18 misconduct of Lepe.