Case law

Debeaubien v. State of CA

District Court, E.D. California · Apr 19, 2021

Gonzales v. Google, Inc., 234 F.R.D. 674, 5 679-80 (N.D. … See generally Pham v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 2:11-cv-1148 4 KJD GWF, 2011 WL 5508832, at *3 (D. Nev.

(PC) Tolliver v. County of Sacramento

District Court, E.D. California · Apr 28, 2020

See Bd. of County Comm'rs of Bryan Cty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 12 (1997). … Board of 15 Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 16 Finally, plaintiff is informed that the court cannot refer to a prior pleading in order to 17 make plaintiff’s amended complaint

Mazariegos Koosemans v. Siskiyou Joint Community College

District Court, E.D. California · Aug 23, 2021

The Superintendent subsequently made a recommendation to the Board of 10 Trustees (the “Board”) to eliminate the Spanish program, which the Board voted unanimously to 11 do. … Board’s Final Decision.”

(HC) Bland v. Warden

District Court, E.D. California · May 31, 2023

Brown v. Muniz, 889 F.3d 661, 667 (9th Cir. 27 2018). See also Magwood v. … See Brown, 889 15 F.3d at 667.

Moore v. Walmart Inc.

District Court, E.D. California · Sep 12, 2024

“[W]hen the 8 employee’s claim is based on conduct normally occurring in the workplace, it is within the 9 exclusive jurisdiction of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.” Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire 10 Prot. … See Schaffer v. GTE, Inc., 19 40 F.

(HC) Page v. Fisher

District Court, E.D. California · Jul 14, 2021

of Parole Hearings (the “Board”) denying parole. … Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 22 484 (2000) (quoting Barefoot v.

(PS) Bizhko v. McKinnon

District Court, E.D. California · Jul 28, 2021

Thus, 25 plaintiff cannot maintain this action against CDCR or the Parole Board. … Quasi-judicial 6 functions or those that are “functionally comparable to tasks performed by judges” exist where 7 parole board members adjudicate whether the grant, deny, or revoke parole. Swift v.

Jain Irrigation, Inc. v. Netafim Irrigation, Inc.

386 F. Supp. 3d 1308 · District Court, E.D. California · May 13, 2019

Brown , 936 F.2d 1042 , 1045 (9th Cir. 1991) ). … Jackson v. Bank of Haw. , 902 F.2d 1385 , 1387 (9th Cir. 1990) (citing Zenith Radio Corp. v.

Buick v. World Savings Bank

637 F. Supp. 2d 765 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 12, 2008

I, Federal Reserve Board Commentary to Paragraph 23(b). The Commentary is, at worst, persuasive evidence that both husband and wife are entitled to receive two copies of the Notices. … Neilson v.

(PC) Springfield v. CDCR

District Court, E.D. California · Nov 14, 2024

Goff v. Walters, No. 22 1:18-cv-00904-KES-HBK (PC), 2024 WL 1722251, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2024) (quoting 23 Latshaw v. Trainer Wortham & Co., Inc., 452 F.3d 1097, 1103 (9th Cir. 2006)). … See Brown v. Warden, No. 2:10-cv-02040- 26 MCE-KJN, 2011 WL 2559428, at *2 (E.D. Cal.

Bowers v. City of Porterville

District Court, E.D. California · May 9, 2024

Comm’rs of Bryan Cty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 400 17 (1997); Burke v. Cnty. of Alameda, 586 F.3d 725, 734 (9th Cir. 2009); Gibson v. Cnty. of 18 Washoe, Nev., 290 F.3d 1175, 1185-86 (9th Cir. 2002). … See, e.g., Brown v. Contra 24 Costa Cty., No. C 12-1923 PJH, 2014 WL 1347680, at *8 (N.D. Cal.

League to Save Lake Tahoe v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

739 F. Supp. 2d 1260 · District Court, E.D. California · Nov 24, 2010

The 2008 Shorezone Amendments On October 22, 2008, TRPA’s governing board adopted the Shorezone Amendments. AR 1:1-3. … TRPA’s executive director must present a plan for implementation of the Blue Boating Program by March 2009 and TRPA’s governing board (“Board”) must adopt an implementation plan by March 31, 2010. Code § 54.15.B(1).

(HC) Fond v. Diaz

District Court, E.D. California · Sep 23, 2021

Fond’s argument that this case is distinguishable from 28 Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922 (9th Cir. 2015) (en banc). … The 14 challenged report was only one factor the Board of Parole Hearings considered. See id. Ex. 1 at 15 3–4.

(PC) Jones v. Bal

District Court, E.D. California · Mar 6, 2020

See 22 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). … See Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 21 397, 403 (1997). Thus, municipal liability must rest on the actions of the municipality, and not of 22 the actions of its employees or officers. See id.

(PS) Wu v. Sacramento Unified School District

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 16, 2025

Doe I v. … See Lucas v.

(PC) Lewis v. Nagar

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 18, 2020

See Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997). Thus, municipal liability must rest on the actions of 27 the municipality, and not of the actions of its employees or officers. … See Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982).

(PC) Fregia v. Chen

District Court, E.D. California · Feb 6, 2023

United 27 States v. New York Tel. … Brown v. 11 Gilmore, 533 U.S. 1301, 1303 (2001) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). 12 III.

Rodriguez v. City of Fresno

819 F. Supp. 2d 937 · District Court, E.D. California · May 16, 2011

Brown v. Ransweiler, 171 Cal. App.4th 516, 526-527 , 89 Cal.Rptr.3d 801 (4th Dist.2009) (citing Piedra v. Dugan, 123 Cal.App.4th 1483, 1495 , 21 Cal.Rptr.3d 36 (2004)). … See Brown, 171 Cal.App.4th at 527 n. 10, 89 Cal.

Turner v. Calderon

970 F. Supp. 781 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 27, 1997

In People v. Brown, 40 Cal.3d 512 , 230 Cal.Rptr. 834 , 726 P.2d 516 (1985), rev’d on other grounds sub nom. California v. … Even Turner concedes that in many cases decided after Brown, the California Supreme Court has not found the absence of the recommended explanatory instructions to be reversible error. 29 Indeed, Brown, .itself did not find

(PC) Williams v. Hill

District Court, E.D. California · Aug 26, 2025

Id.; see also Board of Trustees of IBEW Local Union No. 100 17 Pension Trust Fund v. Fresno’s Best Indus. Elec., Inc., 2014 WL 1245800, at *4 (E.D. Cal. … Cal. 8 July 26, 2022); Rodriguez v. Brown, No. 1:15-cv-1754 LJO EPG PC, 2017 WL 1090161, at *2 9 (E.D. Cal.