Case law

Christensen v. Goodman Distribution, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California · Jan 8, 2021

McAndrew is a board-certified general adult psychiatrist with the American Board of Psychiatry and 20 Neurology. Dr. … McAndrew may have included therein, see Brown 7 v. Providence Med. Ctr., 2011 WL 4498824, at *1 (D. Neb. Sept. 27, 2011).

Quatro v. Tehachapi Unified School District

District Court, E.D. California · Mar 19, 2020

that the Board was merely told the payments were still unresolved. … Post- judgment interest on district court judgments is mandatory, Air Separation, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, 45 F.3d 288, 290 (9th Cir. 1995), including for fee awards under the IDEA, Gera v.

(PC) Coleman v. Newsom

District Court, E.D. California · Sep 3, 2020

Coleman v. Brown, 938 F. … Brown v.

Mukhamadii Abduvakhidov v. Warden, Golden State Annex Detention Facility, et al.

District Court, E.D. California · Jan 5, 2026

Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez, 596 U.S. 573, 575 (2022). … Spencer v.

(PC) Patton v. Loadholt

District Court, E.D. California · Nov 19, 2020

PATTON, No. 2: 19-cv-0451 KJM KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. … Walker v. Sumner, 14 F.3d 1415, 1422 (9th Cir. 1994) (internal 24 quotations and citation omitted), abrogated on other grounds by Sandin v.

Arden

District Court, E.D. California · Apr 1, 2026

United 18 States v. New York Tel. … Brown v.

(PC) Nolasco v. Rodriguez

District Court, E.D. California · Aug 16, 2023

Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). Rather, the plaintiff 15 must set forth specific facts as to each individual defendant’s causal role in the alleged 16 constitutional deprivation. See Leer v. … See Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. at 403. Plaintiff does not make the 6 necessary allegations. See ECF No. 1.

Sierra Club v. Babbitt

69 F. Supp. 2d 1202 · District Court, E.D. California · Jul 12, 1999

The court finds that the fact that Brown sent this letter in January of 1998 does nothing to preclude the imposition of lach-es in this case. … V.

Jackson v. City of Modesto

District Court, E.D. California · Oct 15, 2021

There is no 16 allegation that the Shooting Review Board examined the bodycam videos, but it is reasonably 17 inferred that the videos were reviewed by the board. … Brown v. Ransweiller, 171 Cal.App.4th 516, 523 n.6 (2009).

(DP) Clark v. Cueva

District Court, E.D. California · Jan 25, 2024

Stewart v. Boeing Co., No. CV 26 12-05621 RSWL, 2013 WL 3168269, at *1 (C.D. Cal. June 19, 2013) (citing Denney v. City of 27 Berkeley, No. C 02–5935 JL, 2004 WL 2648293, at *2-*3 (N.D. Cal. … The Selection Board, through Assistant Federal Defender 22 David Harshaw shall submit the Board’s recommendation of counsel to the 23 Court under seal by emailing it to ApprovedSealed@caed.uscourts.gov

(HC) Young v. Pfeiffer

District Court, E.D. California · Feb 26, 2020

On habeas review, “the federal court’s scope of review of parole board 8 decisions is very limited.” Pedro v. Oregon Parole Bd., 825 F.2d 1396, 1399 (9th Cir. 1987). … and an explanation of the parole board’s denial.

(PC) Casto v. Newsom

District Court, E.D. California · Jul 6, 2020

Farmer v. … Johnson v.

(HC) Barnes v. Lynch

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 12, 2023

Cooke, 562 U.S. at 220; see also 28 Miller, 642 F.3d at 717; Roberts v. … Greenholtz v.

Armstrong Ex Rel. Steffensen v. Alicante School

44 F. Supp. 2d 1087 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 19, 1999

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of “[w]hat is meant by the [IDEA’s] requirement of a ‘free appropriate public education’ ” in Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School Dist. v. … See Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343, 350 , 108 S.Ct. 614 , 98 L.Ed.2d 720 (1988); Gini v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep’t, 40 F.3d 1041, 1046 (9th Cir.1994) (citing Schneider v.

Waddell v. Meyer

District Court, E.D. California · Sep 6, 2022

Decisions of a military correction 6 board are reviewed under an “unusually deferential application of the ‘arbitrary and capricious' 7 standard” of the APA. Musengo v. White, 286 F.3d 535, 538 (D.C. Cir. 2002)). … “All that is 8 required is that the Board’s decision minimally contain a rational connection between the facts 9 found and the choice made.” Frizelle v. Slater, 111 F.3d 172, 176 (D.C.

(HC) Vigil v. Lizarraqa

District Court, E.D. California · Jan 19, 2021

of Parole Hearings 6 (“Board”) on January 8, 2019. … Id.; see also Miller v.

(PC) Van den Heuvel v. Strancener

District Court, E.D. California · Jul 27, 2023

See 20 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 21 II. … Gardner v. Brown, No. 2:18-cv-0741 MCE DB P, 2019 WL 2370266, at *1 (E.D. Cal. 25 June 15, 2019); Rio-Sosa v. Foulk, 2:14-cv-0727 DB P, 2017 WL 3720083, at *3 (E.d. Cal. Aug. 26 29, 2017).

Carbajal v. Fresno Police Department

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 17, 2022

Doe I v. … Dittman, 191 F.3d at 8 1025–26 (citing Atascadero State Hosp. v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 241 (1985)); see also Brown v. 9 Cal.

(PS) Rogers v. County of Sacramento

District Court, E.D. California · Feb 13, 2025

See Britt v. … The Court clarifies that the Government Claims Act does not require 4 Plaintiff to present her claim to the California Victims Compensation Board or the Government 5 Claims Board, as the magistrate judge suggests.

(SS) Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California · Jan 18, 2024

Brown-Hunter v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 494.