Case law

Carbajal v. Fresno Police Department

District Court, E.D. California · May 18, 2022

Doe I v. … Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 241 (1985)); see also Brown v. 26 Cal.

C&C Properties, Inc. v. Shell Pipeline Company

District Court, E.D. California · Sep 6, 2022

Co. v. … See Americold Realty Tr. v.

(PC) Carroll v. Newsom

District Court, E.D. California · Feb 17, 2023

See 12 Carroll v. State of California et. al., 2:18-cv-01832-SVW-JC (C.D. Ca. March 8, 2018); see also 13 Carroll v. A A Lamarque, 2:03-cv-09105-SJO-CW (C.D. Ca. … See Carroll v. CSP-LAC John Doe, 2:22-cv- 22 97754-VBF-DFM (C. D. Cal. October 25, 2022); Carroll v. State of California, 3:15-cv-01660- 23 GPC-JMA (S. D. Cal.

Cordova

District Court, E.D. California · Sep 29, 2025

Farmer v. Brennan, 3 511 U.S. 825, 833 (1994); Labatad v. Corrs. … Cervantez v.

United States v. State of California

District Court, E.D. California · Feb 26, 2020

12 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 2:19-cv-02142 WBS EFB 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. … Board Members 12 California statutorily provides for two voting members 13 to WCI, Inc.’s board of directors. See Cal. Gov.

Tankersley v. Arcand

District Court, E.D. California · Jan 6, 2021

Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY 14 v. … See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins.

(PS) Rhee v. Alvarez

District Court, E.D. California · Aug 27, 2019

Findings at 4 10 (citing Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir. 1989)); Sprague v. Med. Bd. of California 11 (MBC), 402 F. App’x 275, 276 (9th Cir. 2010) (citing Prod. & Leasing, Ltd. v. … See 11 Olsen, 363 F.3d at 925–26; Mishler v. Clift, 191 F.3d 998, 1007 (9th Cir. 1999); Gambee v. 12 Williams, 971 F. Supp. 474, 477 (D.

(PC) Bryant v. Duncan

District Court, E.D. California · Feb 17, 2021

Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). Rather, the plaintiff must set forth 7 specific facts as to each individual defendant’s causal role in the alleged constitutional 8 deprivation. See Leer v. … See Bd. of County 18 Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997). Thus, municipal liability must rest on the actions 19 of the municipality, and not of the actions of its employees or officers. See id.

Gloria Castaneda v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California · Sep 10, 2025

Brown-Hunter v. 16 Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 493 (9th Cir. 2015) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). 17 “The fact that a claimant’s testimony is not fully corroborated by the objective medical 18 findings … Webb v.

Powell v. Union Pacific Railroad

864 F. Supp. 2d 949 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 31, 2012

Plaintiff appealed his dismissal to the Railway Labor Board, which denied the appeal in its entirety. … The Railway Labor Board determined that “claimant was charged with being dishonest in connection with being able to perform the functions of his position.

Barboza v. California Ass'n of Professional Firefighters

144 F. Supp. 3d 1151 · District Court, E.D. California · Nov 17, 2015

Harlick v. Blue Shield of Cal., 686 F.3d 699, 719 (9th Cir.2012). … See Moore v. CapitalCare, Inc., 461 F.3d 1, 13 (D.C.Cir.2006).

Alo v. Goldsmith

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 28, 2023

Comm’rs of Bryan 20 Cty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 400 (1997); Burke v. County of Alameda, 586 F.3d 725, 734 (9th Cir. 2009); Gibson v. County of Washoe, Nev., 290 F.3d 1175, 1185-86 (9th Cir. 2002). … Brown v. Contra Costa Cty., No. C 25 12-1923 PJH, 2014 WL 1347680, at *8 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2014) (citing Clouthier v. Cty. of Contra Costa, 591 F.3d 1232, 1249-50 (9th Cir. 2010)).

(PS) Crocker v. County of Amador

District Court, E.D. California · Aug 9, 2023

Rogers v. Board of 15 Education, 261 Cal. App. 2d 355, 358 (1968). Even if an amendment is effective, however, the 16 “amendment shall be considered a part of the original claim for all purposes.” Cal. … Bd. of the County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403-404, 406-407 (1997); 1 Monell v. Dep’t of Soc.

Anthony Rogers, et al. v. Mountain Valley Unified School District, et al.

District Court, E.D. California · Apr 3, 2026

To the extent that a “school 5 board’s authority is coextensive with the authority of a school district under state law, a 6 school board in California is likewise a state agency for purposes of the Eleventh 7 Amendment … See Ivey v. Board of 2 Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982); see also Ashcroft v.

(PC) Cuellar v. Madera County Department of Corrections Health Care Provider

District Court, E.D. California · Jul 24, 2020

Jones v. … See Board of Cty. Comm'rs. 13 of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Tsao v.

(PC) Jones v. Speidell

District Court, E.D. California · Mar 12, 2021

Zepeda v. U.S. … Price v.

(PC) Sierra v. Covello

District Court, E.D. California · Oct 4, 2023

See Jackson v. … See Cato v.

(PC) Augustine v. Shirley

District Court, E.D. California · May 28, 2025

Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 939-41 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. … See Wallis v.

Irigaray Dairy v. Dairy Employees Union Local No. 17 Christian Labor Ass'n of the United State

43 F. Supp. 3d 1080 · District Court, E.D. California · Sep 2, 2014

Co. v. … MacKillop v.

United States v. Soliz

District Court, E.D. California · Jan 22, 2024

On October 2, 2023, the 28 1 California Franchise Tax Board (“FTB”) answered the complaint, stating that it “claims an 2 interest in” the Alexandra … Co., Ltd. v. 28 Rearden LLC, No. 15-cv-00797-JST, 2016 WL 5930289, at *13 (N.D. Cal.