Case law

(PC) Sierra v. Montejo

District Court, E.D. California · Aug 30, 2021

Board (VCB); (7) Dr. … Crowe v. Oregon State Bar, 989 F.3d 15 714, 730 (9th Cir. 2021); Brown v. Cal.

Tremaine Carroll v. State of California, et al.

District Court, E.D. California · Jul 2, 2026

Defendants Brown, Villegas, Contreras 4 The SAC alleges that, on or around January 2, 2023, Defendants Brown, Villegas, and 5 Contreras “attempted to intimidate” Plaintiff and other victims … See Will v. Mich. 6 Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 66 (1989); Brown v. Cal.

Benno v. Bosenko

District Court, E.D. California · Nov 30, 2020

Comm’rs v. Brown 17 (Brown), 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997) (a municipality may not be held vicariously liable for the acts 18 of its employees). … Trevino v.

Central Valley Eden Environmental Defenders, LLC v. Sweetener Products, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 5, 2026

Johnson v. … Aston. 8 See Gnathonic, LLC v. Dingman, 2019 WL 13166751, at *3 (C.D. Cal.

Chico Feminist Women's Health Center v. Butte Glenn Medical Society

557 F. Supp. 1190 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 23, 1983

See United Mine Workers, 86 S.Ct. at 1138 ; Deerfield Hutterian Association v. Ipswich Board of Education, 468 F.Supp. 1219, 1232 (D.S.D.1979). Questions of procedure, however, are governed by federal law. See Hanna v. … Friendship Medical Center Ltd. v. Chicago Board of Health, 505 F.2d 1141, 1145 (7th Cir.1974), ce rt. denied, 420 U.S. 997 , 95 S.Ct. 1438 , 43 L.Ed.2d 680 (1975).

Hamm v. American Home Products Corp.

888 F. Supp. 1037 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 28, 1995

See, e.g., Simpson v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Advantage Engineering Inc., 732 F.Supp. 1163, 1171 (N.D.Ga.1990).

(HC) Williams v. Lynch

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 15, 2021

See 17 Coleman v. Schwarzenegger, 922 F.Supp.2d 882, 986 (E.D. Cal. 2009); Plata v. Newsom, No. 18 4:01-cv-1351 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2020); Coleman v. Brown, 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-DB, ECF No. 19 5060 (E.D. Cal.). … Wilson v.

United States v. State of California

District Court, E.D. California · Mar 12, 2020

Governor Brown made the four linkage findings in 20 April 2013. (Id. ¶ 33.) … Steel Corp. v.

(PC) Keel v. Pine

District Court, E.D. California · Dec 3, 2021

See Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 21 942-43 (9th Cir. 2005). … The Government Claims Board notified him at least twice that his 15 claim was incomplete because the Board did not receive his filing fee.

Alexander v. Schleder

790 F. Supp. 2d 1179 · District Court, E.D. California · May 12, 2011

Brown v. Rison, 895 F.2d 533, 535 (9th Cir.1990). In the instant matter, the record indicates that Petitioner has exhausted his administrative remedies as to both Incident Report Nos. 1658527 and 1660209. III. … But see Howard v.

Board of Trustees of the Kern County Workers' Electrical Pension Fund v. Atkins Specialty Services, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 28, 2021

of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Pension 19 Fund, Board of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Workers Health & Welfare Trust, and 20 Board of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Journeyman & Apprenticeship … Reno-Tahoe Specialty, Inc. v. Mungchi, Inc., 468 F. Supp. 3d 1236, 1240 (C.D. 15 Cal. 2020) (citing Wollersheim v. Church of Scientology, 69 Cal. App. 4th 1012, 1018 (1999)). 16 B.

Board of Trustees of the Kern County Workers' Electrical Pension Fund v. Atkins Specialty Services, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California · Mar 2, 2021

INTRODUCTION 21 On June 10, 2020, Plaintiffs Board of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Pension Fund, 22 Board of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Workers Health & Welfare Trust … Wolf Metals Inc. v. Rand Pacific Sales, Inc., 4 4 Cal.

Barker v. Pick N Pull Auto Dismantlers, Inc.

819 F. Supp. 889 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 22, 1993

See Franchise Tax Board of California v. … District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Board of Trade, - U.S. -, -, 113 S.Ct. 580, 585 , 121 L.Ed.2d 513 (1992).

(PC) Palomar v. Newsom

District Court, E.D. California · Mar 27, 2025

See Jackson v. … See Ivey v. Bd.

T H Agriculture & Nutrition Co. v. Aceto Chemical Co.

884 F. Supp. 357 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 12, 1995

Browning-Ferris Indus., 33 F.3d 96, 101 (1st Cir.1994) (“[B]earing in mind that appellants are by their own admission liable parties, their claim against Browning must be classified as an action for contribution), cer t. … V.

(PC) Anderson v. Vangerwen

District Court, E.D. California · Dec 23, 2022

See 10 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 11 II. … See Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 27 268 (9th Cir. 1982).

(PC) McKenna v. Cisneros

District Court, E.D. California · Apr 11, 2023

See Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 4 In addition, plaintiff is informed that the court cannot refer to a prior pleading in order to 5 make plaintiff’s amended complaint complete. … Martinez v.

Fogel v. Grass Valley Police Department

415 F. Supp. 2d 1084 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 14, 2006

W.O.M.D. on Board!” (Defs.’ Statement of Undisputed Facts (“SUF”) ¶2.) The lettering was large and evidently intended to catch public attention. … with “W.O.M.D. on Board” was a “true threat.”

California Foundation for Independent Living Centers v. County of Sacramento

142 F. Supp. 3d 1035 · District Court, E.D. California · Nov 4, 2015

(the Access Board). 5 Id. ¶¶ 5-8. … Ten of the nineteen gate counters have a boarding gate reader and a podium attached to the side. UMF1 no. 15. The other nine have a boarding gate reader away from the counter and closer to the gate.

United States v. State of Cal.

639 F. Supp. 199 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 1, 1986

California notes that such delays were permitted in a somewhat different context in Midway Airline v. County of Westchester, 584 F.Supp. 436 (S.D.N.Y.1984) and British Airways Board v. … The United States relies on United States v. Composite Board of Examiners, 656 F.2d 131 (5th Cir.1981) and argues that Younger abstention is never applicable when the United States seeks to assert a federal interest.