Case law

CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board

75 F.3d 696 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 16, 1996

Cf Argento v. … Kungys v.

Northeast Master Executive Council v. Civil Aeronautics Board

506 F.2d 97 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 19, 1974

Peter Carey, et al. v. J. J. … Outland v.

LCF, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

129 F.3d 1276 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 25, 1997

See, e.g., Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 (1951); Schaeff Inc. v. NLRB, 113 F.3d 264, 266 (D.C. Cir. 1997); Gold Coast Restaurant Corp. v. NLRB, 995 F.2d 257, 263 (D.C. … v. NLRB, 56 F.3d 224, 228-29 (D.C. Cir. 1995).

James Banyard v. National Labor Relations Board, McLean Trucking Company, Intervenor. Clay D. Ferguson v. National Labor Relations Board

505 F.2d 342 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 14, 1974

If it were not present, the Board’s abstention might constitute [ ] not deference, *346 but abdication.” 19 Moreover, shortly thereafter in Local Union 715 v. … Associated Press v. NLRB, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 396, 401 , 492 F.2d 662 , 667 (1974). . Ibid. . Local Union 2188, AFL-CIO v. NLRB, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 168, 172 , 494 F.2d 1087, 1091 (1974). . Local Union 715, AFL-CIO v.

Lake Central Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

239 F.2d 46 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 8, 1956

Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 241 , 234 F.2d 62 , 64. … See American Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 343 , 179 F.2d 437 ; Sanders Bros. Radio Station v. Federal Communications Commission, 70 App.D.C. 297 , 106 F.2d 321 .

National Ass'n of Manufacturers v. National Labor Relations Board

717 F.3d 947 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 2013

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON, with whom Circuit Judge BROWN joins. … Chamber of Commerce of the U.S. v. Brown, 554 U.S. 60, 67 , 128 S.Ct. 2408 , 171 L.Ed.2d 264 (2008).

B. Willis, C.P.A., Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board

51 F. App'x 321 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 26, 2002

The Board argues that § 10501(a) is the only provision granting the Board jurisdiction, and that § 10501(b) does not expand the Board’s jurisdiction, but only renders the jurisdiction granted in § 10501(a) exclusive. … This interpretation is implausible on its face, and the Board, in determining that it has no jurisdiction over private tracks, has rejected it. See Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. FERC, 28 F.3d 1281 , 1284 (D.C.Cir.1994).

Hawaiian Dredging Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

857 F.3d 877 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 26, 2017

The Board reversed, with one member dissenting. A majority of the Board found the discharges were unlawful under both Wright Line, 251 NLRB 1083 (1980), and NLRB v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc., 388 U.S. 26 (1967). … facts of the case,” Pirlott v.

Tribune Publishing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

564 F.3d 1330 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 28, 2009

Discussion “We enforce a Board order if the factual findings upon which it rests are supported by ‘substantial evidence,’ see United States Testing Co. v. NLRB, 160 F.3d 14, 19 (D.C. … Cir. 1998), and the Board’s interpretation of the Act is reasonable and consistent with applicable precedent, see Local 702, Int’l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, AFL-CIO v. NLRB, 215 F.3d 11, 15 (D.C. Cir. 2000).”

Edwin Lamb Hooper v. National Transportation Safety Board

841 F.2d 1150 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 18, 1988

See Green Country Mobilephone, Inc. v. … FCC, 765 F.2d 235, 237-39 (D.C.Cir.1985) (failure to grant waiver for late filings arbitrary and capricious where it is indistinguishable from a case granting a waiver); see also Reuters Ltd. v.

Local No. 152 v. National Labor Relations Board

343 F.2d 307 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 28, 1965

We accordingly will set aside that part of the order of the Board which dismissed the complaint as to Baker and remand this phase of the ease to the Board for its further consideration. See NLRB v. … See also Scobell Chemical Co. v.

Haralson v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

837 F.2d 1123 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 22, 1988

Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, supra, at 477, 98 S.Ct. at 2462 . II. … [in] the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, for an order requiring the Board to remove such conservator ..., and the court shall upon the merits dismiss such action or direct the Board to remove such

Pacific Coast Supply, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

801 F.3d 321 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 18, 2015

Pharmacy v. … See Wagon Wheel Bowl, Inc. v.

W.C. McQuaide, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

133 F.3d 47 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 16, 1998

Therefore, we summarily enforce the Board’s order with respect to these charges. See Grondorf, Field, Black & Co. v. NLRB, 107 F.3d 882, 885 (D.C.Cir.1997); Intl. Union of Petroleum & Indus. Workers v. … See Taylor v. FDIC, 132 F.3d 753, 766 (D.C.Cir.1997) (quoting Katradis v. Dav-El of Wash., 846 F.2d 1482, 1485 (D.C.Cir.1988)).

Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

674 F.2d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 26, 1982

United States v. W. T. Grant Co., 345 U.S. 629, 632 , 73 S.Ct. 894, 897 , 97 L.Ed. 1303 (1953). See also Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Department of Energy, 627 F.2d 289 (D.C.Cir.1980). … In New Haven v. CAB, 618 F.2d 955 (2d Cir. 1980), Frontier Airlines v. CAB, 621 F.2d 369 (10th Cir. 1980), and Kern v.

Daycon Products Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

494 F. App'x 97 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 2012

It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied and the Board’s cross-application for enforcement be granted. … We hold that the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence in the record. Daycon also raises procedural challenges to the Board’s denial of certain motions.

Garvey Marine, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

245 F.3d 819 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 2001

Co. v. NLRB, 140 F.3d 259, 265 (D.C.Cir.1998). The Board’s determination finds such support. … Plastics, Inc. v. NLRB, 209 F.3d 727, 738 (D.C.Cir.2000), we scrutinize with great care the Board’s decision to issue one. The Board must show that the employer’s ULPs were “serious,” Skyline Distrib. v.

Local 702, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

215 F.3d 11 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 9, 2000

American Ship Building Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra; National Labor Relations Board v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965); and National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Brown, supra, 380 U.S. at 289 , 85 S.Ct. at 987 ; American Ship Building Co. v.

Hopkins v. Women's Division, General Board of Global Ministries

98 F. App'x 8 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 27, 2004

See Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Stewart v. Ashcroft, 352 F.3d 422, 426 (D.C.Cir.2003). Hopkins’s third claim is legally insufficient for a separate reason.

Nancy Johnson v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

969 F.2d 1082 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 11, 1992

Compare Linquist v. … See, e.g., Crandon v.