Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscadc

10,000+ results

1.64s

  • Edwin Lamb Hooper v. National Transportation Safety Board

    841 F.2d 1150 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 18, 1988

    See Green Country Mobilephone, Inc. v. … FCC, 765 F.2d 235, 237-39 (D.C.Cir.1985) (failure to grant waiver for late filings arbitrary and capricious where it is indistinguishable from a case granting a waiver); see also Reuters Ltd. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Brown Telecasters, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Television Broadcasters, Inc., Intervenor

    289 F.2d 868 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 1961

    Federal Communications Commission v. Sanders Bros. Radio Station, 309 U.S. 470, 477 [642, 60 S.Ct. 693 , [698] 84 L. Ed. 869, 1037 ].” Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. … Market Street Ry. v. [Railroad] Comm’n, 324 U.S. 548 , 561— 2 [ 65 S.Ct. 770 , 89 L.Ed. 1171 ] (1945).” . 47 U.S.C.A. § 402 (b) (1).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen v. Surface Transportation Board

    638 F.3d 807 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 29, 2011

    “We review the [Board’s] interpretation of section 10901, a statute it is charged with enforcing, under the principles set forth in Chevron USA Inc. v. … In any event, that the Board has repeatedly interpreted the statute the same way for 20 years does indeed warrant deference. See Barnhart v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Railroad Yardmasters of America v. Robert O. Harris, Chairman, National Mediation Board

    721 F.2d 1332 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 16, 1983

    Brown. 8 Later that day Member Brown resigned, leaving Member Harris as the only remaining member. … The YSC did not file an application with the Board until June 10, 1982, nine days after Chairman Brown’s retirement.” Railroad Yardmasters v. Harris, slip op. at 8, reprinted in J.A. 23.

    Cited 81 timesPublished
  • Mathew Enterprise, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    498 F. App'x 45 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 14, 2012

    Rather, “[t]he substantial evidence standard is not modified in any way when the Board and its examiner disagree.” Universal Camera Corp. v. … Greater Boston Television Corp. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pacific Coast Supply, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

    801 F.3d 321 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 18, 2015

    Pharmacy v. … See Wagon Wheel Bowl, Inc. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Haralson v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

    837 F.2d 1123 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 22, 1988

    Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, supra, at 477, 98 S.Ct. at 2462 . II. … [in] the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, for an order requiring the Board to remove such conservator ..., and the court shall upon the merits dismiss such action or direct the Board to remove such

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Irontiger Logistics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    823 F.3d 696 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 20, 2016

    . & Presbyterian Hosp. v. NLRB, 649 F.3d 723, 730 (D.C. … See Crowley Marine Servs., Inc. v. NLRB, 234 F.3d 1295, 1297 (D.C. Cir. 2000). (We understand that the Board’s burden- shifting rule does not saddle the employer with a heavy burden.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. National Laundry Co.

    138 F.2d 589 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 1, 1943

    Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 197, 226 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 215 , 83 L.Ed. 126 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Oregon Worsted Co., 9 Cir., 96 F.2d 193 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Biles-Coleman Lumber Co., 9 Cir., 96 F.2d 197 . National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Garvey Marine, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    245 F.3d 819 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 2001

    Co. v. NLRB, 140 F.3d 259, 265 (D.C.Cir.1998). The Board’s determination finds such support. … Plastics, Inc. v. NLRB, 209 F.3d 727, 738 (D.C.Cir.2000), we scrutinize with great care the Board’s decision to issue one. The Board must show that the employer’s ULPs were “serious,” Skyline Distrib. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Betty Haufrecht v. Subversive Activities Control Board

    322 F.2d 403 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 6, 1963

    This is one of the cases to which we referred in Labor Youth League v. … See Walling v. James V. Reuter Co., 321 U.S. 671 , 64 S.Ct 826 , 88 L.Ed. 1001 (1944).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Chelsea Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    285 F.3d 1073 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 12, 2002

    We defer to the Board's interpretation of the Act if it is reasonable, see Holly Farms Corp. v. … support during the certification year, see Brooks v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • British Caledonian Airways, Ltd. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    584 F.2d 982 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 15, 1978

    American President Lines v. … In Nader v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Transport Workers Union v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    725 F.2d 775 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 20, 1984

    Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. CAB, 683 F.2d 554, 559 (D.C.Cir.1982); Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. … See, e.g., Switchmen’s Union v. NMB, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943); Air Line Pilots Ass’n, Int’l v. Texas Int’l Airlines, 656 F.2d 16 (2d Cir.1981); Adams v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Northeast Master Executive Council v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    506 F.2d 97 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 19, 1974

    Peter Carey, et al. v. J. J. … Outland v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • New York & Presbyterian Hospital v. National Labor Relations Board

    649 F.3d 723 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 2011

    Before: HENDERSON , BROWN and KAVANAUGH , Circuit Judges. 2 Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON . … . & Presbyterian Hosp. v. NLRB, No. 09-1200 (D.C. Cir. July 16, 2009). After the United States Supreme Court held that three Board members are required to constitute a Board quorum in New Process Steel, L.P. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • British Overseas Airways Corp. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    304 F.2d 952 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 1962

    See Chicago & Southern Air Lines v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 333 U.S. 103 , 68 S.Ct. 431 , 92 L. Ed. 668 , interpreting the identical provision of the Civil Aeronautics Act, § 1006(a), formerly 49 U.S.C.A. § 646 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • LCF, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    129 F.3d 1276 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 25, 1997

    See, e.g., Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 (1951); Schaeff Inc. v. NLRB, 113 F.3d 264, 266 (D.C. Cir. 1997); Gold Coast Restaurant Corp. v. NLRB, 995 F.2d 257, 263 (D.C. … v. NLRB, 56 F.3d 224, 228-29 (D.C. Cir. 1995).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Richardson v. Browning

    18 F.2d 1008 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 4, 1927

    Thereafter, on March 25, 1924, and pursuant to said petition, the said Evelyn Browning was adjudged destitute and committed to said board by the said court, she being at that time 15 years of age. … Goldsmith v. Valentine, 36 App. D. C. 63; Posey v. Zinkham, 47 App. D. C. 293.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.