Case law

Arthur M. Schiller v. National Labor Relations Board

964 F.2d 1205 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 29, 1992

To justify its decision to withhold the documents, the Board submitted a Vaughn index to the court. See Vaughn v. Rosen, 484 F.2d 820 (D.C.Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 977 , 94 S.Ct. 1564 , 39 L.Ed.2d 873 (1974). … The Board later amended its Vaughn index and also submitted the affidavit of John H. Higgins, Jr., the Board’s Deputy General Counsel, explaining the Board’s response to Mr.

CF Industries, Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board

255 F.3d 816 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 27, 2001

Western Coal Traffic League v. … Consolidated Rail Corp. v.

Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

277 F.2d 334 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 11, 1960

Braniff says no substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that public convenience and necessity required amendment of the certificate. We think there was ample evidence. … But in Civil Aeronautics Board v.

Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. National Mediation Board

29 F.3d 655 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 19, 1994

Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 302 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1718 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). … Inc. v.

National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1622 v. Brown

645 F.2d 1017 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 18, 1981

National Fed’n of Federal Employees v. Brown, 481 F.Supp. 704 (D.D.C.1979); American Fed’n of Gov’t Employees v. Brown, 481 F.Supp. 711 (D.D.C.1979). . 5 U.S.C. §§ 5341-5349 (1976 & Supp. III 1979). … See Myers v.

National Air Carrier Ass'n v. Civil Aeronautics Board

436 F.2d 185 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 28, 1970

See Fugazy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. CAB, 121 U.S.App.D.C. 355 , 350 F.2d 733 (1965); Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. … See Bebchick v.

Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

169 F.2d 893 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 2, 1948

Neild v. District of Columbia, 1940, 71 App.D.C. 306 , 314 et seq., 110 F.2d 246 , 254 et seq., particularly the authorities cited in notes 35-39. United States v. New York Cent. R. … Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co., 1944, 320 U.S. 591 , 64 S.Ct. 281 , 88 L.Ed. 333 . Continental A. L., Mail Rates— Routes Nos. 29 and 43, 2 C.A.B. 683 (1941); Continental A.

Highlands Hospital Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

508 F.3d 28 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 30, 2007

But in Allentown Mack Sales & Service, Inc. v. … Postal Workers Union v. NLRB, 370 F.3d 25, 28 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (quoting Alwin Mfg. Co. v. NLRB, 192 F.3d 133, 143 (D.C. Cir. 1999)).

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

473 F.2d 91 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 24, 1972

Bannercraft Clothing Co., Inc. v. The Renegotiation Board, 151 U. S.App.D.C. 174, 466 F.2d 345 (decided July 6, 1972). … While Myers v.

Spurlino Materials, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

805 F.3d 1131 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 13, 2015

Like the Board, we find that the partial-strike precedents are a poor fit for the case before us. See Pacific Coast Supply, LLC v. NLRB, 801 F.3d 321, 333 (D.C. … See Vencare Ancillary Servs., Inc. v.

Boeing Airplane Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

174 F.2d 988 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 31, 1949

The Board has found that the no-strike clause of the 1946 contract was not breached. … See National Labor Relations Board v. Sands Manufacturing Co., 306 U.S. 332, 344 , 59 S.Ct. 508 , 83 L.Ed. 682 .

Dover Energy, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

818 F.3d 725 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 22, 2016

Synergy Gas Corp. v. NLRB, 19 F.3d 649, 651 (D.C. Cir. 1994). … Id. at 930–31 (emphases added) (quoting Tasty Baking Co. v. NLRB, 254 F.3d 114, 124 (D.C. Cir. 2001)); accord DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. NLRB, 288 F.3d 434, 444 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Deutsche Lufthansa Aktienge-Sellschaft v. Civil Aeronautics Board

479 F.2d 912 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 18, 1973

National Airlines, Inc. v. … See, e. g., Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 257 F.2d 229 (1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 881 , 79 S.Ct. 120 , 3 L.Ed.2d 111 (1958); C.A.B. v.

Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc. v. Babbitt

87 F.3d 1338 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 2, 1996

WALD, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc. … Id. at 36 (citing Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 , [302] n. 31, 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979)) (emphasis added).

Petrochem Insulation, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

240 F.3d 26 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 26, 2001

The Board rejected this argument, relying on DeBartolo Corp. v. Fla. Gulf Coast Bldg. & Constr. … --the Board relied on Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v.

Tenneco Automotive, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

716 F.3d 640 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 28, 2013

Wayneview Care Ctr. v. NLRB, 664 F.3d 341, 348 (D.C. Cir. 2011). We owe “substantial deference” to inferences drawn by the Board from the factual record. Halle Enters., Inc. v. NLRB, 247 F.3d 268, 271 (D.C. Cir. 2001). … McQuaide, Inc. v. NLRB, 133 F.3d 47, 49 (D.C.

Tradesmen International, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

275 F.3d 1137 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 15, 2002

Associa- tion of Civilian Technicians v. FLRA, 269 F.3d 1112, 1117 (D.C. Cir. 2001); see also, Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. … The Board also relied on the Ninth Circuit's decision in Kaiser Engineers v.

Anderson Enterprises v. National Labor Relations Board

2 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 9, 2001

. § 160 (e) (West 2000); Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). … See NLRB v. J.H. Rutter-Rex Mfg. Co., 396 U.S. 258, 264-65 , 90 S.Ct. 417 , 24 L.Ed.2d 405 (1969); NLRB v. Electric Vacuum Cleaner Co., 315 U.S. 685, 698 , 62 S.Ct. 846 , 86 L.Ed. 1120 (1942); Bufco Corp. v.

Labor Youth League v. Subversive Activities Control Board

322 F.2d 364 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 25, 1963

Some of these cases are discussed in Mills v. Green 9 and in Walling v. James V. … And also see United States v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Co., 239 U.S. 466, 476-478 , 36 S.Ct. 212 ,. 60 L.Ed. 387 (1916); Defense Supplies Corp. v.

Town of Springfield v. Surface Transportation Board

412 F.3d 187 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 2005

ICC v. Bhd. of Locomotive Eng’rs, 482 U.S. 270, 280 (1987). … The Board’s refusal to reopen for that reason is therefore not subject to judicial review. See Entravision Holdings, LLC v. FCC, 202 F.3d 311, 313 (D.C. Cir. 2000); see also Schoenbohm v. FCC, 204 F.3d 243, 250 (D.C.