Case law

Lepelletier v. Federal Deposit Insurance

164 F.3d 37 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 5, 1999

Corp., 429 U.S. 252 (1977), "the individual plaintiff's injury was the denial of an opportunity to obtain housing for which he would otherwise be qualified. … It has also found that "[i]ncorporat- ed in the 'clearly unwarranted' language is the requirement for ...

Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power Commission

156 F.2d 821 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 1946

But two things are certain: (1) The statute clearly contemplates that the Commission may require the licensee to establish and maintain accounts; (2) the licensee must allow the Commission to have access to all accounts which … and maintain accounts such as that Department requires, and to control such accounts so established.

Leedom v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 108

278 F.2d 237 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 24, 1960

It is undisputed that General Cable is a part of an industry which qualified for a three-year bar. … To establish an in futuro rule for all pending cases would create an administrative monstrosity.

Atlantic Richfield Co. v. United States

774 F.2d 1193 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 11, 1985

As such, the MarAd approvals are clearly licenses. See Blackwell College of Business v. … Atty.Gen. 302, 309-11 (1930), and hence MarAd did not err in considering these vessels as qualifying for the domestic trade "pursuant to section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act.” 46 C.F.R. § 240.2 (c) (1984).

Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Browner

57 F.3d 1121 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 27, 1995

The petition is supported by detailed invoices, underlying office records, and the declaration of qualified counsel. … Hence, although Congress clearly established mandatory sanctions to increase the pressure on recalcitrant states and EPA, the additional delay allowed by EPA’s interpretation, as compared with that urged by NRDC, is not incompatible

Cleveland County Ass'n v. Cleveland County Board of Commissioners

142 F.3d 468 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 1, 1998

What is important is whether the CCAGP10 has succeeded in establishing the __________ the black community." … Our resolution of the standing dispute obviates a rehearsal of the first point: the CCAGP and the individual plaintiffs clearly have asserted that the consent decree has inflicted an injury to their legal rights.

Hennepin County v. Sullivan

883 F.2d 85 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1989

at oral argument, counsel for HCMC acknowledged that this regulation was in place and lawful, and that it had been consistently applied by the agency to claims of the sort at issue here. *20 It is clear that HCMC did not qualify … The record clearly supports the PRRB denial of such an exception to HCMC.

Bobby L. Champion v. S&m Traylor Brothers and Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company

690 F.2d 285 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 8, 1982

Katz, who clearly recognized Champion’s emotional symptoms, specifically disclaimed any qualification to address them. Finally, both he and Dr. … Prednisone is a synthetic derivative of cortisone used primarily for its anti-inflammatory effects and its modification of immune responses. Physician’s Desk Reference 1521 (35th ed. 1982).

Coalition for the Preservation of Hispanic Broadcasting v. Federal Communications Commission, Univision Holdings, Inc., Intervenors

893 F.2d 1349 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 27, 1990

Established on the premise that “a licensee ... has nothing to assign or transfer unless and until he has established his own qualifications,” Northland Television, Inc., 42 Rad. … Moreover, if on remand the Commission chooses to modify this policy, it must articulate clearly the content and scope of the new policy.

Federal Election Commission v. International Funding Institute, Inc.

969 F.2d 1110 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 5, 1992

Horner, 879 F.2d 873, 878 (D.C.Cir.1989) (“business people will not overlook an opportunity to get cheaply from the Government what otherwise comes dearly, a list of qualified prospects”). … Clearly, however, § 438(a)(4) does not create a “property interest in the political sympathies of another.”

United States v. Anderson

39 F.3d 331 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 18, 1994

Specifically, the appellants argue that the trial evidence at most established multiple conspiracies rather than the single conspiracy charged in the indictment. … is not included in establishing the defendant’s offense level under this guideline.

Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corporation v. Coe

102 F.2d 236 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 29, 1938

Commercial success to an extraordinary extent was established in the instant case; indeed, was conceded by the Commissioner. … to be clearly wrong.

Food Lion, Incorporated v. United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio-Clc, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc

103 F.3d 1007 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 10, 1997

In the contempt order, the district court stated': The Kamber Group is clearly in contempt. … The district court’s order clearly directed Kamber to search all of its records. A0024.

Rogers v. Ercona Camera Corporation

277 F.2d 94 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 17, 1960

But here at the time of seizure it was not possible to establish a business in which the mark could be used and none was established. 8 Upon termination of the first World War, it is possible that the Custodian or his successor … Although the seizure provisions were clearly designed to permit the United States to take title to and possession of all property in this country which was owned by enemy aliens, 10 it does not follow that Congress intended

California Association of the Physically Handicapped, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Fox Television Stations, Inc., Ktla, Inc., National Broadcasting Co., Inc., Rko General, Inc., Community Television of Southern California, Kcop Television, Inc., Cbs, Inc., Metromedia, Inc., Intervenors. California Association of the Physically Handicapped, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Tribune Broadcasting Company, Intervenor

840 F.2d 88 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 4, 1988

Appellants do not allege that any of the licensees have discriminated against the handicapped in employment, only that the licensees have failed to establish EEO programs covering them. … See 76 F.C.C.2d at 99 ("an established violation of law clearly raises a question as to an applicant's qualifications to be a broadcast licensee"); 69 F.C.C.2d at 458-59 ("in the event some adverse finding were to be made

John R. Thompson Co., Inc. v. District of Columbia. District of Columbia v. John R. Thompson Co., Inc

203 F.2d 579 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 6, 1953

The right to forfeit this property by the revocation of the license must clearly appear, or it must be held not to exist. … In such latter event we ought to say just that; we ought not in effect to qualify our conclusion. I am authorized to state that Circuit Judge WILBUR K.

Hardaway v. District of Columbia Housing Authority

843 F.3d 973 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 16, 2016

Cir. 2013) (holding that injury in fact was “clearly establish[ed]” where a veteran challenged a Veterans Administration policy denying him a benefit to which he claimed an entitlement). … Neither did it indicate that Lena Hardaway qualified as a family member under 24 C.F.R. § 982.551(h)(2).

National Organization for Women v. Social Security Administration of the Department of Health & Human Services

736 F.2d 727 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 25, 1984

Indubitably, the proceedings culminating in the administrative decisions to release company-submitted data were adjudicatory in character. 95 Confronting the agency were the questions whether any of the material was immunized … I speak, of course, of information shielded from mandatory disclosure by Exemption 6, not that so immunized by Exemption 4 and removed by the Trade Secrets Act from the area of discretionary release. .

Gorman, David J. v. AmeriTrade Hold Corp

293 F.3d 506 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 2002

The "mere accessibility of the defendants' websites," we held, does not "establish[ ] the necessary 'minimum contacts' with this forum." … IV Ameritrade is quite wrong in treating "cyberspace" as if it were a kingdom floating in the mysterious ether, immune from the jurisdiction of earthly courts.

Hikvision USA, Inc. v. FCC

97 F.4th 938 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 2, 2024

Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Announces Publication of the List of Equipment and Services Covered by Section 2 of the Secure 2 The other qualifying determinations include: (i) “A specific determination … Congress has clearly expressed its view that Petitioners’ products pose a risk to national security in certain circumstances.