Case law

Kenneth I. Brown v. Herman Miller, Inc.

890 F.2d 443 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 17, 1989

Brown v. Herman Miller, Inc., supra note 1, at 5-7. 7 . Id. at 6. 8 . … Brown v. Herman Miller, Inc., supra note 1, at 5. 12 . See id. at 4-9. 13 . The jurisdiction of the District Court rested exclusively upon a diversity of citizenship between Brown and Miller. See Complaint ¶ 1, Brown v.

Shay v. United States. Brown v. United States

212 F.2d 809 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1954

212 F.2d 809 93 U.S.App.D.C. 379 SHAY, v. UNITED STATES. BROWN v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 11809, 11846. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Nov. 20, 1953. Decided Feb. 19, 1954. … PER CURIAM. 1 Of the several contentions raised on these appeals, the only one that would otherwise require discussion relates to the form and execution of search warrants and is answered by Ledbetter v.

Doe v. Board on Professional Responsibility

717 F.2d 1424 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 16, 1983

See Leis v. Flynt, 439 U.S. 438, 442 , 99 S.Ct. 698, 700 , 58 L.Ed.2d 717 (1979); Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Ass’n, 436 U.S. 447, 460 , 98 S.Ct. 1912, 1920 , 56 L.Ed.2d 444 (1978). … No. 91-358, 84 Stat. 521, 11 D.C.Code §§ 2501-2503; see District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 1303 , 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Simons v.

Summerfield, Postmaster General v. Civil Aeronautics Board. Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

207 F.2d 200 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 12, 1953

As such it was “income” within the meaning which that term has had ever since Doyle v. Mitchell Bros. Co. 7 But our problem is whether it was “revenue” within the meaning of this rate-making statute. … Transcontinental & Western Air v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 1949, 336 U.S. 601 , 69 S.Ct. 756 , 93 L.Ed. 911 . . West Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities Comm. (No. 2), 1935, 294 U.S. 79, 82 , 55 S.Ct. 324 , 79 L.Ed. 773 .

Jacquelyne L. Neal v. William H. Brown, III

980 F.2d 747 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 11, 1992

Alton Box Board Co., 609 F.2d 112 , 113 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 1090 , 63 L.Ed.2d 327 (1980); Aberle Hosiery Co. v. American Arbitration Ass’n, 461 F.2d 1005, 1006 (3d Cir.1972); Brough v. … See Rodriguez v. Handy, 802 F.2d 817, 821 (5th Cir.1986); Robert Stigwood Group Ltd. v. Hurwitz, 462 F.2d 910 , 914 & n. 7 (2d Cir.1972); cf. E.P. Hinkel & Co. v.

Kemp v. Board of Medical Supervisors

46 App. D.C. 173 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 1917

Widrig v. Oyer, 13 Johns. 124 ; Filber v. Dauterman, 26 Wis. 518 ; Bissell v. Cornell, 24 Wend. 354 . … In Halstead v.

DirecTV, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

837 F.3d 25 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 16, 2016

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. SRINIVASAN, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Act protects employees’ right to engage in concerted activities. … Morissette v.

Brown v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Co

495 F.2d 1074 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 14, 1974

495 F.2d 1074 162 U.S.App.D.C. 18 Brown v.

Cohen v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

167 F.2d 883 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 21, 1948

But the Unemployment Compensation' Board ruled that Cohen’s became a new employer, required to pay contributions at a new rate, and the District Court sustained the Board. … Karlson v. Murphy, 387 Ill. 436 , 56 N.E.2d 839 ; Meyer v. Michigan Unemployment Compensation Commission, 311 Mich. 440 , 18 N.W.2d 886 , 159 A.L.R. 1195 ; Finston v.

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Surface Transportation Board

571 F.3d 13 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 2009

Corp. v. … Co. v. STB, 453 F.3d 473, 478-79 (D.C.

Bernard Bell v. Harold Brown, Secretary, Department of Defense

557 F.2d 849 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 20, 1977

In Coles v. Penny, 33 a federal employee was advised by the Board that administrative review of his discrimination complaint was complete but was not told that he had a right to sue within 30 days. … Cass withdrew prior to announcement of the Board’s decision. See text supra at notes 16-20 and notes 17, 19 supra; compare Vindigni v. Meyer, 441 F.2d 376 (2d Cir. 1971). We are mindful that Mr. Cass and Mr.

Burinskas v. National Labor Relations Board

357 F.2d 822 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 1, 1966

Burinskas v. National Labor Relations Board, No. 18,054, order dated January 8, 1964, hereinafter referred to. … The Board then decided Kohler v. N. L. R. B., 148 NLRB 1434 (1964). The Board’s initial decision had been that certain strikers need not be rehired.

Nyunt v. Chairman, Broadcasting Board of Governors

589 F.3d 445 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 18, 2009

Government agencies, the Broadcasting Board of Governors is authorized to hire non-U.S.-citizens. … See Tiltti v. Weise, 155 F.3d 596, 600 (2d Cir. 1998); Pinar v. Dole, 747 F.2d 899, 912-13 (4th Cir. 1984); Broadway v.

Randy v. Cargill v. John O. Marsh, Jr.

902 F.2d 1006 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 18, 1990

Id. at 1511 (quoting Gilligan v. Morgan, 413 U.S. 1, 10 , 93 S.Ct. 2440, 2446 , 37 L.Ed.2d 407 (1973)). … , rather than by proceeding before the Correction Board, is inconsistent with the heightened deference Congress intended the courts to accord determinations of the Correction Board in proceedings under 10 U.S.C. § 1552 (a

Charles Luck v. D.C. Parole Board

996 F.2d 372 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 25, 1993

Luck v. Chairman, D.C. Parole Board, No. 90-0775, mem. op., 1990 WL 179928 (D.D.C. Oct. 30, 1990). … Williamson v.

Gesellschaft Fur Drahtlose Telegraphie M. B. H. v. Brown

78 F.2d 410 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 13, 1935

Alfred Frankenthaler and John Wilson Brown III. … Wylie v. Coxe, 15 How. 415 [ 14 L. Ed. 753 ]; Wright v. Tebbitts, 91 U. S. 252 [ 23 L.

Schley Brown v. United States

239 F.2d 75 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 26, 1956

239 F.2d 75 Schley BROWN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 13268. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Argued November 20, 1956. Decided November 29, 1956.

John J. White, Jr. v. William A. Brown

292 F.2d 725 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 18, 1961

See Dunbar v. Steiert, 1927, 31 Ariz. 403 , 253 P. 1113 ; International Harvester Co. of America v. Layton, 1921, 148 Ark. 156 , 229 S.W. 22 ; LeGault v. … Tuckerman v. Mearns, 49 App.D.C. 153 , 262 F. 607 . But we do not find the Tuckerman case or others cited by appellee, Wadhams v. Page, 1890, 1 Wash. 420 , 25 P. 482 and Michelin Tire Co. v.

Herbert L. Fenster v. Harold Brown, Secretary of Defense

617 F.2d 740 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 18, 1979

Cuneo v. Brown, No. 1826-67 (D.D.C. Aug. 7, 1978) (Order Denying Attorneys’ Fees). Appellant Fenster challenges that ruling as an abuse of discretion. II. … Cuneo v. Brown, No. 1826-67 (D.D.C. Aug. 7, 1978) (Order Denying Motion for Attorneys’ Fees). In making this decision, Judge Hart properly exercised the discretion permitted under section 552(a)(4)(E).

Brown v. U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington

53 F. App'x 118 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 6, 2002

In re Kaminski, 960 F.2d 1062, 1064 (D.C.Cir.1992) (per curiam) (quoting Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619 , 93 S. Ct. 1146 , 35 L.Ed.2d 536 (1973)); see also Sargeant v.