Opinion

Shay v. United States. Brown v. United States

  • 212 F.2d 809
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Jun 7, 1954
Status
Published
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 71.3%

The opinion

212 F.2d 809

93 U.S.App.D.C. 379

SHAY,

v.

UNITED STATES.

BROWN

v.

UNITED STATES.

Nos. 11809, 11846.

United States Court of Appeals,

District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Nov. 20, 1953.

Decided Feb. 19, 1954.

Writ of Certiorari Denied June 7, 1954.

See 74 S.Ct. 865 .

Messrs. Curtis P. Mitchell and DeLong Harris, Washington, D.C., for appellants.

Mr. Samuel J. L'Hommedieu, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U.S. Atty., Lewis A. Carroll, and John D. Lane, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee. Messrs. E. Riley Casey, Asst. U.S. Atty., and William R. Glendon, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., at time record was filed entered appearances in No. 11809. Mr. William J. Peck, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., at time record was filed, entered an appearance in No. 11809 and No. 11846.

Before EDGERTON, BAZELON, and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Of the several contentions raised on these appeals, the only one that would otherwise require discussion relates to the form and execution of search warrants and is answered by Ledbetter v. United States, 93 U.S.App.D.C. . . ., 211 F.2d 628 . As we held in that case, D.C. Code 1951 § 23-301 need not be complied with when Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (28 U.S.C.A.) is complied with.

2

Affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.