Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscadc

6,967 results

1.58s

  • International Harvester Co. v. Ruckelshaus

    478 F.2d 615 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 10, 1973

    The same NAS Report had stated : 34 the status of development and rate of progress made it possible that the larger manufacturers will be able to produce vehicles that will qualify, provided that provisions are made for catalyst … Requirement of Observed Data From Manufacturers Clearly this requires that the applicants come forward with data which showed that they could not comply with the contemplated standards.

    Cited 233 timesPublished
  • Secretary of Labor v. KC Transport, Inc.

    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 2026

    Reich, 510 U.S. 200, 215 (1994) (“[The Commission was] established exclusively to adjudicate Mine Act disputes.”). … Fantasy, Inc., 510 U.S. 517, 533 (1994) (“The word ‘may’ clearly connotes discretion.”). 129 Fed. R. App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Securitypoint Holdings, Inc. v. Transportation Security Administration

    836 F.3d 32 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 2, 2016

    The government bears the burden of establishing substantial justification. See Halverson v. Slater, 206 F.3d 1205, 1208 (D.C. Cir. 2000). … This indifference seems sufficiently beyond ordinary “arbitrary and capricious” agency action to qualify as lacking substantial justification.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • United States v. John C. Brizendine, Charles M. Forsyth, James S. McDonnell Iii, and Sherman Pruitt, Jr.

    659 F.2d 215 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 17, 1981

    United States, 217 U.S. 423, 430, 30 S.Ct. 539, 541 , 54 L.Ed. 821 (1910) (plea for statutory immunity). In addition to motions to dismiss based on speedy trial grounds, see United States v. … The language of Bordenkircher clearly implies that the notice requirement is limited to the situation in that case.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Florida Audubon Society v. Lloyd M. Bentsen, Secretary of the Treasury, and Margaret Richardson, Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service

    94 F.3d 658 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 20, 1996

    Although the court criticizes the City of Los Angeles test for not clearly requiring a showing of increased risk to “a particularized interest of the plaintiff, rather than the environment in general,” Maj. … In 1988, sixty-one United States senators 6 urged the Secretary to announce that ETBE qualifies for the tax credit, explaining that “[b]y establishing the eligibility of the credit, commercialization can occur immediately

    Cited 618 timesPublished
  • Elliott v. United States Department of Agriculture

    596 F.3d 842 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 26, 2010

    The district court nonetheless denied in part the government’s summary judgment motion on the grounds that the government had failed to establish the predominant internality of the blueprints or articulate clearly the connection … Determining whether the blueprints qualify as predominantly internal documents that relate to agency personnel rules and practices does not end our analysis.

    Cited 117 timesPublished
  • Furey v. Mnuchin

    334 F. Supp. 3d 148 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 24, 2018

    Plaintiff also points to Susarla's deposition testimony, in which he clearly could not remember how or why Graham provided any supplemental information to him. … Defendant concedes that a termination qualifies as an adverse action under Title VII and the ADEA. See Def.'s Mem. at 11.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Emmett J. Stebbins v. Keystone Insurance Company Emmett J. Stebbins v. Insurance Company of North America

    481 F.2d 501 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 5, 1973

    One June 30, 1970, the court issued a memorandum 6 delineating the facts established by INA that were not in dispute. … In Bland we considered the merits of a challenge by a reserve officer to the Navy’s action in giving him a qualified discharge.

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • Cobell, Elouise v. Kempthorne, Dirk

    455 F.3d 301 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 11, 2006

    We noted that the class members sought injunctive and declaratory relief; thus, the federal government’s sovereign immunity was waived under the APA. 240 F.3d at 1094-95. … The two bodies of law overlap in shaping our ability to grant relief once a specific breach of an established duty has been found.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Donald R. Ashton, Jr. v. Benjamin R. Civiletti, Attorney General of the United States of America, Department of Justice

    613 F.2d 923 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 4, 1980

    Secretary, 192 U.S.App.D.C. 243 , 591 F.2d 852 (1978), an Air Force regulation embodying a general policy of termination for homosexual acts contained a qualifying provision to the effect that exceptions could be made if … In sum, appellees made to appellant “a clearly implied promise of continued employment,” Board of Regents v.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Natl Treas Empl v. FLRA

    404 F.3d 454 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 15, 2005

    With respect to Sections 7106(a)(1) and 7106(b)(2), the Authority’s decision quite clearly was not arbitrary or capricious. … The Authority’s path to error was set when it erroneously found that “the agency has exercised its right to determine its internal security by having employees who are trained and qualified to carry firearms maintain possession

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Tracey A. Hall

    969 F.2d 1102 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 10, 1992

    The general contours of applicable Fourth Amendment law on consensual searches are well established. … On this record, we cannot say that the district court’s determination of voluntary consent was clearly erroneous. We therefore affirm its denial of appellant’s motion to suppress. B.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Atlas Brew Works, LLC v. Barr

    391 F. Supp. 3d 6 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 31, 2019

    Cir. 2015) ("[Leonard's] claims do not qualify for the capable-of-repetition, yet-evading-review exception to the mootness doctrine because the likelihood of a future government shutdown is too speculative." … Therefore, while Biggs may have remarked on the likelihood of another California budget impasse, it was clearly not doing so under the rubric that controls the Court's inquiry in this case.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., v. Federal Maritime Commission

    389 F.2d 962 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 18, 1968

    But clearly the Commission's orders are not contradictory. … Because of the terminal operators' disclaimer of liability in Truck Tariff No. 6, which immunizes the steamship companies and others operating piers at New York Harbor, the truckers' only recourse has been to try to collect

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Verizon v. FCC

    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 14, 2014

    According to the Commission, the change was driven by its decision to raise the minimum speed threshold qualifying as broadband. Id. at 9558 ¶ 4. … But section 201(a) describes a “duty” of a common carrier, not a prerequisite for qualifying as a common carrier in the first place.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General, and as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian v. Anni H. J. E. Oehmichen

    243 F.2d 637 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 29, 1957

    Oehmichen filed a letter, addressed to the Officer in Charge of the camp, advising him, 'Should a review of my case result in a decision qualifying me for a parole, you are advised that I would not accept same.' … Internment is the established international treatment of resident enemy aliens by all civilized countries. 3 The Oehmichens chose to return to an enemy country rather than to undergo that established treatment. 10 If the

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. W.J. Poston

    902 F.2d 90 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 4, 1990

    Given the trial judge’s broad discretion to grant or deny a continuance, an appellate court’s role is limited to determining whether the judge “clearly abused” his discretion. United States v. … There is considerable authority for the proposition that, regardless of any grant of immunity, a witness convicted for a given transaction loses the fifth amendment privilege and may be compelled to testify with respect to

    Cited 98 timesPublished
  • Carter ex rel. Middleton v. Cleland

    643 F.2d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 17, 1980

    Benefits were denied on the ground that the widows did not qualify as “surviving spouses” under 38 U.S.C. § 101 (3) (1976). 2 The Administrator reasoned that the births of children by other men indicated that appellants intended … See Decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals, Attachment A to Defendant’s Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed Dec. 22, 1978 (condonation not proven although spouse established

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Federal Election Commission

    380 F. Supp. 3d 30 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 29, 2019

    And New Models did not make "any independent expenditures of its own expressly advocating the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate." Id. … The statute clearly requires that for any official Commission decision there must be at least a 4-2 majority vote.").

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • American Meat Institute v. United States Department of Agriculture

    760 F.3d 18 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 29, 2014

    Reynolds majority’s repeated emphasis on Zauderer’s deception limitation, I do not see how it qualifies as even “arguably dictum.” … Additionally, the early years of free speech jurisprudence saw laws routinely upheld that by today’s standards clearly interfere with commercial speech.

    Cited 101 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.