Case law

Gulf Oil Corporation v. Walter J. Hickel, Secretary of the Interior

435 F.2d 440 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 19, 1970

Pancoastal Petroleum, Ltd. v. Udall, 121 U.S.App.D.C. at 195, 348 F.2d at 807. As stressed in Udall v. … Such a case was Pike v.

Heffernan v. Azar

317 F. Supp. 3d 94 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 27, 2018

Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP v. IRS , 537 F.Supp.2d 128 , 139 (D.D.C. 2008) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). … See Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP , 537 F.Supp.2d at 139 .

Schaefer v. McHugh

608 F.3d 851 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 2010

The courts review the Correction Board’s decision under the Administrative Procedure Act’s arbitrary and capricious standard. Kidwell v. Department of the Army, 56 F.3d 279, 286 (D.C. Cir. 1995). … When assessing a Correction Board decision, courts employ an “unusually deferential application of the arbitrary or capricious standard.” Musengo v. White, 286 F.3d 535, 538 (D.C.

Porco v. Huerta

472 F. App'x 2 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 21, 2012

In the past, the Board had used several formulations for its deferential standard of review of ALJ credibility determinations. See, e.g., Chirino v. NTSB, 849 F.2d 1525 , 1530 & n. 6 (D.C.Cir.1988). … The Board properly examined the objective facts relating to Porco’s arrest in evaluating whether she knew her answer to Question 18v was false at the time she made it. See Cooper v.

Keiko Asai v. Leonel J. Castillo, Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service. Keiko Asai v. Attorney General of the United States

593 F.2d 1222 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 13, 1979

Ballenilla-Gonzalez v. I.N.S., 546 F.2d 515, 521 (2d Cir. 1976). … Bearing upon the question of jurisdiction, see Gena v. INS, 424 F.2d 227, 231-32 (5th Cir. 1970) and Luna-Benalcazar v.

United States v. Bernardo Bruce

939 F.2d 1053 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 2, 1991

Brown, 915 F.2d 219, 224 (6th Cir.1990) (“However broadly it may be construed, section 924(c)(1) will not support a conviction for mere possession of a firearm during the course of criminal conduct.”); United States v. … In United States v.

United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Modern Air Transport, Inc., Quaker City Airways, Inc., All American Airways, Inc., Intervenors. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Quaker City Airways, Inc., Modern Air Transport, Inc., All American Airways, Inc., Intervenors. Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Quaker City Airways, Inc., Modern Air Transport, Inc., All American Airways, Inc., Intervenors. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Modern Air Transport, Inc., Supplemental Air Carrier Conference, United States Overseas Airlines, Inc., Quaker City Airways, Inc., All American Airways, Inc., Intervenors. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Quaker City Airways, Inc., United States Overseas Airlines, Inc., Supplemental Air Carrier Conference, Modern Air Transport, Inc., All American Airways, Inc., Intervenors. American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Quaker City Airways, Inc., United States Overseas Airlines, Inc., Supplemental Air Carrier Conference, Modern Air Transport, Inc., All American Airways, Inc., Intervenors. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Quaker City Airways, Inc., Modern Air Transport, Inc., All American Airways, Inc., Intervenors. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Modern Air Transport, Inc., Quaker City Airways, Inc., All American Airways, Inc., Intervenors. National Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Modern Air Transport, Inc., Quaker City Airways, Inc., All American Airways, Inc., Intervenors

278 F.2d 446 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 7, 1960

TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. … AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent.

Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, Winfield Manufacturing Company, Inc., Intervenor. Winfield Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers Ofamerica, Intervenor

424 F.2d 818 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 2, 1970

The only question presented on judicial review is whether the Board has reasonably exercised its discretion in the matter. Pepperell Mfg. Co. v. … Stevens remedy,' which would require the publication of the Board's mandates through oral explanation of the Board's ruling on this case to assembled employees on Company time. J. P. Stevens (I) v.

Alfred Morris v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

702 F.2d 1037 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 8, 1983

Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). … As we recently noted, Brown held Title VII to be “the exclusive source of judicial remedies for discrimination arising out of federal employment.” Borrell v.

United States v. Fredrico E. Loundmannz

472 F.2d 1376 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 26, 1973

The inference here is stronger than existed in De Bruhl v. United States, 91 U.S. … Daniels v. United States, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 250, 252 , 393 F.2d 359, 361 (1968).

First National Bank v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

225 F.2d 33 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 2, 1955

Bank v. Kearny Fed. Sav. & L. Ass’n, 3 Cir., 1951, 187 F.2d 564 , certiorari denied, 1951, 342 U.S. 816 , 72 S.Ct. 30 , 96 L.Ed. 617 , and Springfield Institution for Savings v. Worcester Fed. Sav. & L. … McGrath, 339 U.S. 33 , 70 S.Ct. 445 , 94 L.Ed. 616 ; Riss & Co. v. United States, 341 U.S. 907 , 71 S.Ct. 620 , 95 L.Ed. 1345 ; Cates v. Haderlein, 342 U.S. 804 , 72 S.Ct. 47 , 96 L.Ed. 609 ; United States v. L. A.

Roberts v. Nat'l Transp. Safety Bd.

894 F.3d 406 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 10, 2018

Roberts for attorney’s fees and expenses he incurred in 2014 and 2015 in connection with his successful petition for judicial review in Roberts v. National Transportation Safety Board, 776 F.3d 918 (D.C. … Our decision in Roberts v. National Transportation Safety Board became final on April 23, 2015.

Harry Kenneth Clark v. Library of Congress

750 F.2d 89 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 24, 1984

Since, as the Supreme Court noted in Brown v. … Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967). 18 .

Jonal Corporation v. District of Columbia

533 F.2d 1192 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 21, 1976

E. g., American Telephone and Telegraph Co. v. F. C. C., 449 F.2d 439, 455 (2d Cir. 1971); Kinsella v. Board of Education of Central School District No. 7, 378 F.Supp. 54, 60 (W.D.N.Y.1974); Toney v. … See SEC v. R. A. Holman & Co., 323 F.2d 284 (2d Cir. 1963). .

Hill v. Smoot

308 F. Supp. 3d 14 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 29, 2018

Anyanwutaku , 151 F.3d at 1056 (finding Heck inapplicable to claim where success in the district court "would have earned nothing more than a 'ticket to get in the door of the parole board' ") (quoting Neal v. … (citing cases); see also Brown v. Hill , 174 F.Supp.3d 66 , 71 (D.D.C. 2016) (examining cases); Hudes v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. , 806 F.Supp.2d 180 , 195-96 (D.D.C. 2011), aff'd , 493 Fed.Appx. 107 (D.C.

Western Coal Traffic League v.

108 F.4th 905 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 26, 2024

If a “carrier is revenue adequate,” the Board considers whether “a complaining shipper may be entitled to rate relief.” W. Tex. Utils. Co. v. Burlington N. … s argument by analogy to Fox Television Stations, Inc. v.

Musengo, James v. Caldera, Louis

286 F.3d 535 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 16, 2002

Although this court has jurisdiction to review decisions of the Correction Board,5 we do so under an "unusually deferential application of the 'arbitrary or capricious' standard" of the APA. Kreis v. … Cir. 1995); Kreis v. Secretary of the Air Force, 866 F.2d 1508, 1512 (D.C. Cir. 1989) (citing Chappell v. Wallace, 462 U.S. 296 (1983)).

Nimro v. Davis

204 F.2d 734 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 28, 1953

The Board relies upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Standard Oil Co. of Cal. *736 v. … V, 1952).

Ethnic Employees of the Library of Congress v. Boorstin

751 F.2d 1405 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 11, 1985

The Constitutional Claims: The Effect of Brown v. … The district court dismissed these claims, relying on Brown v.

Fletcher v. Jones

105 F.2d 58 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 10, 1939

The members of the Board shall constitute the Board of Directors of the Corporation and shall serve as such directors without additional compensation.” 12 U.S.C.A. § 1463 . 3 Nortz v. … See also, Finney v.