Case law

D&S Consulting, Inc. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

961 F.3d 1209 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 19, 2020

Co. v. U.S. Dist. Court for  4 W. Dist. of Texas, 571 U.S. 49, 60 (2013). … See Phillips v. Audio Active Ltd., 494 F.3d 378, 386 (2d Cir. 2007).

Figueroa v. Tillerson

289 F. Supp. 3d 212 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 31, 2018

And in Alvarado v. … Watson v.

United States v. James A. Conlon

661 F.2d 235 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 13, 1981

Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 80 , 62 S.Ct. 457, 469 , 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942); United States v. … See, e. g., United States v. Girard, 601 F.2d 69, 72 (2d Cir. 1979); United States v. Browning, Inc., 572 F.2d 720, 725 (10th Cir. 1978).

United States v. Rayburn House, Rm 2113, Washington, Dc

497 F.3d 654 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 3, 2007

See Brown & Williamson, 62 F.3d at 418 -19 (citing MINPECO, S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 844 F.2d 856, 857-59 (D.C.Cir.1988)). … v.

Hardison v. Alexander

655 F.2d 1281 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 26, 1981

For a general discussion of the Army’s officer selection process see Ford, Officer Selection Boards and Due Process of Law, 70 Mil.L.Rev. 137 (1975). See also Dilley v. … Kalb v.

Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. Clark

177 F.2d 79 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 11, 1949

They have neither the necessary • authority nor the necessary qualifications for such work.” 143 F.2d at page 151 , citing Standard Computing Scale Company v. Farrell, supra. See also National War Labor Board v. … Marbury v. Madison; Keim v. United States; Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, supra.

United States v. Ali Ali

718 F.3d 929 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 11, 2013

Before: BROWN, Circuit Judge, and EDWARDS and SILBERMAN, Senior Circuit Judges.  2 BROWN, Circuit Judge: Ali Mohamed Ali, a Somali national, helped negotiate the ransom of a merchant vessel … Wielding AK-47s and a rocket-propelled grenade, the raiders fired warning shots, boarded the ship, and seized the crew.

Oglala Sioux Tribe v. NRC

45 F.4th 291 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 9, 2022

v. … Nevada v.

Farmer v. International Fur & Leather Workers Union

221 F.2d 862 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 15, 1955

status under § 9(h) of the National Labor Relations Act. 1 *This appeal followed the District Court’s grant of a preliminary injunction on the authority of our decision in Farmer v. … This conviction is now pending on appeal in t lis court (Gold v. United States, No. 12,332). . Nor does the Act empower the Board to reject Gold’s 1954 affidavit on the ground that his 1950 affidavit was false.

James R. Nestor v. Lewis B. Hershey

425 F.2d 504 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 16, 1969

Bowen v. Hershey, 410 F.2d 962 (1st Cir. 1969); Crane v. Hershey, 410 F.2d 966 (1st Cir. 1969); Carey v. Local Board No. 2, 412 F.2d 71 (2d Cir. 1969); Marsano v. Laird, 412 F.2d 65 (2d Cir. 1969); Foley v. … This is the manner in which the Second Circuit has chosen to read Local Board Memorandum No. 87. See Marsano v. Laird, 412 F.2d 65, 69 (2d Cir. 1969); Carey v. Local Board No. 2, 297 F.

Despina Spirides v. John E. Reinhardt, Director of United States International Communication Agency

613 F.2d 826 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 10, 1979

A second appeal to the Appeals Review Board confirmed USICA’s decision. … See also Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 826-28 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). 10 . Pub.L.No.92-261, § 717, 86 Stat. 211 , 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16 (Supp. II 1972).

McGettigan v. National Bank of Washington

320 F.2d 703 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 16, 1963

Finally it is not contended that defendants had attempted either to remove the trash or to board up the premises. … See, e. g., Brown v. Kendall, 6 Cush. (60 Mass.) 292 (1850) ; 8 Holdsworth, History of English Law, 446-59 (1937). .

Jones v. Johnston

534 F.2d 353 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 23, 1976

See Cooper v. Lockhart, 489 F.2d 308, 314-15 (8th Cir. 1973); Sutherland v. District of Columbia Board of Parole, 366 F.Supp. 270, 272 (D.D.C.1973). See also, Lawrence v. … Board of Parole, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 248 , 345 F.2d 737 (1965). . Tippitt v. Wood, supra, 140 F.2d at 692 ; Mock v. U. S. Board of Parole, supra, 345 F.2d at 739 . .

Ortiz-Diaz v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development

867 F.3d 70 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 2, 2016

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C. Cir. 1999). The district court granted summary judgment to the Department on the ground that Ortiz-Diaz failed to show that he suffered an adverse employment action. … Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 ; see also Stewart, 352 F.3d at 426 .

Brawner Building, Inc. v. R. Roderick Shehyn, Walter E. Washington, Commissioner, District of Columbia

442 F.2d 847 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 23, 1971

The Board’s decisions are subject to review in the District Court. McCloskey v. Scrivener, 238 F.Supp. 497 (D.D.C.1965). … Connor v.

Saturn Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Dan-Air Services, Ltd., Intervenors. Lynn Michelle Tschirhart and Paul Jeffrey Tschirhart v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Americans for Charter Travel, Intervenors. National Air Carrier Association, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Dan-Air Services, Ltd., Intervenors. Transworld Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Lynn M. Tschirhart, Intervenors. Pan American World Airways Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, National Air Carrier Association, Inc., Intervenors. American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, National Air Carrier Association, Inc., Intervenors. American Society of Travel Agents, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, National Air Carrier Association, Inc. And Overseas National Airways, Inc., Saturn Airways, Inc., Intervenors. Master Executive Council of the Air Line Pilots in the Employ of United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, National Air Carrier Association, Inc., Intervenors

483 F.2d 1284 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 11, 1973

NATIONAL AIR CARRIER ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Dan-Air Services, Ltd., et al., Intervenors. TRANSWORLD AIRLINES, INC., Petitioner, v. … CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Lynn M. Tschirhart et al., Intervenors. PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS INC., Petitioner, v.

Leedom v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 108

278 F.2d 237 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 24, 1960

National Labor Relations Board v. … to the union); National Labor Relations Board v.

S. S. W., Inc. v. Air Transport Ass'n of America

191 F.2d 658 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 12, 1951

Nor does the fact that Board approval of the agreements and understandings charged in the complaint has not yet been obtained alter our conclusion. As the Supreme Court said in U. S. Navigation Co. v. Cunard S. S. … See Terminal Warehouse v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 1936, 297 U.S. 560 , 513-514, 56 S.Ct. 546 , 80 L.Ed. 827 . . Keogh v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co., 1922, 260 U.S. 156, 162 , 43 S.Ct. 47 , 67 L.Ed. 183 . . Georgia v.

Vermont Information Processing, Inc. v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 26, 2026

But the Board did not cite this reasoning below and therefore cannot raise it now. See SEC v. … v.

Hyman G. Gottlieb v. Federico F. Pena, Secretary of Transportation, Robert L. Gazlay v. Federico F. Pena, Secretary of Transportation

41 F.3d 730 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 6, 1994

Gazlay v. Busey, 819 F.Supp. at 31 . In Gazlay v. Busey, the district court relied on language in Brock v. … Gazlay’s contention that the Board’s final decision was arbitrary because it was made solely to avoid establishing a precedent that would result in a flood of applications to the Board is unpersuasive. See Gazlay v.