Case law

Blumenthal v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

613 F.3d 1142 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 16, 2010

Before: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and BROWN and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH. … Cerro Wire & Cable v. FERC, 677 F.2d 124, 128 (D.C. Cir. 1982); see Moreau v. FERC, 982 F.2d 556, 568 (D.C. Cir. 1993).

The Ripon Society, Inc. v. National Republican Party the Ripon Society, Inc. v. National Republican Party

525 F.2d 548 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 28, 1975

Board of Educ., 387 U.S. 105 , 87 S.Ct. 1549 , 18 L.Ed.2d 650 (1967) and Fortson v. Morris, 385 U.S. 231 , 87 S.Ct. 446 , 17 L.Ed.2d 330 (1966) is misplaced. … In Sailorsf a county school board was held to perforn| only “administrative” duties, and was there) fore outside the scope of the one person-oné vote principle. Compare Hadley v.

Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 28, 2026

“Judicial review ensures that the Board stays within statutory and constitutional limits.” Circus Circus Casinos, Inc. v. NLRB, 961 F.3d 469, 475 (D.C. Cir. 2020). … We must vacate the Board’s decision if it is “arbitrary, capricious, or grounded in legal error,” or if substantial evidence does not support the Board’s findings of fact. Longmont United Hosp. v.

Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. United States Navy

738 F.3d 425 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 27, 2013

Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp., 429 U.S. 252, 266 (1977) (citing Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 339 (1960); Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886)). … The chaplains say that under Larson v.

Menkes v. Department of Homeland Security

486 F.3d 1307 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 15, 2007

Cir. 1995) (reviewing decision of military review board where board “may excuse failure to file” if in the “interest of justice”); Marshall County Health Care Auth. v. Shalala, 988 F.2d 1221, 1223-25 (D.C. … For this point, he relies primarily on Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209, 234-35 (1977).

Oncor Elec. Delivery Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

887 F.3d 488 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 13, 2018

NLRB v. Local Union No. 1229, Int’l Board of Elec. Workers, 346 U.S. 464, 472 (1953). … See Tradesmen Int’l, Inc. v. NLRB, 275 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Cir. 2002). The Board properly found the former met here; we now turn to the latter.

Lawrence Typographical Union v. McCulloch

349 F.2d 704 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 6, 1965

National Labor Relations Board v. Internat’l Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 308 U.S. 413 , 60 S.Ct. 306 , 84 L.Ed. 354 (1940); American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations Board, 308 U.S. 401 , 60 S. … Even an unreasonable departure from a rule of the Board is not reviewable by the District Court on the principle of Leedom v. Kyne unless the rule is expressly required by the Act. See McLeod v.

Frank W. McCulloch Etc. v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co.

403 F.2d 916 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 13, 1969

Lawrence Typographical Union v. McCulloch, 121 U.S.App.D.C. 269, 271 , 349 F.2d 704, 706 (1965). It may enjoin threatened Board action which violates the Constitution. Id. at 273 , 349 F.2d at 708 . … The major case is Leedom v.

Bloch, Felix S. v. Powell, Colin L.

348 F.3d 1060 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 21, 2003

Bloch’s waiver was valid and binding,’’ Bloch v. Albright, 43 F. Supp. 2d 17, 21 (D.D.C. 1999), and thus remanded to the Board. … The Supreme Court’s formulation in Board of Regents of State Colleges v.

United States v. Gregory Errington Gaulteau

4 F.3d 1003 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 21, 1993

United States v. … Wheeler, 972 F.2d 927, 930 (8th Cir.1992); United States v.

Hilyer v. Morrison-Knudsen Construction Co.

670 F.2d 208 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 1, 1981

Leslie v. Reynolds, 179 Kan. 422 , 295 P.2d 1076, 1083 (1956). . In W. W. Cross v. … Similarly, in Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v.

Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Certain Carriers, Etc.

349 F.2d 207 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 1965

Trainmen v. … Fire. & Eng. v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.

In re Al-Nashiri

791 F.3d 71 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 23, 2016

The Copyright Royalty Board (Board) sets the terms and conditions of copyright licensing agreements by conducting ratemaking proceedings. See id. at 1334-35 . … See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754, 762 (D.C.Cir.2014) (“An erroneous district court ruling on an ... issue by itself does not justify mandamus. The error has to be clear.”).

National Courier Association and Purolator Courier Corp. v. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Cameron Financial Corp., and Courier Express Corp., Intervenor. Independent Bankers Association of America, Inc., a Non-Profit Corporation v. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Cameron Financial Corp., Intervenors

516 F.2d 1229 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 1975

. § 552 (b)(5) (1970); EPA v. … In Independent Bankers Ass'n v.

De Benque v. United States

85 F.2d 202 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 11, 1936

Bryant v. United States (C.C.A.) 214 F. 51 ; Hammers v. United States (C.C.A.) 279 F. 265 . … We have in Egan v.

Roland A. Corley v. United States

365 F.2d 884 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 1966

The only evidence tending to connect appellant with the crimes was Brown’s identification of him. … See De Binder v. United States, Gordan v. United States, and Simmons v. United States, supra. Reversed and remanded for a new trial. . In Cross v.

Hastings v. Earth Satellite Corp.

628 F.2d 85 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 19, 1980

The Board has clearly taken the view that the repeal of section 14(m) should not be applied retroactively. Davis v. George Hyman Constr. Co., 9 B.R.B.S. 127 (1978); Correia v. … . § 905 (b)); Drachenberg v. Canal Barge Co., 571 F.2d 912 (5th Cir. 1978) (same). . See Addison v.

Brawner Building, Inc. v. R. Roderick Shehyn, Walter E. Washington, Commissioner, District of Columbia

442 F.2d 847 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 23, 1971

The Board’s decisions are subject to review in the District Court. McCloskey v. Scrivener, 238 F.Supp. 497 (D.D.C.1965). … Connor v.

Barry W. Wolfe v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the Army

835 F.2d 354 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 18, 1987

Although this power is a discretionary one, the Correction Board is not without guidance. The Correction Board can only exercise its discretion for the benefit of the individual member. Doyle v. … Henderson v.

United States v. Ali Ali

718 F.3d 929 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 11, 2013

Before: BROWN, Circuit Judge, and EDWARDS and SILBERMAN, Senior Circuit Judges.  2 BROWN, Circuit Judge: Ali Mohamed Ali, a Somali national, helped negotiate the ransom of a merchant vessel … Wielding AK-47s and a rocket-propelled grenade, the raiders fired warning shots, boarded the ship, and seized the crew.