Case law

United States v. Irvin L. Stevenson, United States of America v. Bernard I. White

424 F.2d 923 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 1970

See generally United States v. Hayward, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 300 , 420 F.2d 142 (Nov. 18, 1969); Gass v. United States, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 11 , 416 F.2d 767 (1969); Gibson v. … In her charge to the jury, the trial judge included the “missing witness char ge.” 1 We are asked now, primarily upon the basis of our recent opinion in Brown v. United States, 134 U.S.App.

Adams v. Federal Aviation Administration

550 F.3d 1174 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 19, 2008

ADAMS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. … Before: GINSBURG and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN.

National Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, City of Albuquerque and the Albuquerque Chamber of Commerce, Titusville-Cocoa Airport Authority, Huntsville-Madison Airport Authority, United Air Lines, Inc., Continental Airlines, Inc., Intervenors. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Continental Airlines, Inc., United Air Lines, Inc., Intervenors

392 F.2d 504 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 29, 1968

v. … Civil Aeronautics Board, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 46 , 50, 228 F.2d 17, 21 (1955) 20 Delta Air Lines v.

Chambers v. Lucas

41 F.2d 299 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 5, 1930

The rule as to computing time in cases of this sort was early announced by the Supreme Court in Sheets v. Selden’s Lessee, 2 Wall. 177, 190 , 17 L. … Florsheim Brothers Dry Goods Co. v. United States, 280 U. S. 453 , 50 S. Ct. 215 , 74 L. Ed. 542 ; Lucas v. Pilliod Lumber Co. (April 14, 1930) 50 S. Ct. 297 , 74 L. Ed. 829 .

Frank D. Crum v. General Adjustment Bureau and Home Indemnity Company, General Adjustment Bureau and Home Indemnity Company v. Frank D. Crum

738 F.2d 474 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 6, 1984

(“BRB” or “Board”). … But the BRB was not entitled to review this matter de novo; rather, the Board was bound by the AU’s determination if supported by substantial evidence. See Bath Iron Works Corp. v.

Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees v. United Transport Service Employees of America

137 F.2d 817 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 2, 1943

From said judgment the Board perfected no appeal, and the intervening Brotherhood is the sole appellant. In Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. … Trainmen v.

Keyworth C. Birch, Jr. v. Sam A. Anderson

358 F.2d 520 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 9, 1965

But we find support in the dicta of the Eighth Circuit in Sprouse v. Settle, 274 F.2d 681 . Since Taylor v. Godwin, supra, relies primarily upon Schiffman v. … We commented upon this problem in Mock v. U. S. Board of Parole, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 248 , 345 F.2d 737 . 4 . Att’y Gen. Survey of Release Procedures 29-31 (1939) herein cited as Survey. 5 . Survey, 493. 6 . H.R.Rep.

George Smith, Jr. v. United States of America, Johnny B. Rozier, Jr. v. United States

418 F.2d 1120 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 1969

In Ingram v. United States, 122 U.S. … See Irby v. United States, supra, 129 U.S.App.D.C. at 20 , 390 F.2d at 435 . . United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 (1966). . Hedgepeth v.

Washington Hospital Center v. Butler

384 F.2d 331 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 29, 1967

Rodgers v. Lawson, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 281, 282 , 170 F.2d 157, 158 (1948). See also Brown v. Keaveny, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 117 , 118, 326 F.2d 660, 661 (1963); Quick v. … See also Grubb v. Groover, 62 App.D.C. 305 , 67 F.2d 511 (1933), cert. denied 291 U.S. 660 , 54 S.Ct. 377 , 78 L.Ed. 1052 (1934). . See Brown v.

United States v. James A. Conlon

661 F.2d 235 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 13, 1981

Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 80 , 62 S.Ct. 457, 469 , 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942); United States v. … See, e. g., United States v. Girard, 601 F.2d 69, 72 (2d Cir. 1979); United States v. Browning, Inc., 572 F.2d 720, 725 (10th Cir. 1978).

Lanier Ramer v. William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of the United States

522 F.2d 695 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 1975

Littleton, supra. . . . ” There is no necessity for rewalking the grounds since explored and occupied by Pickus v. United States Board of Parole, 165 U.S.App.D.C. 284 , 507 F.2d 1107 (1974). … Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkle, 416 U.S. 115 , 94 S.Ct. 1694 , 40 L.Ed.2d 1 (1974), supra; Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 125 , 93 S.Ct. 705 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973); Brown v.

Local 58, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO v. NLRB

888 F.3d 1313 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 8, 2018

Union of Elevator Constructors Local Union No. 8 v. NLRB, 665 F.2d 376, 382 (D.C. Cir. 1981).  7 In Scofield v. … The Board relied on Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co., 253 NLRB 721, 731-32 (1980), enf’d sub nom. Peninsula Shipbuilders’ Ass’n v. NLRB, 663 F.2d 488 (4th Cir. 1981).

United States v. Holmes

505 F.3d 1288 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 23, 2007

Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 (1996); United States v. Brown, 334 F.3d 1161, 1164 (D.C. … See Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 602 (1975); United States v. Wood, 981 F.2d 536, 541 (D.C.

Frank A. Schuler, Jr. v. United States of America, Department of State

617 F.2d 605 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 7, 1979

The Board’s regulations were effective on April 1, 1976, and appellant filed his grievance on August 27 of that year. . Our ruling follows the decision of this court in Oppenheim v. … See Wallace v. Lynn, 165 U.S.App.D.C. 363, 367 , 507 F.2d 1186, 1190 (1974).

In re Al-Nashiri

791 F.3d 71 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 23, 2016

The Copyright Royalty Board (Board) sets the terms and conditions of copyright licensing agreements by conducting ratemaking proceedings. See id. at 1334-35 . … See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754, 762 (D.C.Cir.2014) (“An erroneous district court ruling on an ... issue by itself does not justify mandamus. The error has to be clear.”).

Jo Spence v. DVA

109 F.4th 531 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 23, 2024

Claiming the action was retaliatory, Spence challenged her termination before the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”). … Appellant Br. 10 (quoting Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (cleaned up)).

Richard W. Shear v. The National Rifle Association of America, a New York Corporation

606 F.2d 1251 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 22, 1979

Parr v. … See Conley v.

Bernard Feinberg v. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

522 F.2d 1335 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 17, 1975

See, e. g., United States v. Brown, 484 F.2d 418 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 960 , 94 S.Ct. 1490 , 39 L.Ed.2d 575 (1974); United States v. … Board of Educ., 456 F.2d 399 , 403 n.2 (8th Cir. 1972) (discharge of public school teacher); Caulder v.

United States v. Eric Brodie

742 F.3d 1058 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 18, 2014

See United States v. Brown, 401 F.3d 588, 595 (4th Cir. 2005); see also United States v. Brown, 448 F.3d 239, 246 (3d Cir. 2006). The government argues that our decision in United States v. … Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603-04 (1975). For  8 this inquiry, the government bears the burden of demonstrating admissibility. Id. at 604.

Moran v. Sightler

83 F.2d 595 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 30, 1936

The following authorities by analogy sustain this view: Dakin v. Bayly, 290 U.S. 143, 146 , 54 S.Ct. 113 , 78 L.Ed. 229 , 90 A.L.R. 999 ; Hanover Nat. Bank v. … Suddath, 215 U.S. 110 , 30 S.Ct. 58 , 54 L.Ed. 115 ; Western Tie & Timber Co. v. Brown, 196 U.S. 502 , 25 S.Ct. 339 , 49 L.Ed. 571 . Affirmed.