Case law

We People Foundation, Inc. v. United States

485 F.3d 140 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 8, 2007

Likewise, in Minnesota State Board for Community Colleges v. … Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 92-93 , 90 S.Ct. 1893 , 26 L.Ed.2d 446 (1970); Browning-Ferris Indus. of Vt., Inc. v.

Clarian Health West, LLC v. Eric Hargan

878 F.3d 346 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 26, 2017

See Perez v. Mortg. Bankers Ass’n, 135 S. … Koch v. Cox, 489 F.3d 384, 391 (D.C. Cir. 2007); see Yee v.

Local Union No. 749, International Brotherhood Of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

466 F.2d 343 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 16, 1972

See N.L.R.B. v. General Motors Corp., 373 U.S. 734, 742, 743 , 83 S.Ct. 1453 , 10 L.Ed.2d 670 (1963). 2 See, e. g., I.U.E., Local 801 v. … Philadelphia Iron Works, Inc., 211 F.2d 937, 941 (3rd Cir. 1954); N.L.R.B. v. Pape Broadcasting Co., 217 F.2d 197, 199 (5th Cir. 1954); J. A. Utley Co. v. N.L.R.B., 217 F.2d 885, 886 (6th Cir. 1954); N.L.R.B. v.

Adams v. Federal Aviation Administration

550 F.3d 1174 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 19, 2008

ADAMS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. … Before: GINSBURG and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN.

United States v. Glenn I. Wright, United States of America v. Dennis Moss

783 F.2d 1091 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 18, 1986

Wright relies on United States v. Brown, 428 F.2d 1100 (D.C.Cir.1970), to support his argument that the district court’s acceptance of his stipulations was in error. … We have reiterated Brown’s concern for mentally disturbed defendants in later cases. See United States v. Dorsey, 449 F.2d 1104, 1107-08 (D.C.Cir.1971).

Bradley Waterman v. IRS

61 F.4th 152 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 21, 2023

Campbell v. U.S. Dep’t of Just., 164 F.3d 20, 30 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (quoting King v. U.S. Dep’t of Just., 830 F.2d 210, 217 (D.C. Cir. 1987); Hayden v. Nat’l Sec. Agency, 608 F.2d 1381, 1387 (D.C. Cir. 1979)). … Prepared by OPR analyst Kevin Brown and addressed to a section manager in the Legal Analysis Branch, the Brown Memo was written for the purpose of recording his analysis of the disciplinary referral.

Samara Simmons v. Marco Rubio

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 17, 2026

Finally, the court dismissed count V’s challenge to the Board’s injunction barring further filings for lack of jurisdiction; Simmons lacked a right to submit further filings under the Board’s rules, which preclude filing … The Board’s reasoning was effectively “self-explanatory” under the circumstances. Tourus Recs., Inc. v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 259 F.3d 731, 737 (D.C.

Beaumont v. Helvering

73 F.2d 110 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1934

This is the rule of practice in the Board of Tax Appeals. Crider Brothers v. Commissioner, 10 B. T. A. 338, 350; Schilling Grain Co. v. Commissioner, 8 B. T. A. 1048, 1057; Evangeline Gravel Co. v. Commissioner, 13 B. … See Heiner v. Tindle, supra; Goldsborough v. Burnet, 46 F.(2d) 432 (C. C. A. 4th); Dresser v. U. S., 55 F.(2d) 499 (Ct.Cl.). The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. Affirmed. GRONER, Associate Justice.

Food Store Employees Union, Local No. 347 Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

476 F.2d 546 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 18, 1973

This court, while enforcing the Board’s order in part in Food Store Emp. U., Loc. 347, Amal. Meat Cut. v. … We have no warrant to fault the Board for taking these considerations into decisive account. 5 . N.L.R.B. v.

John H. Dunmar v. Stephen Ailes, Secretary of the Army

348 F.2d 51 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 20, 1965

Zuckert, 114 U.S.App.D.C. 39 , 309 F.2d 659 (1962), and Roberts v. … Carter v. McLaughry, 183 U.S. 365, 401 , 22 S.Ct. 181 , 46 L.Ed. 236 (1902).

National Labor Relations Board v. Blevins Popcorn Co.

744 F.2d 878 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 19, 1984

National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner v. Blevins Popcorn Co., Respondent No. 75-1748. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Sept. 19, 1984. Before WRIGHT, TAMM and LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judges. … order issued June 19, 1975, and by refusing and continuing to refuse, despite requests of Board agents, to sign and post copies of the Board's notice in accordance with the provisions of the Board's order. 4 By its conduct

Everett D. Green v. United States

218 F.2d 856 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 20, 1955

Goodall v. United States, 1950, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 148 , 180 F.2d 397 , 17 A.L.R.2d 1070 . … Burcham v. United States, 1947, 82 U.S.App.D.C. 283 , 163 F.2d 761 . All the testimony as to what occurred at the drug store pointed to murder in the first degree and nothing else. * * * ” See also Sparf and Hansen v.

Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington v. United States Department of Justice

846 F.3d 1235 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 31, 2017

True, as the Supreme Court explained in Renegotiation Board v. … Brown v. Plata, 563 U.S. 493, 538 (2011) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).

United States v. Lacy Stock, A/K/A Russell Rogers

948 F.2d 1299 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 22, 1991

See Ewing v. … It would defy common sense to think that the brown medicine vial in the dumpster belonged to someone else, and that the brown medicine vial in Stock’s hand was never recovered.

Local Union No. 2338, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Federal Pacific Electric Company, Local Union No. 2338, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Intervenor. Federal Pacific Electric Company v. National Labor Relations Board

499 F.2d 542 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 1974

P 10,117 LOCAL UNION NO. 2338, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … , see, e.g., Fibreboard Corp. v.

National Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, City of Albuquerque and the Albuquerque Chamber of Commerce, Titusville-Cocoa Airport Authority, Huntsville-Madison Airport Authority, United Air Lines, Inc., Continental Airlines, Inc., Intervenors. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Continental Airlines, Inc., United Air Lines, Inc., Intervenors

392 F.2d 504 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 29, 1968

v. … Civil Aeronautics Board, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 46 , 50, 228 F.2d 17, 21 (1955) 20 Delta Air Lines v.

Frank D. Crum v. General Adjustment Bureau and Home Indemnity Company, General Adjustment Bureau and Home Indemnity Company v. Frank D. Crum

738 F.2d 474 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 6, 1984

(“BRB” or “Board”). … But the BRB was not entitled to review this matter de novo; rather, the Board was bound by the AU’s determination if supported by substantial evidence. See Bath Iron Works Corp. v.

Kyle v. Interstate Commerce Commission

609 F.2d 540 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 26, 1979

Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16 , 85 S.Ct. 792 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965). … Davis v. Jimmy Carter, et al.; No. 79-1764, James W. Judkins v. Merit Systems Protection Board.

Keyworth C. Birch, Jr. v. Sam A. Anderson

358 F.2d 520 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 9, 1965

But we find support in the dicta of the Eighth Circuit in Sprouse v. Settle, 274 F.2d 681 . Since Taylor v. Godwin, supra, relies primarily upon Schiffman v. … We commented upon this problem in Mock v. U. S. Board of Parole, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 248 , 345 F.2d 737 . 4 . Att’y Gen. Survey of Release Procedures 29-31 (1939) herein cited as Survey. 5 . Survey, 493. 6 . H.R.Rep.

Federal Election Commission v. Committee to Elect Lyndon La Rouche

613 F.2d 849 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 19, 1980

Jones v. … In FTC v.