Case law

Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Aaxico Airlines, Inc., Saturn Airways, Inc., Intervenors

360 F.2d 837 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 28, 1966

AAXICO Airlines, Inc. v. Air Lines Pilots Ass’n, 331 F.2d 433 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 379 U.S. 933 , 85 S.Ct. 333 , 13 L.Ed.2d 344 (1964). … In Flight Engineers’ Int’l Ass’n, etc. v. CAB, 118 U.S.App.D.C. 112 , 332 F. 2d 312 (1964), similar contentions were before us.

Blackman Ex Rel. Blackman v. District of Columbia

633 F.3d 1088 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 28, 2011

BROWN, Circuit Judge, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge, each filed opinions concurring in the result. … The history goes back at least to Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia, 348 F.Supp. 866 (D.D.C.1972).

Maria Esparraguera v. Department of the Army

101 F.4th 28 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 10, 2024

Berger v. … 931 F.2d at 617; see supra Section II.A.  10 Board of Education v.

Major Adolph H. Knehans, Jr. v. Clifford L. Alexander, Secretary of the Army

566 F.2d 312 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 3, 1977

See, e. g., Horn v. Schlesinger, 514 F.2d 549, 551 (8th Cir. 1975); Sohm v. Fowler, 124 U.S.App.D.C. 382 , 365 F.2d 915 (1966); McCurdy v. … See, e. g., Hodges v.

United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Local 5571 v. National Labor Relations Board, Stanley-Artex Windows, Division of the Stanley Works, Intervenor. Stanley-Artex Windows, Division of the Stanley Works v. National Labor Relations Board, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Local 5571, Intervenor

401 F.2d 434 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 3, 1968

The Board was plainly justified in finding no unfair labor practice; this was a small matter resulting from 'circumstances which the Board could or should accept as excusing or justifying unilateral action.' NLRB v. … See also Solo Cup Co. v.

United States v. Rapheal Earl Brown, Jr.

8 F.3d 71 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 27, 1993

UNITED STATES of America v. Rapheal Earl BROWN, Jr., Appellant. No. 92-3216. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Oct. 27, 1993. Before: WALD, WILLIAMS and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges. … See United States v.

Millis v. Inland Empire District Council

144 F.2d 539 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 24, 1944

National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , which held that the District Court had no power to review a similar certification of the National Mediation *540 Board. Reilly v. … Employers Group of Motor Freight Carriers, Inc., v. National War Labor Board, - U.S.App.D.C. -, 143 F.2d 145 . Reversed.

Thompson v. District of Columbia

428 F.3d 283 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 2005

Hall v. … The Board cannot prevail in a balancing test with no record evidence on its side of the scale. Nothing in Koch v.

Jason v. Summerfield, Postmaster General

214 F.2d 273 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 10, 1954

B. v. … United Public Workers v. Mitchell, 1947, 330 U.S. 75 , 67 S.Ct. 556 , 91 L.Ed. 754 ; Kutcher v. Gray, 1952, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 266 , 199 F. 2d 783 ; and Deak v. Pace, 1950, 88 U.S. App.D.C. 50, 185 F.2d 997 .

Junius Joyner, III v. Morrison and Foerster LLP

140 F.4th 523 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 2025

Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1022 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (quoting George v. … Brown, 774 F.3d at 1023.

Daryl Becker v. Surface Transportation Board and United States of America, T and P Railway, Inc. And American Trails Association, Inc., Intervenors

132 F.3d 60 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 30, 1997

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. … Nevertheless, the Board, relying on Birt v.

Boling v. U.S. Parole Comm'n

290 F. Supp. 3d 37 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 30, 2017

In February 1999, the District of Columbia Board of Parole (D.C. Board) released Mr. Boling, subject *42 to a 48-year period of supervision, until June 2047. Within months of Mr. … See Browning v. Clinton , 292 F.3d 235 , 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Moreover, in evaluating subject matter jurisdiction, the court "may consider materials outside the pleadings." Am. Freedom Law Ctr. v.

Local Union 676, Affiliated With the Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, M. F. A. Milling Company, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. M. F. A. Milling Company, Local Union 676, Affiliated With the Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. M. F. A. Milling Company v. National Labor Relations Board

463 F.2d 953 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 9, 1972

P 12,665 LOCAL UNION 676, Affiliated with the Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, M. F. A. Milling Company, Intervenor. … NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. M. F. A. MILLING COMPANY, Respondent, Local Union 676, Affiliated with the Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO, Intervenor. M. F. A.

Gilbert Ortiz, Jr. Nollie Plowman v. Secretary of Defense Secretary of the Army

41 F.3d 738 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 7, 1994

Ortiz v. … Muse v.

Michael Baxley v. Daniel Driscoll

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 2026

Rodgers v. … R.Rs. v. ICC, 978 F.2d 737, 740 (D.C.

John L. Haines v. Department of Transportation

449 F.2d 1073 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 21, 1971

United States v. Great Northern Ry. Co., 337 F.2d 243, 247 (8th Cir. 1964); Nadiak v. C.A.B., 305 F.2d 588, 593 (5th Cir. 1962). We see no reason to disturb the Board’s finding in this respect. … V, 1970). 3 . The Board order is designated Order No. EA-153 (March 12, 1970). 4 . The appeal was taken pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 1654 (b) (2) (Supp.

Scott B. Appleby v. Robert E. McLaughlin President, Board of Commissioners of the District of Columbia

239 F.2d 77 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 13, 1956

See Lewis v. District of Columbia (1951) 89 U.S.App. D.C. 72 [ 190 F.2d 25 ].” We do not think the court was clearly wrong. Affirmed.

James Clarence Moore v. Curtis Reid

246 F.2d 654 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 3, 1957

The Board got its facts from [Probation] Officers of the Board. “Neagles: What are the facts? “Moore: I sent mine down to court.” 10 . Johnson v. … Escoe v.

Laccetti v. SEC. & Exch. Comm'n

885 F.3d 724 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 23, 2018

LACCETTI, PETITIONER v. … Conley, Solicitor, and Dominick V. Freda, Assistant General Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission.

Dellums v. Powell

566 F.2d 216 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 1977

In Brown v. District of Columbia, 304 A.2d 292 (D.C.App.1973), the District of Columbia Court of Appeals held that an arrest report was defective as § 309 notice because it did not disclose any claim of injury. … Brown v. District of Columbia, supra note 56, is not to the contrary since the court held there that an arrest record was defective solely because it did not give notice that a claim for false arrest was being asserted.