Case law

United States v. Laureys

653 F.3d 27 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 19, 2011

Opinion dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … United States v. Burroughs, 613 F.3d 233, 248 (D.C.Cir.2010) (Brown, J., dissenting) (quoting United States v. Blackwell, 694 F.2d 1325, 1342 (D.C.Cir.1982)).

Gentila v. Pace, Secretary of the Army

193 F.2d 924 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 1952

Switchmen’s Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297, 305 , 64 S.Ct. 95, 99 , 88 L.Ed. 61 . … Davis v. Woodring, 72 App.D.C. 83 , 111 F.2d 523 ; Reid v. United States, D.C., 161 F. 469 , appeal dismissed, 211 U.S. 529 , 29 S.Ct. 171 , 53 L.Ed. 313 ; Nordmann v. Woodring, D.C., 28 F.Supp. 573 . 11 .

U.S. International Trade Commission v. ASAT, Inc.

411 F.3d 245 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 10, 2005

However, because it is not so clear that Steel Co. is inconsistent with the characterization of similar statutory language in LaRouche and FTC v. Browning, 435 F.2d 96 (D.C. … Browning, 435 F.2d at 100.

International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots, ILA, AFL-CIO v. NLRB

61 F.4th 169 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 2023

Furthermore, “judicial deference is not warranted where the Board fails to adequately explain its reasoning, or where the Board leaves critical gaps in its reasoning.” David Saxe Prods., LLC v. … Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, 579 U.S. 211, 221 (2016); see NLRB v. CNN Am., Inc., 865 F.3d 740, 748 (D.C.

American Mail Line, Ltd. v. James W. Gulick

411 F.2d 696 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 17, 1969

Cuneo v. McNamara, Civ.Action No. 1826-67 (D.D.C.1967); Kovic v. Gardner, Civ.Action No. 2008-67 (D.D.C. 1967); Bandy v. … See generally Pacific Far East Line, Inc. v. United States, 394 F.2d 990 , 184 Ct.Cl. 169 (1968); Lykes Bros. Steamship Co. v. United States, Ct.Cl. No. 399-67 (1968); Weiss v.

Colo. Fire Sprinkler, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

891 F.3d 1031 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 8, 2018

See, e.g., NLRB v. … See NLRB v.

Booster Lodge No. 405, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, the Boeing Company, Intervenor. The Boeing Company v. National Labor Relations Board, Booster Lodge No. 405, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

459 F.2d 1143 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 3, 1972

In Scofield v. … N.L.R.B. v. Mechanical and Allied Production Workers, Local 444, supra, 427 F.2d at 884-885; N.L.R. B. v. Granite State Joint Board, Textile Workers Union, Local 1029, supra, 446 F.2d at 372 .

Ralph Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.

512 F.2d 527 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 23, 1975

See United States v. Singer Manufacturing Co., 374 U.S. 174 , 194 n. 9, 83 S.Ct. 1773 , 10 L.Ed.2d 823 (1963); Case v. Morrisette, supra, 475 F.2d at 1307 ; Rowe v. … V.

Hagar Management Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

55 F.3d 684 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 21, 1995

HAGAR MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 94-1351. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. April 21, 1995. … Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge, BUCKLEY and GINSBURG, Circuit Judges JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. 1 This cause came to be heard on petition for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB" or "Board"), and was briefed

Shahady v. Atlas Tile & Marble Co.

673 F.2d 479 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 26, 1982

Because the Board is not a proper respondent in a section 921(c) review proceeding, McCord v. Benefits Review Board, 514 F.2d 198 (D.C. … See McCord v. Benefits Review Board, 514 F.2d 198 (D.C. Cir. 1975), and cases cited at note 9 infra. . Cf. DOWCP v.

United States v. Rapheal Earl Brown, Jr.

8 F.3d 71 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 27, 1993

UNITED STATES of America v. Rapheal Earl BROWN, Jr., Appellant. No. 92-3216. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Oct. 27, 1993. Before: WALD, WILLIAMS and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges. … See United States v.

John L. Haines v. Department of Transportation

449 F.2d 1073 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 21, 1971

United States v. Great Northern Ry. Co., 337 F.2d 243, 247 (8th Cir. 1964); Nadiak v. C.A.B., 305 F.2d 588, 593 (5th Cir. 1962). We see no reason to disturb the Board’s finding in this respect. … V, 1970). 3 . The Board order is designated Order No. EA-153 (March 12, 1970). 4 . The appeal was taken pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 1654 (b) (2) (Supp.

Herminio Armando Sanchez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

707 F.2d 1523 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 17, 1983

See INS v. … ); Chae Kim Ro v.

Troutbrook Company LLC v. NLRB

107 F.4th 994 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 12, 2024

Ass’n v. NLRB, 967 F.3d 878, 893 (D.C. … Bonanno Linen Serv., Inc. v.

Gilbert v. Wilson

292 F. Supp. 3d 426 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 27, 2018

Cir. 1997) (Air Force selective early retirement board); Paylor v. Winter , 600 F.Supp.2d 117 (D.D.C. 2009) (Navy promotion selection board); Ricks , 65 Fed.Cl. 826 (Air Force promotion selection board); Christensen v. … v.

Bayshore Cmty. Hosp. v. Hargan

285 F. Supp. 3d 9 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 25, 2017

In other words, they did not comply with the self-disallowance regulation before filing their appeal before the Board. See Bd. Decision at 5. The Board recognized this court's decision in Banner Heart Hospital v. … FBME Bank Ltd. v. Lew , 142 F.Supp.3d 70 , 73 (D.D.C. 2015) (citing SKF USA Inc. v. United States , 254 F.3d 1022 , 1028 (Fed. Cir. 2001) ; Ethyl Corp. , 989 F.2d at 523 ; Carpenters Indus. Council v.

Broyhill & Associates, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

911 F.2d 819 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 27, 1990

BROYHILL & ASSOCIATES, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 89-1701. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Aug. 27, 1990. … See Teamsters Local 175 v. NLRB, 788 F.2d 27 , 30 (D.C.Cir.1986). It is 3 FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the cross-application for enforcement be granted.

Thomas McLamb v. NLRB

141 F.4th 1308 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 1, 2025

Standard of Review “Judicial review of the Board’s decisions and orders must evaluate both the Board’s statements of law and application of law to the facts.” Circus Circus Casinos v. NLRB, 961 F.3d 469, 475 (D.C. … Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 477 (1951) (quotation omitted). We give “substantial deference to inferences drawn by the Board from the factual record.” Tenneco Auto., Inc. v.

Herbert T. Mitchell v. Warren Christopher, Secretary of State

996 F.2d 375 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 25, 1993

To be sure, in Railroad Yardmasters of America v. … Union v. United States, 987 F.2d 784 , 790 n. 4 (D.C.Cir.1993) (quoting Public Utilities Comm’n v.

Millis v. Inland Empire District Council

144 F.2d 539 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 24, 1944

National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , which held that the District Court had no power to review a similar certification of the National Mediation *540 Board. Reilly v. … Employers Group of Motor Freight Carriers, Inc., v. National War Labor Board, - U.S.App.D.C. -, 143 F.2d 145 . Reversed.