Case law

District of Columbia v. Jeppsen Ex Rel. Jeppsen

514 F.3d 1287 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 1, 2008

Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and BROWN, Circuit Judges.  2 Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge GINSBURG. … Alternatively, the District argues that under Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v.

Troutbrook Company LLC v. NLRB

107 F.4th 994 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 12, 2024

Ass’n v. NLRB, 967 F.3d 878, 893 (D.C. … Bonanno Linen Serv., Inc. v.

Franklin Investment Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Walter N. Tobriner, Constituting the Board of Commissioners for the District of Columbia

296 F.2d 451 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 7, 1961

In re Navy Chaplaincy

323 F. Supp. 3d 25 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 30, 2018

Act"); Wallace v. … Claim 3 MSJ at 39; see id. at 37-42 (first citing Larkin v. Grendel's Den, Inc. , 459 U.S. 116 , 103 S.Ct. 505 , 74 L.Ed.2d 297 (1982) ; and then citing Board of Education v.

Thomas McLamb v. NLRB

141 F.4th 1308 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 1, 2025

Standard of Review “Judicial review of the Board’s decisions and orders must evaluate both the Board’s statements of law and application of law to the facts.” Circus Circus Casinos v. NLRB, 961 F.3d 469, 475 (D.C. … Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 477 (1951) (quotation omitted). We give “substantial deference to inferences drawn by the Board from the factual record.” Tenneco Auto., Inc. v.

Holmes v. United States

11 F.2d 569 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 1, 1926

Keady v. People, 74 P. 892 , 32 Colo. 62 , 66 L. R. A. 353; Wright v. State, 18 Ga. 383, 391 ; Boyd v. State, 17 Ga. 194 ; Dilger v. Com., 11 S. W. 651 , 88 Ky. 550, 559 ; Lyons v. State, 9 Tex. App. 636; Alsop v. … Nor can we find any error in permitting the district attorney to examine the witness Pomeroy Brown as a hostile witness. The right to permit this was within the sound discretion of the court. St. Clair v. H. S., 14 S.

Natural Resources Defense Council v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

879 F.3d 1202 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 19, 2018

Robertson v. … Ass’n of Am. v. Dep’t of Transp., 119 F.3d 38, 43 (D.C. Cir. 1997). In this case, however, there was no inconsistency. The Councils misunderstand the Board’s reasoning. The Board rejected Dr.

Fountainview Care Center v. National Labor Relations Board

88 F.3d 1278 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 22, 1996

FOUNTAINVIEW CARE CENTER, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 95-1451. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. May 22, 1996. … It is therefore 2 ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition for review is denied, and the Board's cross-application for enforcement granted, substantially for the reasons set forth in the decision and order of the Board.

Simmons, Sebastian C v. Howard Univ

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 2, 1998

Brown argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant. Anita Barondes argued the cause for appellees. With her on the brief were Michael F. Kleine and Mose Lewis, III. … to represent them); Gustafson v.

Oglala Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n

896 F.3d 520 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 20, 2018

Ctr. v. Sebelius, 566 F.3d 193, 199 (D.C. … Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. at 87-88; see NLRB v.

Local 130, International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio v. Frank W. McCulloch Howard Jenkins, Boyd Leedom

345 F.2d 90 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 25, 1965

In declining to sanction district court jurisdiction a third time, Boire v. … See, in this connection, NLRB v. Local 182, Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters, etc., 314 F.2d 53 (2d Cir. 1963). 6 . Milk & Ice Cream Drivers, etc. v. McCulloch, 113 U.S.App.D.C. 156 , 306 F.2d 763 (1962); Leedom v.

Sunshine Book Company and Solair Union Naturisme, Inc. v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Individually and as Postmaster General of the United States

249 F.2d 114 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 3, 1957

See Kingsley Books, Inc., v. Brown, supra. It may be that the postal power would provide a basis for a Federal statute authorizing a similar form of judicial control. … Board of Regents of University of State of New York, 1953, 305 N.Y. 336, 350 , 113 N.E.2d 502, 512 , reversed sub nom. Superior Films v. Dept. of Education, 1954, 346 U.S. 587 , 74 S.Ct. 286 , 98 L.Ed. 329 . .

Kaseman v. District of Columbia

444 F.3d 637 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 31, 2006

Fund v. EPA, 672 F.2d 42, 62 (D.C. Cir. 1982). We have no cause to question the reasoning of Moore and Environmental Defense Fund, but the “semantic strain” between direct and implied causes of action, Brown v. … Zipperer v. Sch. Bd. of Seminole County, Fla., 111 F.3d 847, 851 (11th Cir. 1997); Brown, 12 F.3d at 683; Eggers v. Bullitt County Sch. Dist., 854 F.2d 892, 898 (6th Cir. 1988).

Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

380 F.2d 605 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 19, 1967

E.g., United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc., 344 U.S. 33, 37 , 73 S.Ct. 67 , 97 L.Ed. 54 (1952); Bower v. … Trainmen v. Certain Carriers, 121 U.S.App.D.C. 230, 232 , 349 F.2d 207 , 209 n. 7 (1965). . E.g., Bowman v. Curt G. Joa, Inc., 361 F.2d 706, 716 (4th Cir. 1966); Cranston Print Works Co. v.

United States v. Henson

486 F.2d 1292 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 17, 1973

In Cummings v. … McGautha v.

Windsor Redding Care Center, LLC v. NLRB

944 F.3d 294 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 10, 2019

Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. v. NLRB, 865 F.3d 630, 638 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (quoting Pirlott v. NLRB, 522 F.3d 423, 432 (D.C. Cir. 2008)). … Just as the board may not “totally ignore[] facts in the record,” Fred Meyer Stores, 865 F.3d at 638, the Board is obligated to give “attentive consideration” to the ALJ’s decision, Greater Boston Television Corp. v.

Harry Joseph Pollack and Arthur Morton Pollack v. Joy R. Simonson

350 F.2d 740 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 3, 1965

Compare Melody Music, Inc. v. Federal Communications Comm., 120 U.S.App.D.C. -, 345 F.2d 730 , decided April 8, 1965; Hornsby v. Allen, 326 F.2d 605 (5th Cir. 1964); Yick Wo v. … See Hornsby v. Allen, supra, note 4 .

Abdelfattah v. United States Department of Homeland Security

787 F.3d 524 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 15, 2015

Attorney, entered an appearance.  2 Before: BROWN and SRINIVASAN, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … Va. 2014) (plaintiff told he was on the No Fly List and denied boarding on a flight to United States); Latif v. Holder, 969 F. Supp. 2d 1293, 1296 (D.

Broyhill & Associates, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

911 F.2d 819 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 27, 1990

BROYHILL & ASSOCIATES, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 89-1701. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Aug. 27, 1990. … See Teamsters Local 175 v. NLRB, 788 F.2d 27 , 30 (D.C.Cir.1986). It is 3 FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the cross-application for enforcement be granted.

Abbott v. Shepherd

135 F.2d 769 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 31, 1942

The opinion of the Board of Appeals states: “Each count [in the Interference] definitely includes some limitation to the weaving or knitting yam.” Storck v. Reichhelm, 1916, 44 App.D.C. 438 ; McAfee v. … Gray, 1918, 47 App.D.C. 237 ; Lautenschlager v. Glass (1), 1918, 47 App.D.C. 443 ; Browning v. Johnson, 1921, 50 App.D.C. 335 , 271 F. 1017 ; Bijur v. Bendix, 1923, 52 App. D.C. 240 , 285 F. 974 ; Penn Oil Co. v.