Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,967 results
1.11s
Jones, Mabel S. v. Prince George Cty
348 F.3d 1014 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 14, 2003
Nina clearly suffers from an injury that the Prince George’s County defendants allegedly caused and that the requested relief would redress: the shooting deprived Nina of her father’s financial and emotional support, the … Although an existing party who is ineffectual, incompetent, or unwilling to raise claims or arguments that would benefit the putative intervenor may qualify as an inadequate representative in some cases, this is not such
Cited 67 timesPublishedUnited States v. Olabimpe Olejiya
754 F.3d 986 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 10, 2014
We assume without deciding that Akinadewo merely forfeited the issue because we conclude that he cannot establish plain error. See Tann, 532 F.3d at 872. … Franklin about the quantity of PCP on the street” to establish conspiracy’s entire amount was foreseeable by, and therefore attributable to, defendant).
Cited 11 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 8, 2025
And on the dispositive interpretive question addressed above, the TRO seems to me clearly ambiguous, which makes the imposition of criminal contempt clearly inappropriate. … Nonetheless, the district court denied Peru’s request to dismiss the suit on immunity grounds. Id.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNatural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
859 F.2d 156 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 20, 1988
ICC, 725 F.2d 716 , 726 (D.C.Cir.1984), will qualify as hardship. In Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. … The agency’s position is clearly final.
Cited 3 timesPublishedNational Ass'n of Manufacturers v. Securities & Exchange Commission
800 F.3d 518 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 18, 2015
I would conclude that interest qualifies as a substantial one under Central Hudson . … That a disclosure is factual, standing alone, does not immunize it from scrutiny because “[t]he right against compelled speech is not, and cannot be, restricted to ideological messages.”
Cited 47 timesPublishedRailway Labor Executives' Association v. Csx Transportation, Inc
938 F.2d 224 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 19, 1991
Congress clearly re- ' quires that sales transactions like P & LE’s proposal must satisfy the requirements of the ICA, but we find nothing in the RLA to prevent the immediate consummation of P & LE’s contract to sell. … CSXT argues that we may affirm the district court on the alternative ground that under the immunity clause in section 11341(a), the ICC’s approval of the sales preempts any bargaining and status quo obligations imposed by
Cited 8 timesPublished636 F.2d 838 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 2, 1981
Id. at 5, JA at 117. 7 We reverse the court’s ruling that any of these fifteen records qualified as congressional records. … Personnel and similar files whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy are protected by exemption 6, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (b)(6). 14 .
Vacated in part, on other grounds by Central Intelligence Agency v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for the Unification of World Christianity, 455 U.S. 997 (1982)Cited 35 timesPublishedCadbury Beverages, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
160 F.3d 24 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 17, 1998
Matzan’s conversation with Dennis about not turning to Graffius for assistance in obtaining a bonus clearly falls within this latter fine of cases. … But in concluding that that fact immunizes the company from liability, petitioner reads the disjunctive out of Ohmite, and seemingly asserts the baffling proposition that the Board must always engage in Ohmite’s balancing
Cited 31 timesPublished300 F. Supp. 3d 211 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 7, 2018
She was very qualified for what we, how we envisioned this office to be. … The standard for a new trial is less onerous than one for a motion for a judgment as a matter of law but " 'must clearly establish either a manifest error of law or fact or must present newly discovered evidence.' " Nyman
Cited 1 timesPublishedAtlas Copco, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency
642 F.2d 458 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 30, 1980
position is not, however, congruous with the scope of the regulation, which further contemplates a discretionary determination as to whether “any or all” compressors in the failing configuration must undergo more testing. 72 Clearly … While the focus of many of the issues pressed is on provisions outside the jurisdictional grant found in Section 16(a) of the Act, and thus are immune from our review, the Administrator’s product-testing program has received
Cited 10 timesPublishedJane Doe v. Robert E. Hampton, Individually and as Chairman, U. S. Civil Service Commission
566 F.2d 265 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 3, 1977
Eck’s opinion clearly established the necessary causal link between the medical conclusion reached in the fitness-for-duty examination and appellant’s disruptive behavior and unsatisfactory job performance. … Sanders, 430 U.S. 99 , 97 S.Ct. 980 , 51 L.Ed.2d 192 (1977), the complaint clearly survives upon the latter. .
Cited 144 timesPublishedRailway Labor Executives' Association v. United States Railroad Retirement Board
749 F.2d 856 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 5, 1984
Clearly, what is at issue here is the interplay between the exception to coverage provisions of the RRA and RUIA and Canadian law. … It is well established that an agency's construction of its own governing statutes is entitled to considerable deference. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v.
Cited 57 timesPublishedPublic Citizen v. National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods
886 F.2d 419 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 26, 1989
Clearly, “some” representation cannot mean “direct” representation'; even the National Anti-Hunger court recognized that section 5 of the FACA “confers no cognizable personal right to an advisory committee appointment” on … would have to determine which organizations or individuals qualified as bona fide “consumer representatives.”
Cited 31 timesPublished317 F. Supp. 3d 370 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 12, 2018
Under the "public-domain doctrine, materials normally immunized from disclosure under FOIA lose their protective cloak once disclosed and preserved in a permanent public record." Cottone v. … They are clearly privileged.
Cited 11 timesPublishedAir Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Civil Aeronautics Board
667 F.2d 181 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 30, 1981
BACKGROUND The Federal Aviation Act of 1958 established a bifurcated regulatory scheme for the air transportation industry. … The CAB’s notice of proposed rulemaking regarding data reporting requirements for fitness determinations, 45 Fed.Reg. 42593 (1980), makes clear that the Board does not ignore safety-related issues which it is qualified to
Cited 1 timesPublished390 F. Supp. 3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 17, 2019
a breach of duty without the testimony of a witness "who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education," see Fed. … Supp. 2d at 45 ("When expert testimony is necessary to establish the standard of care, a plaintiff's failure to name an expert constitutes grounds for dismissal."). B. Plaintiff cannot establish causation.
Cited 14 timesPublished375 F. Supp. 3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 20, 2019
Engineering's allegations about United Sheet Metal's work," "establishes the amount of U.S. … Engineering's notice was clearly untimely. This finding is in accord with Sheet Metal Workers' Local Union No. 100 Washington, D.C. Area Pension Fund v. Western Surety Co. , 187 F.Supp.3d 569 (D.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMasters Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Drug Enforcement Administration
861 F.3d 206 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 2017
More fundamentally, the key question in this case is not whether held orders qualified as “suspicious” under Masters’ policies; the question is whether they qualified as “suspicious” under 21 C.F.R. § 1301.74(b). … The Administrator determined that the ALJ should not have excluded that evidence; as he explained, “[n]othing in the [Settlement Agreement] provided [Masters] with immunity for potential violations [of the Controlled Substances
Cited 21 timesPublishedKaspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Secretary of Labor
268 F.3d 1123 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 2001
The OSHA recordkeeping regulations re- quire an employer to: (1) maintain in each establishment a log and summary of all recordable occupational injuries and illnesses for that establishment; and (2) enter … Kaspar Wire did not argue either to the Commission or to the court that its first aid log qualified as an "equivalent" to OSHA form No. 200.
Cited 18 timesPublishedGreen v. Federal Communications Commission
447 F.2d 323 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 18, 1971
While we observe that the three network licensees in the Washington area all invited petitioner Green to appear in one program format or another, clearly under the FCC fairness doctrine the licensees were not obligated to … The Commission’s general approach to this facet of the fairness doctrine is set forth in a 1964 ruling, Letter to Mid-Florida Television Corporation, 40 F.C.C. 620 , 621 (1964) : * * * The Commission does not seek to establish
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna