Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscadc

6,967 results

0.39s

  • Garnett v. Zeilinger

    323 F. Supp. 3d 58 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 23, 2018

    Gaines have established standing at this juncture as to Claim 2. 9 3. … And as in Wilder , the provisions at issue are clearly intended to benefit the recipients as individuals.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • DL v. Dist. of Columbia, Corp.

    924 F.3d 585 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 21, 2019

    The parties and the district court agree that this case qualifies as “complex federal litigation.” DL, 267 F. Supp. 3d at 69. … Rule 52(a) provides that “[f]indings of fact, whether based on oral or other evidence, must not be set aside unless clearly erroneous . . . .”

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Dole

    919 F.2d 753 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 27, 1990

    However, the amendments also allow state agencies to waive recovery of nonfault overpayments according to guidelines established by the Secretary. 19 U.S.C. § 2315 (a)(1). … Under Chevron’s familiar two-part test, we first look to see if Congress had a clearly discernible intent on the precise *85 question at issue. If so, then that intention must be given effect.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gerald Brent Fagan v. National Cash Register Company

    481 F.2d 1115 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 21, 1973

    Phillips Petroleum Company, 447 F.2d 159 , where women were excluded from achieving seniority rights which were awarded to males, and where, indeed, this otherwise qualified plaintiff-appellant was laid off and her job was … Congress sought to establish equal occupational opportunities, an equal right to available employment, equal pay for equal work and equal working conditions.

    Cited 63 timesPublished
  • Allied Aviation Service Co. of New Jersey v. National Labor Relations Board

    854 F.3d 55 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 18, 2017

    An ALJ then heard an additional day of testimony and accepted post- hearing briefing on whether the Training Supervisors qualified as statutory supervisors. … But we need not decide whether Allied forfeited its bid for the NLRB to dismiss this case in 11 order that it might be reheard before the NMB because the record clearly supports the NLRB’s exercise

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • The Diplomat Lakewood Incorporated, an Ohio Corporation v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary, U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare

    613 F.2d 1009 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 16, 1979

    Approximately one-fourth of Diplomat’s patients require this high degree of care and otherwise qualify for Medicare benefits. … The qualifying age for Medicare benefits is 65, except in a few circumstances not relevant here. 42 U.S.C. § 1395c (1976). 2 .

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • Dorcas J. Daniels-Lumley v. United States of America

    306 F.2d 769 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1962

    Accordingly, unless plaintiff’s injuries were clearly not compensable under the F. E. C. A. … A Bureau of Employees’ Compensation and an Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board had been established under the Act by Order 58 of the Federal Security Agency of July 16, 1946, 11 Fed. Beg. 7943.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Campbell v. United States Department of Justice

    164 F.3d 20 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 29, 1998

    One way to discharge this burden is to submit a declaration from an appropriately qualified official attesting to the basis for the agency's deci- sion. … First, death clearly matters, as the deceased by definition cannot personally suffer the privacy-related injuries that may plague the living.

    Cited 728 timesPublished
  • United States v. Dale

    991 F.2d 819 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 6, 1993

    That multiple representation, Sweeney asserts, precluded Kotelly from advising Sweeney to seek immunity from the government in exchange for testimony against his co-defendants. … In their Memorandum Concerning the Non-Applicability of the Sentencing Guidelines, the defendants argued to the district court that, “the general verdicts of guilty on Count One clearly do not establish that defendants participated

    Cited 168 timesPublished
  • Northpoint Technology, Ltd. v. Federal Communications Commission, Echostar Satellite Corporation, Intervenors

    414 F.3d 61 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 15, 2005

    Instead, it simply shifts the burden for avoiding harmful interference in those instances from the MVDDS providers to the DBS providers-something that is clearly not barred by the RLBSA. … The FCC has promulgated various regulations governing the processing of such applications and establishing certain filing deadlines.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Jane Doe v. Robert E. Hampton, Individually and as Chairman, U. S. Civil Service Commission

    566 F.2d 265 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 3, 1977

    Eck’s opinion clearly established the necessary causal link between the medical conclusion reached in the fitness-for-duty examination and appellant’s disruptive behavior and unsatisfactory job performance. … Sanders, 430 U.S. 99 , 97 S.Ct. 980 , 51 L.Ed.2d 192 (1977), the complaint clearly survives upon the latter. .

    Cited 144 timesPublished
  • United States v. Richard Kelly

    748 F.2d 691 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 16, 1984

    Second, he contends the district court should have acquitted him on the ground that the evidence refuted predisposition and established entrapment as a matter of law. … If that were so, bribe-takers could immunize themselves from prosecution by the artifice of always vigorously refusing the initial offer.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Rca Global Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

    758 F.2d 722 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 5, 1985

    Nor can the FCC seriously rely on note 14 of the Prescription Order 15 for evidence that it clearly validated a tariff substantively identical to the one at issue in this case. … However, the Commission's simultaneous denial of RCA's complaint, which was premised on arguments identical to those raised in the petition to reject, is clearly reviewable.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jones, Mabel S. v. Prince George Cty

    348 F.3d 1014 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 14, 2003

    Nina clearly suffers from an injury that the Prince George’s County defendants allegedly caused and that the requested relief would redress: the shooting deprived Nina of her father’s financial and emotional support, the … Although an existing party who is ineffectual, incompetent, or unwilling to raise claims or arguments that would benefit the putative intervenor may qualify as an inadequate representative in some cases, this is not such

    Cited 67 timesPublished
  • United States v. Olabimpe Olejiya

    754 F.3d 986 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 10, 2014

    We assume without deciding that Akinadewo merely forfeited the issue because we conclude that he cannot establish plain error. See Tann, 532 F.3d at 872. … Franklin about the quantity of PCP on the street” to establish conspiracy’s entire amount was foreseeable by, and therefore attributable to, defendant).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • J.G.G. v. Donald Trump

    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 8, 2025

    And on the dispositive interpretive question addressed above, the TRO seems to me clearly ambiguous, which makes the imposition of criminal contempt clearly inappropriate. … Nonetheless, the district court denied Peru’s request to dismiss the suit on immunity grounds. Id.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    859 F.2d 156 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 20, 1988

    ICC, 725 F.2d 716 , 726 (D.C.Cir.1984), will qualify as hardship. In Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. … The agency’s position is clearly final.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • International Broth. of Teamsters v. Pena

    17 F.3d 1478 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 15, 1994

    The first seems clearly ruled out by common sense and the presumption in favor of reviewability. See Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 410 , 91 S.Ct. 814, 820 , 28 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971). … The petitioner seeks to satisfy this requirement by arguing that the FHWA's action unleashes Mexican drivers on American roads even though they would not qualify for American CDLs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • American Maritime Association v. United States of America Aeron Marine Shipping Company, American Maritime Association Phoenix Bulkship I, Inc. v. United States of America American Maritime Association, Phoenix Bulkship I, Inc. v. United States of America

    766 F.2d 545 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 2, 1985

    Instead, the section provides that all ship purchasers who qualify may buy ships which are eligible for CDS payments. … Congress clearly expected MarAd to extend CDS as well as ODS to qualified bulk carriers under the 1970 amendments.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Holy Spirit Association for the Unification of World Christianity v. Central Intelligence Agency and Stansfield Turner

    636 F.2d 838 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 2, 1981

    Id. at 5, JA at 117. 7 We reverse the court’s ruling that any of these fifteen records qualified as congressional records. … Personnel and similar files whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy are protected by exemption 6, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (b)(6). 14 .

    Vacated in part, on other grounds by Central Intelligence Agency v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for the Unification of World Christianity, 455 U.S. 997 (1982)Cited 35 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.