Case law

Wilson v. United States

198 F.2d 299 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 10, 1952

In Brown v. … The wording of the statute has been slightly changed since the Brown opinion was written, but the principle remains the same.

Food Store Employees Union, Local 347, Amalgamated Meat Cutters And Butcher Workmen Of North America, Aflcio v. National Labor Relations Board

422 F.2d 685 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 3, 1969

In exercising this judgment the Board owed no deference to its trial examiner. Cf. Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 494-496 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers v. … Workers v. NLRB, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 383 , 389, 298 F. 2d 297 , 303 (1961) cert. denied, Gulf Bottlers Inc. v. NLRB, 369 U.S. 843 , 82 S.Ct. 875 , 7 L.Ed.2d 847 , (1962); see also NLRB v.

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

533 F.3d 820 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 22, 2008

Co. v. FERC, 295 F.3d 1, 10 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Comm’n v. FERC, 522 F.3d 378, 398 (D.C. Cir. 2008).

Absolute Healthcare v. NLRB

103 F.4th 61 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 31, 2024

Corp. v. NLRB, 379 U.S. 203, 216 (1954). … We therefore vacate the portion of the Board’s decision ordering those remedies. See Bozzuto’s Inc. v.

United Furniture Workers of America, Afl-Cio and Local 270, United Furniture Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

336 F.2d 738 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 12, 1964

Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). … See Local Union 219, Retail Clerks International Association, AFL-CIO v. N. L. R. B., 105 U.S.App.D.C. 232 , 265 F.2d 814 (1959). Compare Procter & Gamble Independent Union of Port Ivory, N. Y. v. Procter & Gamble Mfg.

Stern Produce Company, Inc. v. NLRB

97 F.4th 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 26, 2024

That cannot sustain the Board’s finding. See Beverly Cal. Corp. v. NLRB, 227 F.3d 817, 835 (7th Cir. 2000). … In particular, the Board has held that an employer may not discipline an employee because of “anti-union animus.” NLRB v. Transp. Mgmt.

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio, and Local 134, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Bell Supervisors Protective Association (Not a Labor Organization) v. National Labor Relations Board

487 F.2d 1113 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 22, 1972

B. v. … See, e. g., Dallas Mailers Union, Local 143 v. NLRB, 144 U.S.App.D.C. 254 , 445 F.2d 730 (1971) 5 The Board won judicial approval of the Oakland Mailers doctrine in Dallas Mailers Union, Local No. 143 v.

National Automobile Dealers Ass'n v. Federal Trade Commission

670 F.3d 268 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 2012

Before: ROGERS, GARLAND, and BROWN, Circuit Judges.  2 Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND. … To implement this change, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System promulgated amendments to their respective risk-based pricing rules on July 15, 2011.

In re Buckingham Super Markets, Inc.

631 F.2d 763 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 15, 1980

Chipser v. Kohimeyer & Co., 600 F.2d 1061, 1063 (5th Cir. 1979); Wansor v. … Co., 539 F.2d 1107, 1108-09 (7th Cir. 1976); Babich v. Clower, 528 F.2d 293, 294-96 (4th Cir. 1975). . See Wansor v. George Hantscho Co., 570 F.2d at 1207 ; Spound v.

Local 814, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen v. National Labor Relations Board, Karl J. Leib, Jr., Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Santini Brothers, Inc.

512 F.2d 564 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 30, 1975

Because the Board has not explained its reasons for reaching different results, 6 see Greater Boston Television Corp. v. F. C. … If the Board finds the two indistinguishable, it should so inform the court. See N. L. R. B. v.

Farmer v. United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America

211 F.2d 36 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 4, 1953

Corp. v. United States, 12 Columbia Broadcasting System v. United States, 13 and Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. … American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations Board, 1940, 308 U.S. 401, 412 , 60 S.Ct 300 , 84 L.Ed. 347 ; and Inland Empire District Council v.

Application of Stephens-Adamson Mfg. Co.

262 F. 635 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 5, 1920

And the following words have been upheld: “Holeproof,” as applied to hosiery (Holeproof Hosiery Co. v. Wallach Bros., 172 Fed. 859 , 97 C. C. A. 263 ); “Cream,” as applied to rolled oats (Albers Bros. Milling Co. v. … C.] 26 Fed. 576 ); and many others, equally suggestive, referred to in 'the last case, where the opinion is by Judge Brown, afterwards Mr. Justice Brown of the Supreme Court of the United States.

The American Bottling Company v. NLRB

992 F.3d 1129 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 13, 2021

Cir. 1987) (quoting NLRB v. A.J. Tower Co., 329 U.S. 324, 330 (1946)). Board determinations regarding such matters are therefore “rarely to be disturbed,” South Prairie Constr. Co. v. … Ctr. v. NLRB, 833 F.3d 202, 206 (D.C.

Wood Ex Rel. United States v. American Institute in Taiwan

286 F.3d 526 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 16, 2002

Arguing that Congress intended the clause to apply to the Institute, Wood points to Sloan Shipyards v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., 258 U.S. 549 (1922). … See, e.g., Brown v. INS, 775 F.2d 383, 388 (D.C. Cir. 1985).

Williams v. Wilkie

320 F. Supp. 3d 191 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 13, 2018

Browning v. Clinton , 292 F.3d 235 , 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). I. Subject Matter Jurisdiction Under Rule 12(b)(1), the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence. See Lujan v. … Fermin v.

Temple University Hospital v. NLRB

39 F.4th 743 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 8, 2022

Ass’n v. NLRB, 499 U.S. 606, 608, 615–17 (1991). … Hammontree v. NLRB, 925 F.2d 1486, 1491–92 (D.C.

St NE Dept Hlth v. Dept Hlth Human Svc

435 F.3d 326 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 27, 2006

Bruning, Attorney General, Attorney General’s Office of State of Nebraska.  2 Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and GARLAND and BROWN, Circuit Judges. … Aviation Consumer Action Project v. Washburn, 535 F.2d 101, 108 (D.C. Cir. 1976); see also Va. Soc’y for Human Life, Inc. v.

George W. Sohm v. Henry H. Fowler, Secretary of the Treasury

365 F.2d 915 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 16, 1966

See, e. g., Schwartz v. Covington, 341 F.2d 537 (9th Cir. 1965) ; Reed v. Franke, 297 F.2d 17, 26-27 (4th Cir. 1961) ; Marshall v. Wyman, 132 F.Supp. 169, 176 (N.D.Calif.1955) ; Hiett v. … See, e. g., Federal Maritime Board v. Isbrandtsen Co., 356 U.S. 481 , 78 S.Ct. 851 , 2 L.Ed.2d 926 (1958) ; United States v. Western Pac. R.R., 352 U.S. 59 , 77 S.Ct. 161 , 1 L.Ed.2d 126 (1956) ; Far East Conference v.

Massachusetts Fair Share v. Law Enforcement Assistance Administration

776 F.2d 1066 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 15, 1985

Brown , and cases like it, e.g., Miller v. United States, 753 F.2d 270, 273-74 (3d Cir.1985); Cook v. Heckler, 751 F.2d 240, 241 (8th Cir.1984); Von Luetzow v. … Director, Office of Personnel Management, 562 F.Supp. 684, 685-86 (D.D.C.1983), involved so-called “procedural claims,” Brown v.

Lee Memorial Hospital v. Xavier Becerra

10 F.4th 859 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 20, 2021

In Mathews v. … United States v.