Case law

United States v. Michael A. Whren

53 F.3d 371 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 13, 1995

Soto opened the door, dove across Brown and grabbed the other bag from Whren’s left hand. Officer Littlejohn pinned Brown to the back of the driver’s seat so that he could not move. … See United States v.

Elliott v. Harris

24 App. D.C. 11 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 24, 1904

In the case of Wilkes v. … United States v. Bainbridge, 1 Mason, 71 , Fed. Cas. No. 14,497; Wassum v. Feeney, 121 Mass. 93, 95 , 23 Am. Rep. 258 .

Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood, LLC v. NLRB

45 F.4th 234 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 9, 2022

NLRB v. … NLRB v. Transp. Mgmt. Corp., 462 U.S. at 401–02.

National Federation of the Blind v. United States Department of Transportation

827 F.3d 51 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 28, 2016

Air Tour Ass’n v. FAA, 298 F.3d 997, 1012–13 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (same); North Carolina v. … Similarly, in Paralyzed Veterans of America v. Civil Aeronautics Board, we found reasonable grounds for an untimely filing under a predecessor statute to section 46110(a). See 752 F.2d 694, 705 n.82 (D.C.

Meat Cutters Union Local 81 of Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America v. National Labor Relations Board

458 F.2d 794 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 25, 1972

B. v. … It is clear that the Board’s remedial order is within the broad discretion it is permitted under Section 10(c) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160 (c) (1970). See Phelps Dodge Corp. v. N. L. R.

United States ex rel. Just v. Simon

62 F.2d 879 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 3, 1933

Appeal from a judgment in the Supreme Court of the District dismissing a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the board of education to appoint appellant to the position of teacher of English in the colored senior high … No. 11,777; Bardwell v. Purrington, 107 Mass. 419, 425 ), and for that reason ineligible. It is immaterial, therefore, whether the vacancy occurred on March 15 or on July 17,1931.

Swinton v. J. Frank Kelly, Inc.

554 F.2d 1075 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 3, 1976

Section 15 of the amending act replaces the old § 921(b) with the new § 921(b) relating to the Benefits Review Board. . Undeniably, if the District Court lost jurisdiction, we also are without jurisdiction. Bruner v. … O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 508 , 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483, 487 (1951); Cardillo v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., supra note 1. . Mitchell v.

Jack C. Givens, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, Walter A. Wells, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, James L. Robbins, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, Elmer F. Lorman v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, Charles E. Forseth v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

720 F.2d 196 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 1983

GIVENS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent. Walter A. WELLS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Petitioner, v. … LORMAN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent. Charles E. FORSETH, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent. Nos. 82-2183 to 82-2185, 82-2312 and 82-2313.

District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company, Intervenor

353 F.2d 904 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 18, 1965

It is agreed by the parties, and we concur, that if the Board correctly concluded the chief and assistant engineers were supervisors and not employees within the meaning of the Act, its action must be upheld. … We hold there is substantial evidence in the record, considered as a whole, to support the Board’s findings. Affirmed. 1 . 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.

Western Coal Traffic League v. STB

998 F.3d 945 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 28, 2021

In Cargill, Inc. v. BNSF R. … See e.g., Frothingham v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447, 489 (1923); cf. Franklin v.

Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. STB

72 F.4th 297 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 2023

New Jersey v. EPA, 989 F.3d 1038, 1045 (D.C. Cir. 2021) (quoting Summers v. Earth Island Inst., 555 U.S. 488, 499 (2009); Grocery Mfrs. Ass’n v. EPA, 693 F.3d 169, 174 (D.C. Cir. 2012)). … Ass’n v. ICC, 894 F.2d 915, 917 (7th Cir. 1990); United Pac. R.R. Co. v. Ametek, Inc., 104 F.3d 558, 559, 562 (3d Cir. 1997); R.R. Salvage & Restoration, Inc. v. STB, 648 F.3d 915, 917–18 (8th Cir. 2011)).

Swanson Group Mfg. LLC v. Sally Jewell

790 F.3d 235 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 2015

The allowable sale quantity for Roseburg is 45 million board feet; for Medford, 57.1 million board feet. … of the allowable sale quantity, averaging 32 million board feet per year.

Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, City of New Orleans, American Airlines, Inc., and Continental Air Lines, Inc., Intervenors. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., Intervenor. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

684 F.2d 31 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 23, 1982

DELTA AIR LINES, INC., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, American Airlines, Inc., Intervenor. TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. … See, e.g., Nat'l Courier Ass'n v. Board of Governors of FRS, 516 F.2d 1229, 1242 (D.C.Cir.1975); Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Train, 491 F.2d 63, 64, 68, 69 (D.C.Cir.1974).

Julie Beberman v. Antony Blinken

61 F.4th 978 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 7, 2023

Chafin v. Chafin, 568 U.S. 165, 172 (2013) (cleaned up). Here, this court can do nothing to remedy the Board’s failure to give interim relief. … Interim relief is a stop-gap measure that preserves the status quo while the Board considers a grievance. It has no place where, as here, the Board has reached a final decision. See Aragon v. Tillerson, 240 F.

Roy E. Bowden v. United States

106 F.3d 433 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 18, 1997

Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1967-68 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976); Bayer v. United States Dept. of the Treasury, 956 F.2d 330, 332 (D.C.Cir.1992). … As in Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d at 18 , for a combination of equitable considerations, we think the INS waived this defense.

Harold R. Mitchell v. United States

293 F.2d 161 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 19, 1961

v. … Belton v. United States, 1958, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 81 , 259 F.2d 811 . . Cf. Turner v.

Carl D. Pettyjohn v. United States

419 F.2d 651 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 19, 1969

In McNabb v. … Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); Bailey v. United States, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 354 , 389 F. 2d 305 (1967). . Miranda v.

John Doe v. Donald Rumsfeld

683 F.3d 390 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 15, 2012

Katz was on the brief for amicus curiae Project on Government Oversight in support of appellee John Doe.  2 Before: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, BROWN and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges. … In December 2005, the Detainee Status Board held a hearing and deemed Doe a threat to the Multi-National Forces in Iraq.

Kreis v. Secretary of the Air Force

406 F.3d 684 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 6, 2005

Ass’n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 (1983) (quoting Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States, 371 U.S. 156, 168 (1962)). … Kreis points to Board precedent that treated as evidence, not arguments, expert opinion refuting Board judgments and reasoning. See also Guy v. United States, 608 F.2d 867, 874 (Ct. Cl. 1979).

Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc v. NLRB

128 F.4th 1288 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 18, 2025

LLC v. NLRB, 107 F.4th 994, 1000 (D.C. Cir. 2024) (citations omitted). As the Supreme Court noted in Allentown Mack Sales & Serv., Inc. v. … See Tramont Mfg., LLC v. NLRB, 890 F.3d 1114, 1121 (D.C.