Case law

Hayne v. McIntire

7 App. D.C. 449 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 1896

Justice Shepard delivered the opinion of the Court: This is the last of the cases argued and submitted together with No. 465, Pryor v. McIntire, ante, p. 417. … The evidence with respect to the sale is substantially the same as that commented on in the preceding case of Brown v. McIntire, with the exception of the single advertisement referred to-above.

Sign and Pictorial Union Local 1175, Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators and Paperhangers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

419 F.2d 726 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 23, 1969

Recognizing that where unilateral wage action of this kind is shown the inferences to be drawn from the evidence must be left to the Board, N.L.R.B. v. … B. v.

Matthew Palmieri v. United States

896 F.3d 579 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 24, 2018

On the other hand, Webster v. … We recently reserved that question, see Gill v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 875 F.3d 677, 682 (D.C. Cir. 2017), as has the Ninth Circuit, see Dorfmont v. Brown, 913 F.2d 1399, 1403–04 (9th Cir. 1990).

Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. National Labor Relations Board

238 F.2d 38 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 25, 1956

In effectuating the policies of the Act the Board has a discretion not to exert jurisdiction to the limit of its power. National Labor Relations Board v. … The order of the Board will be set aside and the ease remanded to the Board for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. .

Independent Producers Group v. Library of Congress

759 F.3d 100 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 25, 2014

Before: ROGERS, BROWN and MILLETT, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MILLETT. … Cir. 1985) (“the Library [of Congress] is not an agency under the Administrative Procedure Act”), with Intercollegiate Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Board, 684 F.3d 1332, 1341-1342 (D.C.

Local 174, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace And Agricultural Implement Workers Of America (Uaw) v. National Labor Relations Board

645 F.2d 1151 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 1981

III. 8 Our inquiry is guided by Eastex, Inc. v. … Republic Aviation Corp. v.

Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. United States Navy

697 F.3d 1171 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 2012

Fowler v. … Id. at 125; see also United Christian Scientists v. Christian Science Board of Directors, 829 F.2d 1152, 1170–71 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

Hoover H. Wright v. Eugene C. Paine, Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior v. Eugene C. Paine

289 F.2d 766 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 23, 1961

Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co., 1945, 325 U.S. 410, 414 , 65 S.Ct. 1215, 1217 , 89 L.Ed. 1700 . The “courts can intervene only where legal rights are invaded or the law violated.” Chapman v. … Wright v. Seaton, Misc. 1403. 3 .

Allina Health Services v. Thomas Price

863 F.3d 937 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 25, 2017

See Northeast Hospital Corp. v. Sebelius, 657 F.3d 1, 15 (D.C. Cir. 2011). … See, e.g., Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. Leavitt, 509 F.3d 1259, 1271 n.11 (10th Cir. 2007); Baptist Health v. Thompson, 458 F.3d 768, 776 n.9 (8th Cir. 2006); Omni Manor Nursing Home v.

St. Agnes Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board, District 1199c, National Union of Hospital and Health Care Employees, Afl-Cio, Intervenors

871 F.2d 137 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 28, 1989

Pedro’s, Inc. v. NLRB, 652 F.2d 1005, 1011 (D.C.Cir.1981). In NLRB v. … See also NLRB v.

United States v. Eddie M. Harrison

419 F.2d 691 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 8, 1969

Harrison v. United States, No. 16,391 (D.C.Cir. June 12, 1962). … Johnson v. United States, No. 21,851 (D. C. Cir. June 20, 1969); citing Thompson v. United States, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 39 , 405 F.2d 1106 (1968); Crawford *695 v.

National Federation of the Blind v. United States Department of Transportation

827 F.3d 51 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 28, 2016

Air Tour Ass’n v. FAA, 298 F.3d 997, 1012–13 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (same); North Carolina v. … Similarly, in Paralyzed Veterans of America v. Civil Aeronautics Board, we found reasonable grounds for an untimely filing under a predecessor statute to section 46110(a). See 752 F.2d 694, 705 n.82 (D.C.

Communications Workers of America v. NLRB

994 F.3d 653 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 16, 2021

In NLRB v. … Napleton 1050, Inc. v. NLRB, 976 F.3d 30, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2020) (quoting Constellium Rolled Prods. Ravenswood, LLC v. NLRB, 945 F.3d 546, 550 (D.C. Cir. 2019)); accord NLRB v. Peninsula Gen. Hosp. Med.

Gill v. Gill

147 F.2d 154 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 31, 1945

Oklahoma v. Texas, 256 U.S. 70, 86, 88 , 41 S.Ct. 420 , 65 L.Ed. 831 . Shellman v, Shellman, 68 App.D.C. 197 , 95 F.2d 108 . Brown v. Brown, 74 App.D.C. 309, 311 , 122 F.2d 219, 221 . Melvin v. … Brown v. Brown, 74 App.D.C. 309, 310 , 122 F.2d 219, 220 ; Geracy, Inc. v. Hoover, 77 U.S.App. 55, 58, 133 F.2d 25, 28 ; see Spruill v. Serven, 68 App.

American Express Co. v. O'Connor

279 F. 997 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 3, 1922

Sheets indicating the names of the consignees of the goods which Brown was to deliver and the amount to be paid by each consignee were placed in Brown’s hands by the Express Company’s employés. … Hartell v. Simonson & Son Co., 213 N. Y. 345, 349, 350 , 113 N. E. 255, 256 .

Eric Flannery v. Mark Eckenwiler

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 4, 2026

FLANNERY AND DRANE FLANNERY RESTAURANT, LLC, TRADING AS BIG BOARD, APPELLANTS v. … As the Court put it in Clark v.

Oscar H. Mendoza v. National Labor Relations Board

948 F.2d 781 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 2, 1991

MENDOZA, et al., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 90-1589. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Oct. 2, 1991. Before BUCKLEY, D.H. … Substantially for the reasons appearing in the Board's decision, we agree with the Board's interpretation of the contract.

Helvering v. Insular Sugar Refining Corp.

141 F.2d 713 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 27, 1944

Co. v. Davis, 301 U.S. 337, 356 , 57 S.Ct. 816, 825 , 81 L.Ed. 1142 . Cf. Williams v. United States, 99 Ct. Cl. 203 , 48 F.Supp. 647 . Cf. Vennell v. … Board findings 18, 22.

Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Intl. Dev. Finance Corp

77 F.4th 679 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 7, 2023

It determined that Symons v. Chrysler Corporation Loan Guarantee Board, 670 F.2d 238 (D.C. Cir. 1981), was controlling. … SW Gen., Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 796 F.3d 67, 74 n.4 (D.C.

District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company, Intervenor

353 F.2d 904 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 18, 1965

It is agreed by the parties, and we concur, that if the Board correctly concluded the chief and assistant engineers were supervisors and not employees within the meaning of the Act, its action must be upheld. … We hold there is substantial evidence in the record, considered as a whole, to support the Board’s findings. Affirmed. 1 . 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.