Case law

Robert Scott, Jr., and Robert C. Konop v. National Transportation Safety Board, Secretary of Transportation and Federal Aviation Administration

114 F.3d 305 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 13, 1997

See also MacDonald Miller Co. v. NLRB, 856 F.2d 1423, 1425 (9th Cir.1988) (petition for review filed “well over thirty days” after issuance of agency decision was untimely); Western Newspaper Publishing Co. v. … Board issues a decision.

Ahmed Salem Bin Ali Jaber v. United States

861 F.3d 241 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 2017

Eb-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Co. v. United States, 607 F.3d 836 (D.C. … Presidents are slow to appoint members to these boards; their operations are shrouded in secrecy; and it often seems the boards are more interested in protecting and excusing the actions of agencies than holding them accountable

Allina Health Services v. Thomas Price

863 F.3d 937 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 25, 2017

See Northeast Hospital Corp. v. Sebelius, 657 F.3d 1, 15 (D.C. Cir. 2011). … See, e.g., Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. Leavitt, 509 F.3d 1259, 1271 n.11 (10th Cir. 2007); Baptist Health v. Thompson, 458 F.3d 768, 776 n.9 (8th Cir. 2006); Omni Manor Nursing Home v.

An opinion was released in case 22-7117, Michelle Florio v. Gallaudet University

119 F.4th 67 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 4, 2024

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 247 (D.C. Cir. 2002). The district court held that “the challenged statements are about Gallaudet’s Kappa Gamma chapter as a whole, not about any one member.” Florio, 619 F. … Browning, 292 F.3d at 247. Florio alleges that he was incorrectly identified as appearing in the photograph.

Carpet, Linoleum, Soft Tile And Resilient Floor Covering Layers, Local Union No. 419, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

429 F.2d 747 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 1970

National Woodwork Manufacturers v. … Workers, Local 501 v.

Genoa M. White v. United States

780 F.2d 97 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 3, 1986

Brown in which he harmed his wife with a gun. Although Dr. Brown and Dwayne White discussed this fantasy on several occasions, Dr. Brown never disclosed the fantasy to the Hospital administrators or to Genoa White. … Brown about the fantasy. The duty to warn foreseeable victims of mental patients originated in Tarasoff v.

Jack C. Givens, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, Walter A. Wells, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, James L. Robbins, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, Elmer F. Lorman v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, Charles E. Forseth v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

720 F.2d 196 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 1983

GIVENS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent. Walter A. WELLS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Petitioner, v. … LORMAN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent. Charles E. FORSETH, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent. Nos. 82-2183 to 82-2185, 82-2312 and 82-2313.

Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America, Afl-Cio, and Food Handlers Local 425 v. National Labor Relations Board

420 F.2d 148 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 2, 1969

The Trial Examiner found from conflicting testimony that the increase was consented to by a union official having apparent authority to do so; and the Board adopted this finding. 1 *149 The Board also ruled that a claim of … On the evidence making up the record before the Board, we see no occasion to disturb the Board’s resolution of these issues and its dismissal of the complaint.

Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local 901, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Union De Trabajadores De La Gonzalez Chemical Industries, Inc.,(independiente)

293 F.2d 881 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 29, 1961

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. UNION DE TRABAJADORES DE LA GONZALEZ CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.,(INDEPENDIENTE), Respondent. Nos. 16030, 16079. … -C.I.O. v.

Leo G. Kohls v. National Labor Relations Board, and United Parcel Service, Intervenor. United Parcel Service v. National Labor Relations Board, and Leo G. Kohls, Intervenor

629 F.2d 173 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 25, 1980

KOHLS, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and United Parcel Service, Intervenor. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and Leo G. Kohls, Intervenor. … Arnold Co. v.

Hayne v. McIntire

7 App. D.C. 449 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 1896

Justice Shepard delivered the opinion of the Court: This is the last of the cases argued and submitted together with No. 465, Pryor v. McIntire, ante, p. 417. … The evidence with respect to the sale is substantially the same as that commented on in the preceding case of Brown v. McIntire, with the exception of the single advertisement referred to-above.

Sign and Pictorial Union Local 1175, Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators and Paperhangers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

419 F.2d 726 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 23, 1969

Recognizing that where unilateral wage action of this kind is shown the inferences to be drawn from the evidence must be left to the Board, N.L.R.B. v. … B. v.

Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. National Labor Relations Board

238 F.2d 38 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 25, 1956

In effectuating the policies of the Act the Board has a discretion not to exert jurisdiction to the limit of its power. National Labor Relations Board v. … The order of the Board will be set aside and the ease remanded to the Board for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. .

Wolfgang Baenitz and Chemische Werke Witten v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of Patents

363 F.2d 969 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 1966

See, e. g.; Brown v. Piper, 91 U.S. 37 , 42, 23 L.Ed. 200 (1875); Friend v. Burnham & Morrill Co., 55 F.2d 150, 151 (1st Cir. 1932). See also Dwinell-Wright Co. v. … Stieg v. Commissioner of Patents, Nov. 18, 1965. And see Standard Oil Development Co. v. Marzall, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 210, 214 , 181 F.2d 280, 284 (1950); cf. L-O-F Glass Fibers Company v.

Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood, LLC v. NLRB

45 F.4th 234 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 9, 2022

NLRB v. … NLRB v. Transp. Mgmt. Corp., 462 U.S. at 401–02.

St. Agnes Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board, District 1199c, National Union of Hospital and Health Care Employees, Afl-Cio, Intervenors

871 F.2d 137 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 28, 1989

Pedro’s, Inc. v. NLRB, 652 F.2d 1005, 1011 (D.C.Cir.1981). In NLRB v. … See also NLRB v.

United States v. Eddie M. Harrison

419 F.2d 691 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 8, 1969

Harrison v. United States, No. 16,391 (D.C.Cir. June 12, 1962). … Johnson v. United States, No. 21,851 (D. C. Cir. June 20, 1969); citing Thompson v. United States, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 39 , 405 F.2d 1106 (1968); Crawford *695 v.

National Federation of the Blind v. United States Department of Transportation

827 F.3d 51 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 28, 2016

Air Tour Ass’n v. FAA, 298 F.3d 997, 1012–13 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (same); North Carolina v. … Similarly, in Paralyzed Veterans of America v. Civil Aeronautics Board, we found reasonable grounds for an untimely filing under a predecessor statute to section 46110(a). See 752 F.2d 694, 705 n.82 (D.C.

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

581 F.2d 941 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 1978

Kessler & Co. v. EEOC, 472 F.2d 1147 (5th Cir.) … See Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. EEOC, 435 F.Supp. 751 (D.D.C.1977).

Gill v. Gill

147 F.2d 154 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 31, 1945

Oklahoma v. Texas, 256 U.S. 70, 86, 88 , 41 S.Ct. 420 , 65 L.Ed. 831 . Shellman v, Shellman, 68 App.D.C. 197 , 95 F.2d 108 . Brown v. Brown, 74 App.D.C. 309, 311 , 122 F.2d 219, 221 . Melvin v. … Brown v. Brown, 74 App.D.C. 309, 310 , 122 F.2d 219, 220 ; Geracy, Inc. v. Hoover, 77 U.S.App. 55, 58, 133 F.2d 25, 28 ; see Spruill v. Serven, 68 App.