Case law

Larry Klayman v. Barack Obama

800 F.3d 559 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 28, 2015

BROWN, Circuit Judge: I disagree with the district court’s conclusion that plaintiffs have established a “substantial likelihood of success on the merits.” See, e.g., Sottera, Inc. v. … ACLU v.

Saturn Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Dan-Air Services Ltd., Intervenors. Lynn Michelle Tschirhart and Paul Jeffrey Tschirhart v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Americans for Charter Travel Capitol International Airways, Inc., Intervenor. National Air Carrier Association, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Dan-Air Services Ltd., Intervenors. Aviation Consumer Action Project v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Capitol International Airways, Inc., Intervenor. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Lynn M. Tschirhart, Intervenors. Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, National Air Carrier Association, Inc., Intervenors. American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, National Air Carrier Association, Inc., Intervenors

476 F.2d 907 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 9, 1973

NATIONAL AIR CARRIER ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Dan-Air Services Ltd. et al., Intervenors. AVIATION CONSUMER ACTION PROJECT, Petitioners, v. … PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, National Air Carrier Association, Inc., et al., Intervenors. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., Petitioner, v.

Jane Doe v. United States Department of Justice

753 F.2d 1092 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 1, 1985

In Board of Regents v. … See Brown v. United States, 742 F.2d 1498, 1504-07 (D.C.Cir.1984) (en banc).

Franklin, Robert v. DC

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 29, 1998

Taylor v. Board of Educ., 288 F.2d 600, 602 (2d Cir. 1961) (Friendly, J.). The antitrust case of Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294 (1962), does not, as the prisoners suppose, alter this analysis. … See Brown Shoe Co., 370 U.S. at 308.

Cameroon Whiteru v. WMATA

25 F.4th 1053 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 11, 2022

Area Transit Auth. v. … We also reject WMATA’s reliance on the decisions in Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Cross, Andrews v. Wilkins, and Fells v.

Longmont United Hospital v. NLRB

70 F.4th 573 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 13, 2023

“We will uphold the Board’s decisions if they are not arbitrary, capricious, or grounded in legal error, and if substantial evidence supports the Board’s factual findings.” RadNet Mgmt., Inc. v. … Freightways v. NLRB, 669 F.2d 790, 794 (D.C. Cir. 1981)). 2 See NLRB v.

Joseph C. Steffan v. William J. Perry, Secretary of Defense

41 F.3d 677 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 22, 1994

Goldman v. Weinberger, 475 U.S. 503, 507-09 , 106 S.Ct. 1310, 1313-14 , 89 L.Ed.2d 478 (1986); Brown v. Glines, 444 U.S. 348, 354 , 100 S.Ct. 594, 599 , 62 L.Ed.2d 540 (1980) (iquoting Parker v. … Noto v.

Gordon v. Thomas

70 F.2d 752 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 2, 1934

Brown. … Railroad Co. v. United States, 108 U. S. 277 , 2 S. Ct. 627 , 27 L. Ed. 724 ; Mills v. Scott, 99 U. S. 25 , 25 L. Ed. 294 ; Washington & G. Railroad Co. v. Car Company, 5 App. D. C. 550; McReynolds v.

United States v. Tyrone Vincent Short

570 F.2d 1051 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 3, 1978

See, e. g., Gerstein v. … Upon examination of the same picture, this court would label the jacket “reddish brown.” Regardless, Officer Carter obviously was looking for individuals with a jacket of any arguable shade of brown.

Abraham Williams v. United States

403 F.2d 176 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 30, 1968

Appellant and Miss Brown then drove to the market. A few minutes later, Edwards approached appellant in front of the market while Miss Brown shopped inside. … He relies largely upon Gordon v. United States, 344 U.S. 414 , 73 S.Ct. 369 , 97 L.Ed. 447 (1953).

Edward Ford, Jr. v. Charles Massarone

902 F.3d 309 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 4, 2018

Board of Parole was abolished, the U.S. Parole Commission has conducted parole proceedings for both D.C. and federal offenders. See Daniel v. Fulwood, 766 F.3d 57, 59 (D.C. Cir. 2014). … Ford v. Attorney General, No. 02-302 (D. Colo. Apr. 9, 2004). Res judicata, however, is an “affirmative defense” that “must [be] plead[ed] . . . in the answer to the complaint.” Brown v.

Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Fleming International Airways, Inc., Intervenor. Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Federal Express Corporation, Intervenor. Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Pacific Alaska Airlines, Inc., Intervenor

667 F.2d 181 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 30, 1981

667 F.2d 181 215 U.S.App.D.C. 138 AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL, Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Fleming International Airways, Inc., Intervenor. … AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL, Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Federal Express Corporation, Intervenor. AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL, Petitioner, v.

Federal Trade Commission v. Donald P. Carter, Post-Keys-Gardner, Inc., Anthony C. Chevins, Cunningham & Walsh, Inc., Paul R. Dooling, William Esty Co., Inc., Clifford Fitzgerald, Dancer-Fitzgerald-Sample, Inc., Charles Hamm, F. William Free & Co., Inc., Robert K. Heimann, American Brands, Inc., William D. Hobbs, R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Robert E. Jacoby, Ted Bates & Co., Inc., Don Johnston, J. Walter Thompson Co., James Jordan, Batten, Barton, Durstine & Osbourn, Inc., Curtis H. Judge, Loew's Theatres, Inc., Stanley H. Katz, Lkp International, Ltd. D/B/A Leber Katz Partners, Leo-Arthur Kelmonson, Kenyon & Eckhardt Advertising, Inc., John Kinsella, Leo Burnett Co., Inc., C. I. McCarty Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Edward H. Meyer, Grey Advertising, Inc., Ross R. Millhiser, Philip Morris, Inc., Charles Moss, Wells, Rich, Green, Inc., Raymond J. Mulligan, Liggett Group, Inc., Thomas K. Myers, Norman, Craig & Kummel, Inc., Edward N. Ney, Young & Rebicam International, Inc., John E. O'toole, Foote, Cone & Belding, Chester L. Posey, Degarmo, Inc., Alfred J. Seamon, Ssc&b, Inc., Robert B. Zabel, and Nw Ayer Abh International, Federal Trade Commission v. Donald P. Carter, B. Blair Vedder and Needham, Harper & Steers, Inc.

636 F.2d 781 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 28, 1980

Federal Maritime Board, 295 F.2d 147, 155 (D.C.Cir.1961), in which a demand of the Federal Maritime Board for documents was remanded to the agency because it provided "no indication whatsoever" of the investigation's purpose … FTC v. Browning, 435 F.2d 96 (D.C.Cir.1970). We have recently stated that "(e)xcept in extraordinary circumstances ..., discovery is improper in a summary subpoena enforcement proceeding". United States v.

International Longshore & Warehouse Union v. NLRB

971 F.3d 356 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 21, 2020

KATSAS, Circuit Judge: Under NLRB v. … Exxel/Atmos, Inc. v. NLRB, 147 F.3d 972, 976 (D.C.

Quezada v. Marshall

915 F. Supp. 2d 129 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 15, 2013

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). Such motions allege that a plaintiff has not properly stated a claim; they do not test a plaintiffs ultimate likelihood of success on the merits. Scheuer v. … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . It is not necessary for the plaintiff to plead all elements of his prima facie case in the complaint, Swierkiewicz v.

Joseph J. Schultz v. National Labor Relations Board, Robert E. Gray, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Grand Union Company, Robert E. Gray, Intervenor

284 F.2d 254 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 15, 1960

National Labor Relations Board v. Kennametal, Inc., 3 Cir., 1950, 182 F.2d 817 , 19 A.L.R. 2d 562 ; and see National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v.

United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, Local 152 v. National Labor Relations Board, Spencer Foods, Inc., Intervenor. Spencer Foods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, Local 152, Intervenor

768 F.2d 1463 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 15, 1985

P 11,557 UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 152, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Spencer Foods, Inc., Intervenor. SPENCER FOODS, INC., Petitioner, v. … The Board is entitled, in making such findings, to consider evidence that is either direct or circumstantial, NLRB v. Link-Belt Co., 311 U.S. 584, 602 , 61 S.Ct. 358, 367 , 85 L.Ed. 368 (1941); Ridgely Mfg. Co. v.

Downing v. Ross

1 App. D.C. 251 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 12, 1893

See also cases of Baltimore v. Gill, 31 Md., 375 , and St. Mary's Industrial School v. Brown, 45 Md., 310, 326 . … See the case of Lord Auckland v. Westminster Local Board of Works, L. Rep., 7 Ch., 597.

Greenhill, Frances v. Spellings, Margaret

482 F.3d 569 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 6, 2007

See Kidwell v. Department of the Army, Board for Correction of Military Records, 56 F.3d 279, 284 (D.C. Cir. 1995). … .”); Brown v. United States, 389 F.3d 1296, 1297 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (holding that a breach of settlement claim should have been brought in the Court of Federal Claims pursuant to the Tucker Act).

Rasul v. Myers

563 F.3d 527 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 24, 2009

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. PER CURIAM: The Supreme Court vacated our decision in Rasul v. … (Brown, J., concurring).