Case law

Nanko Shipping, USA v. Alcoa, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 10, 2017

See Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, 491 U.S. 164, 186 (1989) (citing Tex. Dep’t of Cmty. Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 (1981), and McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973)); Brown v. … See Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1023 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (pleading the underlying facts necessary to rely on comparator evidence in an employment case).

Stuart M. Reed v. Railroad Retirement Board

107 F.3d 923 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 27, 1997

REED, Petitioner, v. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent. No. 96-1117. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Jan. 27, 1997. Before: SILBERMAN, SENTELLE, and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges. … These omissions are inconsistent with reasoned decisionmaking and oblige us to remand to the Board for further explanation.

Alfonso J. Torre v. Marion Barry, Jr., Individually and as Mayor of the District of Columbia

661 F.2d 1371 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 1981

Board of Education, 436 F.Supp. 129, 133 (N.D. Ohio 1977). *1374 The situation of federal employees covered by section 717 of Title VII is different. … Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820, 835 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1969 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976).

American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Texas International Airlines, Inc., Intervenors. United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Texas International Airlines, Inc., Intervenors. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Frontier Airlines, Inc., Intervenors

495 F.2d 1010 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 29, 1974

495 F.2d 1010 161 U.S.App.D.C. 430 AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Texas International Airlines, Inc., et al., Intervenors. UNITED AIR LINES, INC., Petitioner, v. … Taylor, Washington, D.C., was on the brief for intervenors Brown County, Wisconsin and The Green Bay Chamber of Commerce in Nos. 72-1743 and 72-1744. 3 George B.

Local 742, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. National Labor Relations Board, J. L. Simmons Company, Intervenor

533 F.2d 683 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 4, 1976

NLRB v. Local 164, IBEW, 388 F.2d 105 , 108 (3d Cir. 1968); see NLRB v. … Enterprise Ass’n, Local 638 v.

United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Florida MacHine & Foundry Company and Fleco Corporation

441 F.2d 1005 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 4, 1970

P 11,328 UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … N.L.R.B. v.

Equinox Holdings, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

883 F.3d 935 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 2018

Micronesia Corp. v. NLRB, 219 F.3d 661, 665-66 (D.C. … See Amalgamated Clothing & Textile Workers v. NLRB, 736 F.2d 1559, 1564 (D.C. Cir. 1984).

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Aero Corporation, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Aero Corporation, International Union United Automobile, Aerospaceand Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

363 F.2d 702 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 15, 1966

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Aero Corporation, Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … Co. v.

American Federation of Government Employees, Local 2052 v. Janet Reno

992 F.2d 331 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 14, 1993

Brown v. General Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 829-33 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1966-67 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976) (claim for judicial review is not ripe until employee has exhausted administrative remedies). … Inc. v.

Newspaper Assoc. of America v. Postal Regulatory Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 15, 2013

See United States v. … .”); Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 344 (1962) (“It is competition, not competitors, which the [Sherman] Act protects.”).

Priority Air Dispatch, Inc. v. National Transportation Safety Board and Alexander P. Butterfield, Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration

514 F.2d 1335 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 19, 1975

See, e. g., Administrator v. Saupp, 45 C.A.B. 989 (1966); Administrator v. Proud, 42 C.A.B. 1014 (1965); Administrator v. Light, 40 C.A.B. 1008 (1964); Administrator v. … See, e. g., Administrator v. Jackson, 1 N.T. S.B. 2027 (1972) (instrument rating); Administrator v. Stroupe, 1 N.T.S.B. 1708 (1972) (pow-erplant rating); Administrator v.

Univ. of S. Cal. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

918 F.3d 126 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 12, 2019

See Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board , 379 F.2d 453 , 466 (D.C. … V.

Hettinga v. United States

677 F.3d 471 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 13, 2012

BROWN, Circuit Judge, with whom Chief Judge SENTELLE joins, concurring: I agree fully with the court’s opinion. Given the long-standing precedents in this area no other result is possible. … FCC v. Beach Commc’ns, Inc., 508 U.S. 307, 313 , 113 S.Ct. 2096 , 124 L.Ed.2d 211 (1993). See also Pac. States Box & Basket Co. v. White, 296 U.S. 176, 185-86 , 56 S.Ct. 159 , 80 L.Ed. 138 (1935); Steffan v.

Teri-Ann Gross v. Nadine P. Winter, Councilmember, Council of the District of Columbia

876 F.2d 165 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 26, 1989

She relies principally on this court’s decision in Browning v. Clerk, U.S. … E.g., Browning v. Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives, 789 F.2d 923 , 926 n. 6 (D.C.Cir.1986) (citing Helstoski v.

University Of Texas M.D. Ander v. Kathleen Sebelius

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 17, 2011

See Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Res. Def. Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984). … In prior proceedings with other hospitals, moreover, the Board had not required an express showing of the net financial impact of the different drugs. See Belmont Hills Hospital v.

Gray Properties, Inc. v. Walter N. Tobriner, Board of Commissioners of the District of Columbia, and George J. Trivers

357 F.2d 829 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 10, 1966

Miller Development Co. v. Emig Properties Corp., 77 U.S.App.D.C. 205, 208 , 134 F.2d 36, 39 , cert. denied, 318 U.S. 788 , 63 S.Ct. 983 , 87 L.Ed. 1155 (1943).

Texas International Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Southwest Airlines Company, Intervenor. Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Southwest Airlines Company, Intervenor

473 F.2d 1150 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 11, 1972

473 F.2d 1150 154 U.S.App.D.C. 113 TEXAS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES, INC., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Southwest Airlines Company, Intervenor. BRANIFF AIRWAYS, INC., Petitioner, v. … Texas Aeronautics Commission v. Braniff Airways, Inc., 454 S.W.2d 199 .

United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, and Local 4203, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

294 F.2d 256 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 10, 1961

This case is before us on a petition to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board and a cross-petition by the Board for enforcement of that order. … Seafarers International Union, Etc. v. N. L. R. B., 105 U.S.App.D.C. 211 , 265 F.2d 585 (1959). 5 . See Communications Workers of America A.F.L.C.I.O. v. N. L. R.

Howard v. Hey

18 App. D.C. 142 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 2, 1901

Hisey v. Peters, 6 App. D. C. 68, 71; Hien v. Buhoup, 11 App. D. C. 293; Glenn v. Adams, 12 App. D. C. 175, 178; Esty v. Newton, 14 App. D. C. 50, 53. … Warner v. Smith, 13 App. D. C. 111, 115; Traver v. Brown, 14 App. D. C. 34, 41; Esty v. Newton, 14 App. D. C. 50, 54; Fefel v. Stocker, 17 App. D. C. 317; Reichenbach v. Kelley, idem, 333; Beals v. Finkenbiner, 12 App.

Thomas B. Roelofs v. Secretary of the Air Force

628 F.2d 594 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 6, 1980

Brown, 449 F.Supp. 207 (N.D.Cal.1978) (Navy regulation mandating discharge upon finding of homosexual conduct). Cf. International Harvester Company v. Ruckelshaus, 155 U.S.App.D.C. 411, 437 , 478 F.2d 615 , 641 (D.C. … As described by the majority, neither the Discharge Board of Officers nor the administrative review board offered any explanation for its actions. . See, e. g., Burlington Truck Lines v.