Case law

National Petrochemical & Refiners Ass'n v. Environmental Protection Agency

643 F.3d 958 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 21, 2010

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY , RESPONDENT GROWTH ENERGY AND NATIONAL BIODIESEL BOARD , INTERVENORS Consolidated with No. 10-1071 On Petitions for … Barnhart v.

Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Tns, Inc., Johnny Bettis, Intervenors. Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

806 F.2d 269 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 2, 1986

Mahon v. NLRB, No. 85-7565 (9th Cir.1985); Roadway Express, Inc. v. … See FED.R.CIV.P. 23(e); Armstrong v.

United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

566 F.3d 1095 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 22, 2009

E.g., FTC v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 778 F.2d 35, 41–42 & n.3 (D.C. Cir. 1985). We find none. … V.

Hugh Kaufman v. Thomas Perez

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 14, 2014

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 455 (D.C. … The limitations for this claim, Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446 (D.C. Cir. 1999), appears to have been superseded on that point by a later Supreme Court decision. See Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. v.

United States v. Charles J. Ash, Jr.

461 F.2d 92 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 1972

The defense later called an Assistant United States Attorney who testified, inter alia, that he had indicated he would testify before the parole board in McFarland’s behalf. 7 II. … We make this clear because the judges concurring in Ash have differed in their votes in United States v. Brown, Proctor and Williams, No. 24,452, 149 U.S.

Grant v. Entm't Cruises, Inc.

282 F. Supp. 3d 114 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 16, 2017

This is no easy task as much of the factual recitation is jumbled, and what actually happened on board the ship is not easily discerned. Plaintiff, who served in the U.S. … See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc. , 789 F.3d 146 , 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015). Rule 12(b)(6)'s pleading standard is "not meant to impose a great burden upon a plaintiff," Dura Pharm., Inc. v.

Daniel C. Walser, Members of the District of Columbia Board of Registration for Professional Engineers v. Andre Merle

228 F.2d 465 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 15, 1955

Andre Merle’s application for registration as a professional engineer was rejected, after a hearing, by the District of Columbia Board of Registration for Professional Engineers on the ground that the applicant was not a … After filing findings of fact and conclusions of law, the District Court remanded the case to the Board for rehearing in accordance therewith. From this order the members of the Board appeal.

Irving Bank Corporation v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Bank of New York Company, Inc., Intervenor

845 F.2d 1035 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 18, 1988

United States v. … United States v.

Plymouth Cnty. Ret. Ass'n ex rel. Situated v. Advisory Bd. Co.

370 F. Supp. 3d 60 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 29, 2019

See Oran v. … See Kalnit v.

Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Local 4-243, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Allied Chemical Corporation, Intervenor

362 F.2d 943 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 24, 1966

Lorain Journal Co. v. FCC, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 127 , 351 F.2d 824 , 828 (1965), cert. denied sub nom. WWIZ, Inc. v. FCC, 383 U.S. 967 , 86 S.Ct. 1272 , 16 L.Ed.2d 308 (April 4, 1966). … Retail Store Employees Union v. NLRB, 123 U.S.App.D.C.-, 360 F.2d 494 (July 13, 1965). In our opinion, the Board properly discharged this function.

James A. Bethel, Jr. v. Burtell M. Jefferson, Chief of Police, Metropolitan Police Department. Ernest E. Hemby v. Burtell M. Jefferson, Chief of Police, Metropolitan Police Department

589 F.2d 631 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 9, 1978

See Bell v. Brown, supra note 54 , 181 U.S.App.D.C. at 230 , 557 F.2d at 853 68 Coles v. Penny, supra note 54 , 174 U.S.App.D.C. at 284 , 531 F.2d at 616 69 Love v. … . § 2000e-16(c) (1976) 78 Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 832 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1967-1968 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402, 411 (1976) 79 Id 80 Adams v.

Teamsters Local Union No. 328, Affiliated With the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, Wittock Supply Company, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Wittock Supply Company

419 F.2d 688 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 1969

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Wittock Supply Company, Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. WITTOCK SUPPLY COMPANY, Respondent. No. 21913. No. 21977. … I would remand No. 21,913 to the Board for a statement of reasons. 10 After Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. N. L. R.

William Christopher Brown v. Janet Reno, U.S. Attorney General

8 F.3d 71 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 15, 1993

William Christopher BROWN, Appellant, v. Janet RENO, U.S. Attorney General. No. 92-5460. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Oct. 15, 1993.

Jesse Redmond v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr.

859 F.3d 11 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 2017

Before: ROGERS, BROWN and MILLETT, Circuit Judges.  2 Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge MILLETT. … See Erickson v.

Retail Clerks Union, No. 1550, Retail Clerks International Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, and the Kroger Company, Intervenor

330 F.2d 210 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 23, 1964

See, for example, Anderson Lithographic Co., 124 N.L.R.B. 920 (1959), enforced sub nom, N.L.R.B. v. … See Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).

James Sherley v. Kathleen Sebelius

689 F.3d 776 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 24, 2012

See, e.g., Cohen v. Brown Univ., 101 F.3d 155, 169 (1st Cir. 1996). Thus arose the exception to the law- of-the-case doctrine. … Id. at 20 (quoting Cohen v. Brown Univ., 101 F.3d 155, 169 (1st Cir. 1996) (other citations, quotation marks, and alterations omitted)). In This That and The Other Gift and Tobacco, Inc. v.

Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Continental Air Lines, Inc., Braniff Airways, Inc., American Airlines, Inc., Intervenors

247 F.2d 562 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 9, 1957

Eastern Air Lines v. C. A. B., supra, 243 F.2d at page 609. … Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. F. C. C., 1945, 326 U.S. 327 , 66 S.Ct. 148 , 90 L.Ed. 108 . 2 . Eastern Air Lines v. C. A. B., 100 U.S.App.D.C. 184 , 243 F.2d 607 . 3 . Eastern Air Lines v. !. A. B., supra, note 2.

In re: FBOP Execution Protocol Cases

980 F.3d 123 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 18, 2020

Oregon, 546 U.S. 243 (2006), and FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 (2000). … Brown & Williamson, 529 U.S. at 134 (cleaned up); see also United States v.

Judith Pietersen v. DOS

138 F.4th 552 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 30, 2025

However, the court did not reach Pietersen’s standing since she sought the same relief as Brown and Brown had standing. Id. … See Summers v.

International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio and Council of North Atlantic Shipping Associations v. National Labor Relations Board, International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio and Council of North Atlanticshipping Associations v. National Labor Relations Board, Houff Transfer, Inc., Intervenor. International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio and New York Shippingassociation, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

613 F.2d 890 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 21, 1980

P 11,584 INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO and Council of North Atlantic Shipping Associations, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. … In NLRB v.