Case law

Bricklayers, Masons and Plasterers International Union of America v. National Labor Relations Board. National Labor Relations Board v. Bricklayers, Stone Masons, Marble Masons, Tile Setters and Terrazzo Workers, Local Union No. 1 of Tennessee

475 F.2d 1316 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 1, 1973

P 13,453 BRICKLAYERS, MASONS AND PLASTERERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … This interpretation of section 10(k) by the Board is entitled to great weight. United States v.

Local Union No. 103, International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

535 F.2d 87 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 25, 1976

It is clear enough that the Board was— and is — unhappy with this court’s opinion in Local No. 150 v. … Union No. 57 v.

Children's Hospital of District of Columbia v. Adkins

284 F. 613 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 1922

See Wilson v. New, 243 U. S. 332, 345, 346 ; Ft. Smith & Western R. R. Co. v. Mills, 253 U. S. 206 . … As the court said, in Truax v.

International Union, Security, Police & Fire Professionals of America v. Faye

828 F.3d 969 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 15, 2016

In Arbaugh v. … See District of Columbia Nurses Ass’n v. Brown, No. 15-203, 153 F.Supp.3d 1, 1-2 , 2016 WL 29252, at *1-2 (D.D.C. Jan. 4, 2016) (reaching the same result).

Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union, Afl-Cio, Clc v. National Labor Relations Board, M. Lowenstein Corporation, Intervenor. M. Lowenstein Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union, Afl-Cio, Clc, Intervenor

736 F.2d 1559 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 1984

P 11,092 AMALGAMATED CLOTHING AND TEXTILE WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, M. Lowenstein Corporation, Intervenor. M. LOWENSTEIN CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. … See Boire v.

Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl--Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Jimmy-Richard Co., Inc.,intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Jimmy--Richard Company, Inc., Amalgamated Clothing Workers Ofamerica, Intervenor

527 F.2d 803 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 13, 1976

P 11,169 AMALGAMATED CLOTHING WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL--CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Jimmy-Richard Co., Inc.,Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … NLRB v.

Verso Corp. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n

898 F.3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 31, 2018

Power Comm’n v. Sierra Pac. … Comm’n v.

Robert P. Smith v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary of Defense

513 F.2d 462 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 15, 1975

See also Williams v. Robinson, 139 U.S.App.D.C. 204 , 432 F.2d 637, 642 (1970). This rule is not iron-clad. See Williams v. Robinson, supra, at 642 n. 17; Brown v. … Schneider v. Smith, 390 U.S. 17 , 88 S.Ct. 682 , 19 L.Ed.2d 799 (1968); Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957); Harmon v.

Maryland Department of Human Resources v. Department of Health and Human Services

763 F.2d 1441 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1985

V).” Bell v. … See Block v. Community Nutrition Institute, - U.S. -, -, 104 S.Ct. 2450, 2454 , 81 L.Ed.2d 270 (1984); Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 317-18 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1725-26 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979).

United States v. Robert Miller

799 F.3d 1097 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 21, 2015

Brown testified about a brochure, entitled “Company Profile,” which Miller had given Brown to persuade her to join AFIC. … See United States v. Brown, 152 F. App’x 55 (2d Cir. 2005).

Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Frontier Airlines, Inc., Delta Air Lines, Inc., Intervenors. Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Delta Air Lines, Inc., National Airlines, Inc., Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Intervenors

443 F.2d 745 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 12, 1971

443 F.2d 745 CONTINENTAL AIR LINES, INC., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Frontier Airlines, Inc., Delta Air Lines, Inc., Intervenors. CONTINENTAL AIR LINES, INC., Petitioner, v. … The Board refused, and Delta, among others, petitioned this court to review the decision. In National Air Lines, Inc. v.

United States v. Larry Wilkerson

966 F.3d 828 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 24, 2020

Brown, 823 F.2d at 596. … Several other circuits have since adopted our approach in Brown. See, e.g., United States v. Kemp, 500 F.3d 257, 304 (3d Cir. 2007); United States v. Abbell, 271 F.3d 1286, 1302 (11th Cir. 2001); United States v.

United States v. Bridgeman

523 F.2d 1099 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 28, 1975

Langel v. United States, 451 F.2d 957 (8th Cir. 1971); Roberts v. United States, 416 F.2d 1216 (5th Cir. 1969); United States v. Levinson, supra; Cave v. United States, supra; Nassif v. … Sentencing Transcript, William Brown, 23-24.

Michael L. Durrah v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor

760 F.2d 322 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 30, 1985

O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, 340 U.S. 504, 507 , 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951). Accord, e.g., O’Keeffe v. … See, e.g., O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, 340 U.S. 504 , 71 S.Ct. 470 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951); Green v. DeFuria, 19 N.J. 290 , 116 A.2d 19 (1955); Feldman v. A.B.C.

American Federation of Government Employees v. O'connor

747 F.2d 748 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 1984

The appellants seek to challenge an advisory opinion issued by the Special Counsel, an official charged solely with authority to prosecute cases before the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”).

Blanche H. Lober v. Willis Moore

417 F.2d 714 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 18, 1969

United States, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 173, 174-175 , 344 F.2d 558, 559-560 (1965); Brown v. Brown, 74 App.D.C. 309, 310-311 , 122 F.2d 219, 220-221 (1941); District of Columbia v. … E.g., Gordon v. Board of Supervisors, 207 Va. 827 , 153 S.E.2d 270 , 274 (1967); Storm v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 199 Va. 130 , 97 S.E.2d 759, 761-762 , 69 A.L.R.2d 849 (1957); Pittston Co. v.

Local 483, International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

288 F.2d 166 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 2, 1961

This term, in Board parlance, signifies the removal as a result of an election of a craft group from a broader bargaining unit of which it was previously a part. … See Jones, Self-Determination v. Stability of Labor Relations, 58 Mich.L.Rev. 313 (1960); Cox, The Legal Nature of Collective Bargaining Agreements, 57 Mich.L.Rev. 1, 12, (1958).

J. F. Hoff Electric Company v. National Labor Relations Board, Local Union 323, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Intervenor

642 F.2d 1266 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 20, 1981

The Legal Ownership Argument: In NLRB v. … See also Seafarer’s Int’l Union v.

Kramer, Mark Lee v. Rumsfeld, Donald

481 F.3d 788 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 2007

See Kramer v. Cohen, Civ. Action No. 96-497, Memorandum Order at 4 (D.D.C. Apr. 8, 1997); Kidwell v. Department of Army, Board for Correction of Military Records, 56 F.3d 279, 284 (D.C. … Someone who has received appointment might “never achieve the status of employee,” Ainslie, 355 F.3d at 1374 (quoting McCarley v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 757 F.2d 278, 280 (Fed. Cir. 1985)).

Cooper v. O'CONNOR

99 F.2d 135 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 27, 1938

Brewer, 57 App.D.C. 126, 130 , 18 F.2d 168, 172 , 53 A.L.R. 1519 , certiorari denied, 275 U.S. 530 , 48 S.Ct. 28 , 72 L.Ed. 409 ; Brown v. … Ed. 696 . 21 Lang v. Wood, 67 App.D.C. 287 , 92 F.2d 211 . 22 Brown v. Rudolph, 58 App.D.C. 116 , 25 F.2d 540 , cert. denied, 277 U.S. 605 , 48 S.Ct. 601 , 72 L.Ed. 1011 . 23 Smith v.