Case law

United States v. Rown Brown

871 F.2d 1149 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 15, 1989

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Rown BROWN, Appellant. No. 88-3049. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. March 15, 1989. Before WALD, Chief Judge, and STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS and D.H. … Kercheval v.

S. Simcha Goldman v. Secretary of Defense

734 F.2d 1531 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 10, 1984

Brown v. Glines, 444 U.S. at 353-58 , 100 S.Ct. at 598-01 (upholding different Air Force regulations). … Unlike the states in Wisconsin v. Yoder, Thomas v. Review Board, and Sherbert v.

Local Union No. 636, United Association of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry v. National Labor Relations Board

430 F.2d 906 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 29, 1970

Moreover, the Board’s application of the “right to control” test completely ignores the teaching of the Supreme Court in National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass’n v. … See Beacon Castle Square Building Corp. v. NLRB, 1 Cir., 406 F.2d 188 , 192 n. 10 (1969) . See also Danielson v. Painters District Council No. 20, etc., S.D.N.Y., 305 F.Supp. 1108, 1113-1117 (1969) ; Rotenberg v.

United States v. Saro, Carlos

252 F.3d 449 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 2001

In United States v. … In Slack v.

Empire State Highway Transportation Association, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Board and United States of America, American Export Lines, Intervenors

291 F.2d 336 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 27, 1961

Ass’n. v. American Export Lines, 5 F.M.B. 565, 585, 586 (1959).” 3 Petitioner here seeks review of this order of the Board, the question being whether Tariff No. 5 requires Board approval under section 15. … Ass’n v. American Export Lines, Inc., No. 894, FMB, May 18, 1960. 4 . We use the word “Board” as including also the Board’s predecessors. 5 .

Lewis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

314 F. Supp. 3d 135 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 11, 2018

Mem. at 12 (quoting Brown v. Cont'l Airlines, Inc. , 647 F.3d 221 , 226 (5th Cir. 2011) ), and that the Court should not apply the two-step process the Supreme Court adopted in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. … ."); Davis v. PBGC , 864 F.Supp.2d at 155 ("[T]he Court will apply Chevron deference to those claims in which [the p]laintiffs challenge [the] PBGC's interpretations of ambiguous ERISA provisions."); Brown v.

Patricia Ann Felch v. Air Florida, Inc. American Motorists Insurance Company v. United States

866 F.2d 1521 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 7, 1989

See District of Columbia v. Air Florida, Inc., 750 F.2d 1077, 1078-79 (D.C.Cir.1984); Brown v. Collins, 402 F.2d 209, 213 (D.C.Cir.1968). … See District of Columbia v. Air Florida, Inc., 750 F.2d at 1078-79 ; Brown v. Collins, 402 F.2d at 213 . III. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the District Court. Affirmed. 1 .

Garland Lewis v. District of Columbia

793 F.2d 361 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 1986

Because he thought Brown was trying to rob him, Lewis fled, turned a corner, and fell. Brown pursued him, knelt down next to him on the ground, and, after some hostile words, shot him through the jaw. … See Miller v. Poretsky, 595 F.2d 780 (D.C.Cir.1978). Lewis has made no such showing.

Women's Equity Action League v. Lauro F. Cavazos, Secretary of Education

906 F.2d 742 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 1990

Plaintiffs rely as well on Brown v. Califano, 627 F.2d 1221 , 1233 n. 73 (D.C.Cir.1980), which suggested in dictum that “a private individual could challenge in court HEW’s continued funding of a noncomplying district.” … Utley v.

Merck & Co. v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.

385 F. Supp. 3d 81 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 8, 2019

Brown & Williamson , 529 U.S. at 133 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 . … Brown & Williamson , 529 U.S. at 159 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 .

International Association of Tool Craftsmen v. Boyd Leedom, Individually and as Chairman and Members of the National Labor Relations Board

276 F.2d 514 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 29, 1960

Leedom v. … But the question of an appropriate bargaining unit falls within “the wide area of determinations which depend on the Board’s expertise and discretion,” Leedom v.

Carpet, Linoleum, Soft Tile & Resilient Floor Covering Layers, Local Union No. 419 v. National Labor Relations Board

429 F.2d 747 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 1970

National Woodwork Manufacturers v. … Workers, Local 501 v.

Grassroots Recycling Network, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

429 F.3d 1109 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 18, 2005

Sierra Club v. EPA, 292 F.3d 895, 898 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citing Hunt v. Wash. State Apple Adver. Comm’n, 432 U.S. 333, 342- 43 (1977)). … Action Network v. Browner, 87 F.3d 1379, 1383 (D.C.

The Delaware and Hudson Railway Company v. United Transportation Union

450 F.2d 603 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1971

Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 284-285 [ 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 ] (1905). See, also, Labor Board v. … Radio Officers v. Labor Board, 347 U.S. 17, 45 [ 74 S.Ct. 323 , 98 L.Ed. 455 ] (1954). See, e. g., Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp., 373 US. 221, 227-22S [ 83 S.Ct. 1139 , 10 L.Ed.2d 308 ] (1903) ; Teamsters Local v.

Richard Coffee v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

899 F.2d 52 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 6, 1990

Coffee could perform, we find that the Board has failed to carry its burden of proof in this case. See Simms v. … V 1987); see also Carter v. Railroad Retirement Bd., 834 F.2d 62, 66 (3d Cir.1987); Baugus v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 717 F.2d 443, 448 (8th Cir.1983); Kelly v.

Douglas v. Donovan

559 F.3d 549 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 17, 2009

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge TATEL. … Forkkio v. Powell, 306 F.3d 1127, 1131 (D.C.Cir.2002); see also Holcomb v.

International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

839 F.2d 809 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 19, 1988

In Burlington Northern R.R. v. … Burlington Northern R.R. v.

WIBC, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

259 F.2d 941 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 16, 1958

Brown v. District of Columbia, 1888, 127 U.S. 579, 586 , 8 S.Ct. 1314 , 32 L.Ed. 262 ; United States v. Ballin, Joseph & Co., 1891, 144 U.S. 1 , 12 S.Ct. 507 , 36 L.Ed. 321 ; Frischer & Co. v. … State Tax Comm., 1946, 109 Utah 563 , 168 P.2d 324 ; Adkins v. Citizens Board, 1932, 112 W.Va. 171 , 163 S.E. 853, 854 .

Teamsters Local Union No. 515, Affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board

906 F.2d 719 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 1990

The Board’s interpretation of the Act on this point is a permissible one, to which we must defer. See, e.g., NLRB v. … Brief for Board at 43. The Board then cites as supporting authority Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v.

Dolphin & Bradbury, Inc. v. Securities & Exchange Commission

512 F.3d 634 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 11, 2008

Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and BROWN and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges. … Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN.  2 BROWN, Circuit Judge: Dolphin & Bradbury, Inc. and Robert J.