Case law

Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, Local Union No. 7, International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union, Intervenor

892 F.2d 130 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 29, 1989

We held in ILWU v. … final settlement of jurisdictional disputes once the Board’s authority has been properly invoked, see NLRB v.

International Association of Tool Craftsmen v. Boyd Leedom, Individually and as Chairman and Members of the National Labor Relations Board

276 F.2d 514 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 29, 1960

Leedom v. … But the question of an appropriate bargaining unit falls within “the wide area of determinations which depend on the Board’s expertise and discretion,” Leedom v.

Carpet, Linoleum, Soft Tile & Resilient Floor Covering Layers, Local Union No. 419 v. National Labor Relations Board

429 F.2d 747 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 1970

National Woodwork Manufacturers v. … Workers, Local 501 v.

Southern California Edison Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

502 F.3d 176 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 2, 2007

Before: HENDERSON, RANDOLPH and BROWN, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON. … In support, FERC relies on our decision in Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen v. Surface Transportation Board, 457 F.3d 24 (D.C. Cir. 2006). FERC’s reliance is misplaced.

Retail Clerks International Association, Afl-Cio, and Retail Clerks International Association, Local 880, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

366 F.2d 642 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 27, 1966

But it argues that the only case in which this Board policy has been reviewed by a court, International Ladies Garment Workers’ Union v. … The Board cites two cases for this proposition, International Ladies Garment Workers’ Union v.

William L. Greene v. Neil H. McElroy Secretary of Defense

254 F.2d 944 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 1958

Parker v. Lester, 9 Cir., 1955, 227 F.2d 708 ; Brown & Fassett, Security Tests for Maritime Workers: Due Process under the Port Security Program, 62 Yale L.J. 1163 (1953). … Schware v.

Board of Trustees of the Hotel and Restaurant Employees Local 25 and Employers' Health and Welfare Fund v. Jpr, Inc.

136 F.3d 794 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 27, 1998

(We will refer to the two plans as “the Funds,” and .to their Boards of Trustees collectively as “the Trustees.”) … Goos v.

North Central Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Lake Central Airlines Employee Stockholder Group and Lake Central Airlines, Inc., Intervenors

265 F.2d 581 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 8, 1959

The contract had to be approved by the Civil Aeronautics Board. The Board refused to approve it, and so the case is here. The key concept in this controversy is “local service” or “feeder service”. … In the present case the Board pointed out, as one feature of the proposed merged system, the lack of inter-area local traffic. But in Arizona-Monarch the Board stressed other circumstances.

Karl F. Ritz v. Civil Aeronautics Board and William F. McKee Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency

373 F.2d 666 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 3, 1967

Petitioner does not question the Board’s power to suspend his license for disciplinary purposes upon proper findings after a full hearing. See Pangburn v. CAB, 311 F.2d 349 (1st Cir. 1962). 3 . … SEC v. Chenery Corp., 332 U.S. 194, 196 , 67 S.Ct. 1575 , 91 L.Ed. 1995 (1947). See Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States, 371 U.S. 156, 167-168 , 83 S.Ct. 239 , 9 L.Ed.2d 207 (1962); Bell v.

Federal Trade Commission v. Weyerhaeuser Company

665 F.2d 1072 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 1, 1981

United States v. Brown Shoe Co., 1956 Trade Cas. ¶ 68,244 (E.D.Mo.1956). See also FTC v. PepsiCo, Inc., 477 F.2d 24 (2d Cir. 1973); United States v. G. … Brown Shoe Co., 1956 Trade Cas. ¶ 68 , 244, at 71,116 (E.D.Mo.1956). . See, e. g., decisions cited in note 24 supra. . But cf. FTC v.

CC1 Ltd. P'ship v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

898 F.3d 26 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 3, 2018

We cannot second-guess "the ALJ's credibility determinations, as adopted by the Board, unless they are patently insupportable." Gold Coast Rest. Corp. v. NLRB , 995 F.2d 257 , 265 (D.C. Cir. 1993) (quoting NLRB v. … Corp. v. NLRB , 863 F.2d 964 , 967 (D.C. Cir. 1988) (stating that the Board "can infer from falsity of employer's stated reason for discharge that motive is unlawful" (citing Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v.

Neal, James H. v. DC

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 16, 1997

Wald, Circuit Judge: This is a companion case to Brown v. Plaut, No. 96-7027 (D.C. Cir. Dec. 16, 1997). … See Brown, slip op. at 12.

Lewis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

314 F. Supp. 3d 135 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 11, 2018

Mem. at 12 (quoting Brown v. Cont'l Airlines, Inc. , 647 F.3d 221 , 226 (5th Cir. 2011) ), and that the Court should not apply the two-step process the Supreme Court adopted in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. … ."); Davis v. PBGC , 864 F.Supp.2d at 155 ("[T]he Court will apply Chevron deference to those claims in which [the p]laintiffs challenge [the] PBGC's interpretations of ambiguous ERISA provisions."); Brown v.

Women's Equity Action League v. Lauro F. Cavazos, Secretary of Education

906 F.2d 742 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 1990

Plaintiffs rely as well on Brown v. Califano, 627 F.2d 1221 , 1233 n. 73 (D.C.Cir.1980), which suggested in dictum that “a private individual could challenge in court HEW’s continued funding of a noncomplying district.” … Utley v.

Pro-Col Corporation v. Commissioner of Patents

436 F.2d 296 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 25, 1970

E.g., Hays v. Brenner, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 96 , 98, 357 F.2d 287, 289 (1966). This presumption of validity is reinforced where, as here, the District Court has sustained the Patent Office’s action. Zenith Radio Corp. v. … Hays v. Brenner, supra, 123 U.S.App.D.C. at 98, 357 F.2d at 289 ; Zenith Radio Corp. v. Ladd, supra, 114 U.S.App.D.C. at 57 , 310 F.2d at 862 .

George A. Parker, Successor Testamentary Trustee to Archibald S. Pinkett, of the Estate of W. H. C. Brown v. Mildred Banks

331 F.2d 806 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 2, 1964

George Parker, successor testamentary trustee under the will of one Brown, was removed from office by the District Court at the instance of the United States which had been allowed to intervene as parens patriae and successor

Cna Financial Corporation v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor

830 F.2d 1132 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 29, 1987

Chrysler Corp. v. Schlesinger, 565 F.2d 1172, 1186 (3d Cir.1977), vacated and remanded sub nom. Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, supra note 1. 53 . Goland v. … See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, supra note 1, 441 U.S. at 317 , 99 S.Ct. at 1725 , 60 L.Ed.2d at 234 . 148 . See Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v.

Associated Press v. National Labor Relations Board, Wire Service Guild, Local 222, the News-Paper Guild, Afl-Cio-Clc, Intervenor. Noel M. Yancey v. National Labor Relations Board, the Associated Press, Intervenor

492 F.2d 662 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 20, 1974

P 14,325 ASSOCIATED PRESS, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Wire Service Guild, Local 222, The News-paper Guild, AFL-CIO-CLC, Intervenor. Noel M. YANCEY, Petitioner v. … Auburn Rubber Co., 10 Cir., 384 F.2d 1 (1967); Ramsey v. NLRB, supra note 1, 327 F.2d 784 . See also language favorable to the Spielberg policy in NLRB v.

Air Transport Ass'n of America v. Department of Transportation

900 F.2d 369 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 13, 1990

Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 316 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1725 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). … Brown, 441 U.S. at 316 , 99 S.Ct. at 1725 .

Truck Drivers, Oil Drivers, Filling Station and Platform Workers Local No. 705 v. National Labor Relations Board

509 F.2d 425 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 19, 1974

Newberry Co. v. NLRB, 442 F.2d 987, 901 (2d Cir. 1971). But even a single remark may have the implication, in context, of a threat that the Board may condemn. NLRB v. … In NLRB v.