Case law

Workman v. United Methodist Committee on Relief of the General Board of Global Ministries of the United Methodist Church

320 F.3d 259 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 25, 2003

See, e.g., Potts v. … In Doe v.

Grain Elevator, Flour and Feed Mill Workers, International Longshoremen Association, Local 418, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

376 F.2d 774 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 31, 1967

Madden v. Grain Elevator, etc., Local 418, supra note 2 at 1019. That opinion sufficiently demonstrates the inapplicability to the controversy before the Board of the Supreme Court’s decision in Incres S.S. Co. v. … Madden v. Grain Elevator, etc., Local 418, supra note 2, 334 F.2d at 1020 . This was not the basis of the Board’s decision, and hence is not before us. 8 .

Building and Construction Trades Department, Afl-Cio v. United States Department of Labor Wage Appeals Board, Midway Excavators, Inc.

932 F.2d 985 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 18, 1991

Zachry Co. v. United States, 170 Ct.Cl. 115 , 344 F.2d 352 (1965). … See Petition for Review by the Wage Appeals Board at 6 (Nov. 20, 1981).

Local 666, International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees & Moving Pictures Machine Operators v. National Labor Relations Board

904 F.2d 47 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 29, 1990

Thus, the Board's unit finding does not per se preclude the employer from adding to, or subtracting from, the employees’ work assignments.’ ” 692 F.2d at 623 (quoting Carey v. Westinghouse Elec. … As Justice Stewart presciently observed in Fibreboard Corp. v.

Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc., Proposed Intervenor v. United States of America, American Bar Association

118 F.3d 776 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 15, 1997

See United States v. Alex. Brown & Sons, 169 F.R.D. 532, 539-40 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (granting intervention of right in Tunney Act proceeding to move to compel disclosure of settlement documents). … United States v. Alex. Brown & Sons, Inc., 169 F.R.D. 532, 541 (S.D.N.Y.1996).

United States v. Eddie Brown

948 F.2d 782 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 7, 1992

UNITED STATES of America v. Eddie BROWN, Appellant. No. 90-3234. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Nov. 27, 1991. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Feb. 7, 1992. Before HARRY T. … As this Court explained in United States v.

Association of Flight Attendants-CWA v. United States Department of Transportation

564 F.3d 462 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 1, 2009

Cir. 2005) (quoting United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 553 (1996)) (internal quotation omitted). … Allen v.

Retail Clerks International Association Local No. 455, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Retail Clerks Union, Local No. 560 Retail Clerks International Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

510 F.2d 802 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 4, 1975

P 10,632 RETAIL CLERKS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION LOCAL NO. 455, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. … While the Board may defer to arbitration on the issue of accretion to an existing unit, both the Board and the courts have required that any award be consistent with Board bargaining unit policy. See Boire v.

United States v. Perry Lynch

499 F.2d 1011 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 1974

Because United States v. … Indeed, in Barker v.

National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1622 v. Harold M. Brown, Individually and as Secretary of Defense, and the Department of Defense, American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio v. Harold M. Brown, Secretary of Defense

645 F.2d 1017 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 1, 1981

(BN 142, 207 U.S.App.D.C. 92 NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1622, Appellant, v. Harold M. BROWN, Individually and As Secretary of Defense, and The Department of Defense, Appellees. … Brown, 481 F.Supp. 704 (D.D.C.1979); American Fed'n of Gov't Employees v. Brown, 481 F.Supp. 711 (D.D.C.1979) 5 5 U.S.C. §§ 5341-5349 (1976 & Supp. III 1979).

Marc Feldman v. William C. Gardner Edward J. Hickey, Jr. v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals

661 F.2d 1295 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 28, 1981

Although this doctrine originated much earlier, 68 its principal exposition came in Parker v. Brown, 69 decided in 1943. … These cases thus differ from Brown v.

Family Service Agency San Francisco v. National Labor Relations Board, Service Employees International Union, Local 790, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

163 F.3d 1369 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 15, 1999

The hearing officer, and the Board in turn, adopted this conclusion. Desert Palace, Inc. v. … The Board’s rejection of these objections was not raised here. 2 .Certification by the Board is not an "order” subject to judicial review, see American Fed’n of Labor v.

Udc Chairs Chapter, American Association of University Professors v. The Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia

56 F.3d 1469 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 1995

(citing Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. at 335 , 96 S.Ct. at 903 ); see also Board of Governors v. … See, e.g., Brown v.

Francis X. McLaughlin v. Miles F. Alban, Jr.

775 F.2d 389 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 15, 1985

See Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75 , 104 S.Ct. 892 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984); Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 95-96 , 101 S.Ct. 411, 415 , 66 L.Ed.2d 308 (1980). … See Bank of Canton v. Republic National Bank, 636 F.2d 30, 31 (2d Cir.1980); Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. DASA Corp., 605 F.2d 35, 40-41 (2d Cir.1979).

International Woodworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Local 3-10 v. National Labor Relations Board, Long Lake Lumber Company, Intervenor

380 F.2d 628 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 17, 1967

Board counsel, citing Chauffeurs, Teamsters, etc., Local No. 200 v. … NLRB, 357 F.2d 664, 666 (1st Cir. 1966); NLRB v. Clegg, 304 F.2d 168, 176 (8th Cir. 1962); NLRB v. Grunwald-Marx, Inc., 290 F.2d 210 (9th Cir. 1961); NLRB v. Mississippi Prods., Inc., 213 F.2d 670, 674 (5th Cir. 1954).

Fleischman v. United States

174 F.2d 519 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 8, 1949

, boards of directors, or boards of trustees. … See Blair v. United States, 1919, 250 U.S. 273 , 39 S.Ct. 468 , 63 L.Ed. 979 , and Brown v.

International Association of Heat & Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Alexander Stafford Corporation, and the Master Insulators Association

254 F.2d 955 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 24, 1958

254 F.2d 955 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HEAT & FROST INSULATORS AND ASBESTOS WORKERS, AFL-CIO, et al., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … Board, 118 N.L.R.B.

International Woodworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Local 3-10 v. National Labor Relations Board, Long Lake Lumber Company, Intervenor

458 F.2d 852 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 18, 1972

Fruit & Vegetable Packers and Warehousemen, Local 760 v. NLRB, 114 U.S.App.D.C. 388, 389-390 , 316 F.2d 389 , 390-391 (1963); and see Retail Clerks Union No. 1550 v. … Union, Local 4-243 v. NLRB, 124 U.S.App.D.C. 113, 116 , 362 F.2d 943, 946 (1966).

Wendy Wagner v. Federal Election Commission

793 F.3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 7, 2015

Brown, at least, has already done so. See Brown Supp. Mootness Decl. ¶ 3. Accordingly, Wagner’s and Brown’s claims are moot. See, e.g., Arizonans for Official English v. … (quoting Brown v. Entm’t Merchants Ass’n, 131 S. Ct. 2729, 2740 (2011)).

American Federation of Government Employees v. Gates

486 F.3d 1316 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 18, 2007

Ass’n of Am., Inc. v. Shalala, 23 F.3d 412, 415 (D.C.Cir.1994). If the relevant statu *202 tory language is plain but is inconsistent with the DoD regulations, we must hold the regulations invalid. See Brown v. … also Humphrey’s Ex’r v.